It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
It is clear, nevertheless, that Gos. Thom. was subject to redaction as it was transmitted. The presence of inner-Coptic errors in the sole surviving translation, moreover, suggests that our present Gos. Thom. is not the first Coptic transcription made from the Greek. The ms tradition indicates that this gospel was appropriated again and again in the generations following its composition. Like many other gospels in the first three centuries, the text of Gos. Thom. must be regarded as unstable.
the church isnt that powerful / influential anyway...
The Bible as we know it was completed waaayyyy back in the first century.
for they are not in the bible.
Originally posted by Jonna
Originally posted by James the Lesser
Well Jonna, I am serious, they explain so many questions.
So am I. The bible was changed over time to fit an agenda. It is just too bad that not everyone realizes it.
Oh? and what exactly is that veiled excuse? What false teachings would they be? Do you object to my presenting to you the false teachings of the Christian church? If so take it up with them, for I proffer no fables designed by me, I show you that which is written. The truth hurts, I understand.
Originally posted by PlumboSomewhereinBetween, Stop going to the false teachings of men to justify your unbelief in the truth. This is only a veiled excuse.
You may think you see, but in fact your are blind. I have said nothing you can dispute as having been written. If those written words offend your sensibilities, then you had better take them up with the men who wrote them.
Beneath the grievance, I see hatred of men. Hatred of God. Jesus loves women. Women love Jesus.
Dear sir/madame, I suggest you recalibrate your compass, for I excuse nothing when it comes to bad behaviour within the Biblical text or the churches. If you feel that I have, then please dispense with the diatribe and attest to same.
Stop excusing disobedient behavior by exposing the evil oppression of man. We are all accountable for our own sins. This does not give you the right to justify yours'.
Why yes I was, it is, and no offense to you, one cannot tell another whom they feel has superior intellect that they waste same. You have first of all defined that you are not capable of theirs and therefore have not the ability to judge their thoughts. But I will be humble and tell you that were you to dispense with the platitudes, do away with whatever your reason for trolling me, speak freely and actually debate, you may be a worthy opponent.
You were created beautifully and wonderfully. Life is a gift. Start soaking in the blessings of it. You have so much potential, (I wish I had your intelligence) yet you waste it on crying for so-called equality and justice.
They are banned today for all roman Catholics. But they are not banned for all others simply because they have been uncovered, and the world is no longer governed by Rome.
Originally posted by llpoolejThe books TODAY are not banned.
That is unfortunate, for that is where the history of Christianity lies, and unless you come to know how it was forged, you accept a preconceived notion of same.
I do not rely on church leaders for all my information(at this time in my life none, but that is not because I am smarter, but lazier)
How many times do you require me to read The Bible? Dare you cite a verse I cannot counter? The meanings are not clear, they are contradictory, and their heritage is very questionable.
If you read the bible, and take in the whole book, not just passages, the meanings are clear.
It may be illegal in your world. In mine, it becomes necessary to understand why they were declared illegal, and frankly, in my opinion, Satan won. You speak of class, which suggests to me that you are young and attending a school with a defined doctrine. Do you honestly believe that you will be presented an unbiased point of view?
Reading the apocrypha is not illegal or frowned upon. The next class my church gives on it, I will probably join. This thread has piqued my interest that much
Originally posted by James the Lesser
Also, alot of women don't like that the bible makes them little more then slaves to man, baby factories and nothing else. With the gospels that were removed, who knows, if not removed maybe more women would fell compelled to become christians, or participate in church instead of feeling like a sub-human for not being male.
[edit on 9-2-2005 by James the Lesser]
Oh? and what exactly is that veiled excuse? What false teachings would they be? Do you object to my presenting to you the false teachings of the Christian church? If so take it up with them, for I proffer no fables designed by me, I show you that which is written. The truth hurts, I understand.
You may think you see, but in fact your are blind. I have said nothing you can dispute as having been written. If those written words offend your sensibilities, then you had better take them up with the men who wrote them.
Dear sir/madame, I suggest you recalibrate your compass, for I excuse nothing when it comes to bad behaviour within the Biblical text or the churches. If you feel that I have, then please dispense with the diatribe and attest to same.
Why yes I was, it is, and no offense to you, one cannot tell another whom they feel has superior intellect that they waste same. You have first of all defined that you are not capable of theirs and therefore have not the ability to judge their thoughts.
But I will be humble and tell you that were you to dispense with the platitudes, do away with whatever your reason for trolling me, speak freely and actually debate, you may be a worthy opponent.
The question is, why do you follow me, and what is it you hope to achieve?