It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Jacobu12
Anyway night keep rocking and rolling.
originally posted by: neutronflux
originally posted by: bloodymarvelous
Would he have feared being unable to breach the wall at a lower speed? In a 747?
Why would be practice a high speed crash instead of an easier crash?
A 757? Seeing if people are paying attention? Or an implication.
The throttles were not worked to full until it seems the pilot of flight 77 thought the jet was lined up and starting the descent. I would say its simply human nature to use full ramming speed to be blunt. Do you go half assed when tackling the opposing team's quarterback, or give it your all?
originally posted by: firerescue
a reply to: Jacobu12
Oxygen tanks exploding
Stored in avionics compartment under the cockpit
originally posted by: Blue_Jay33
Well this thread isn't to debate if it was a plane or missile, but only to question the official narrative, that is highly illogical from even trained pilots perspectives.
Do your research please when you post links to stuff.
originally posted by: SecretSector
I couldn't hit the buildings in my first attempt.
originally posted by: SecretSector
originally posted by: Blue_Jay33
Well this thread isn't to debate if it was a plane or missile, but only to question the official narrative, that is highly illogical from even trained pilots perspectives.
Trained pilots in an exercise recreating the attack couldn't pull off the attack. Either aircraft structure failed at the speeds reported and/or all safeties off were still unable to hit the building.
I no longer have my rating, however, even with years of experience, I couldn't hit the buildings in my first attempt.
originally posted by: waypastvne
originally posted by: firerescue
a reply to: Jacobu12
Oxygen tanks exploding
Stored in avionics compartment under the cockpit
He's talking about falling debris and a piece of paper before impact right now. He hasn't got to the nose flash yet.
Waite tell he finds out about the moving bridge. That will be fun.
Question: Do you believe there was no molten steel seen by anyone after the twin towers fell down?
originally posted by: samkent
a reply to: Jacobu12
Question: Do you believe there was no molten steel seen by anyone after the twin towers fell down?
You should really start a separate thread for molten steel.
This thread is about the pentagon pilots skill level.
Jumping topics is common for people who believe in conspiracies.
They can't stand the heat of facts so they change topics.
originally posted by: Jacobu12
originally posted by: samkent
a reply to: Jacobu12
Question: Do you believe there was no molten steel seen by anyone after the twin towers fell down?
You should really start a separate thread for molten steel.
This thread is about the pentagon pilots skill level.
Jumping topics is common for people who believe in conspiracies.
They can't stand the heat of facts so they change topics.
I can't say for sure what those flashes are, so there is no point continuing the disagreement.
757 twin engines contain steel and Titanium, it matters across the board. How how come the twin engines never survived and one compressor disk did? The disk does not look melted?