It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: frenchfries
a reply to: Phage
I remember that in my early years (80's)a official of the BND . . .
originally posted by: Soloprotocol
If there where 40 something witnesses then surely someone must have pulled out their phone and filmed it. If it was a car crash and someone was splattered all over the road at least 30 would have had it on video and it would be on liveleak by now.
originally posted by: fleabit
Within a split second the craft disappeared at a 30 degree angle into the sky. Speed appeared to faster than speed of a light turning on in a room. Within seconds it had disappeared completely.
That bit seemed contradictory. split second.. disappeared. Within seconds.. disappeared. But.. speed of light. What?
originally posted by: Thorsen
My first thought is, why would the craft need to slowly rise out of the sea, to then speed off to wherever it was going? Why not speed off right out of the water?
originally posted by: Thorsen
My first thought is, why would the craft need to slowly rise out of the sea, to then speed off to wherever it was going? Why not speed off right out of the water?
Oil rig workers and sailors are not known for spending large amounts of their working time taking selfies and generally following a photography hobby at work mate
The way it dematerialized was shocking, stark. It did not disappear gradually. The best way I can describe is that it blinked out as if a light blub turned off. It was there and in the smallest possible observable instant it was not there.
originally posted by: Mark1456
originally posted by: Thorsen
My first thought is, why would the craft need to slowly rise out of the sea, to then speed off to wherever it was going? Why not speed off right out of the water?
Good question, but who knows? Maybe if we knew exactly what the aliens were up to then we could make more sense out of what they did, but I wouldn't discount it as credible on that basis.
originally posted by: Springer
This one is interesting and recent from Tuesday 21 March, 2017...
gcaptain.com...
Reported to NUFORC here: www.nuforc.org...
Per the report:
A crew member of an offshore supply vessel in the Gulf of Mexico claims he saw a UFO ‘fives times’ the size of his vessel and UFO trackers are now looking for more witnesses to come forward with any information possibly related to the sighting.
The UFO sighting reportedly occurred on Tuesday in the Gulf of Mexico approximately 80 miles southeast of New Orleans.
There isn't much to go on but I'll ask anyway...
So, ATS, what can we dig up about this one?
originally posted by: MysterX
originally posted by: Soloprotocol
If there where 40 something witnesses then surely someone must have pulled out their phone and filmed it. If it was a car crash and someone was splattered all over the road at least 30 would have had it on video and it would be on liveleak by now.
Oil rig workers and sailors are not known for spending large amounts of their working time taking selfies and generally following a photography hobby at work mate...besides, the environment they find themselves in, isn't great combined with sensitive and flimsy consumer electronics.
Walking along a sidewalk in a city as you say, isn't as challenging or damaging to the equipment.
originally posted by: tigertatzen
originally posted by: Mark1456
originally posted by: Thorsen
My first thought is, why would the craft need to slowly rise out of the sea, to then speed off to wherever it was going? Why not speed off right out of the water?
Good question, but who knows? Maybe if we knew exactly what the aliens were up to then we could make more sense out of what they did, but I wouldn't discount it as credible on that basis.
Just curious...why would you automatically assume it was an alien craft?