It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Hillary and the DNC are also under investigation
and her people *resist* all over the place. It's basically the same you genius.
Would you let the friend of your enemy head an investigation based on no evidence against you?
originally posted by: Sublimecraft
a reply to: xuenchen
Trump should allow Mueller to see through any special council for O.O.J - Trump has said he has nothing to hide, and I can tell by his body language, he genuinely believes that so if he fires Mueller, it's not going to look good for Trump.
See through the hearings, come out vindicated. The Prez has many special privileges and he can fire Mueller as he sees fit - but he shouldn't under these circumstances - unfortunately for Trump, he has more of the fire to go through yet.
originally posted by: Metallicus
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: Aazadan
Apparently there are many Trump supporters and people on the Right that openly advocate for war against those that they politically oppose, even if their leader is found to be guilty of a crime.
Can we call them terrorists yet, or just wannabe terrorists?
I don't know. What do we call today's attack against Repubs?
Problem is this isnt political opposition. This is classic witch hunting and inquisition......rack them until they confess or give up. This makes the Mac hearings look weak. This is major psyops, abusive bully press, destroy without any evidence but by suggestion and conjecture. 3rd world.
originally posted by: xuenchen
originally posted by: Woodcarver
a reply to: xuenchen
I think it's about time they start prosecuting all of these DNC anonymous officials/leakers.
The Attorney General referred to that yesterday.
He is serious.
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: Aazadan
Apparently there are many Trump supporters and people on the Right that openly advocate for war against those that they politically oppose, even if their leader is found to be guilty of a crime.
Can we call them terrorists yet, or just wannabe terrorists?
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: Aazadan
Pure anger stoked by hate are all thats needed for a civil war these days. And there would be nothing civil about it.
originally posted by: Woodcarver
Hell yea. They are making # up about him too.
originally posted by: xuenchen
originally posted by: Woodcarver
a reply to: xuenchen
I think it's about time they start prosecuting all of these DNC anonymous officials/leakers.
The Attorney General referred to that yesterday.
He is serious.
The dnc has already stated that they plan on burying trump under litigation for the next 4 years. This is obstruction of the president's capability to operate and run the country. This is evergreen campus telling the president to go home.
originally posted by: TREESNAKE1111
originally posted by: xuenchen
originally posted by: Woodcarver
a reply to: xuenchen
I think it's about time they start prosecuting all of these DNC anonymous officials/leakers.
The Attorney General referred to that yesterday.
He is serious.
He doesn't recall remembering too consider that . Executive priviledge for everyone ! Woohoo !
originally posted by: TREESNAKE1111
originally posted by: xuenchen
originally posted by: Woodcarver
a reply to: xuenchen
I think it's about time they start prosecuting all of these DNC anonymous officials/leakers.
The Attorney General referred to that yesterday.
He is serious.
He doesn't recall remembering too consider that . Executive priviledge for everyone ! Woohoo !
originally posted by: Metallicus
I don't know. What do we call today's attack against Repubs?
Sometimes those people are terrorists, but I wouldn't call fellow American citizens terrorists yet. I don't doubt that many would support such actions if they were aimed at the right crowd, but fortunately we're not quite there yet.
originally posted by: Mike.Ockizard
a reply to: xuenchen
It took 4 people to write this story? Is that a classic sign of fake news? Which one gets blamed if its a false story?
By Devlin Barrett, Adam Entous, Ellen Nakashima and Sari Horwitz
originally posted by: Perfectenemy
a reply to: xstealth
I'm still confused how and why they keep a investigation on-going that yielded as of now zero results of any criminal activity by the accused party. A SIC member in the Sessions hearing stated that 6 months have passed and they haven't seen not one shred of evidence to support all the claims and allegations. What's up with that?