It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: angeldoll
a reply to: Blue_Jay33
It wasn't a blunder. The polls were taken from popular vote, and she actually DID win the popular vote. So, the projections were accurate at that moment.
With 20/20 hindsight and retrospect can we ever trust polls again?
but maybe more an outright lie than a blunder
originally posted by: angeldoll
a reply to: Xcathdra
There is no such thing as a national popular vote.
Right.
originally posted by: Blue_Jay33
a reply to: angeldoll
You know how find a proper average of things, you always removes the highest and lowest variables, for Hillary that would be California, remove that aspect of the popular vote and she lost that too.
originally posted by: angeldoll
originally posted by: Blue_Jay33
a reply to: angeldoll
You know how find a proper average of things, you always removes the highest and lowest variables, for Hillary that would be California, remove that aspect of the popular vote and she lost that too.
There are many ways to determine an average that I am aware of. You can manipulate figures.
You are demeaning the pollsters who for the most part studied many years, and have many degrees to be able to do their jobs with as much accuracy as possible.
She won the popular vote.
originally posted by: Xcathdra
originally posted by: angeldoll
a reply to: Xcathdra
There is no such thing as a national popular vote.
Right.
Yes, I am right.
We use an electoral college system.
You should look it up.
ETA - the problem is you dont think differently. You believe something that is not true. Like a national popular vote.
Educate yourself and get back to us in the thread.