It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
originally posted by: Gryphon66
I believe this man was "blaming Trump" for a rushed meaningless grandstanding poorly planned military operation that needlessly killed his son.
What has happened to basic dignity in regard to our fallen soldiers?
As I understand it the only Reason Obama did not do this mission was because it could not be done until after he left office.
That means the plan was mature before Trump even took office. How is that rushed?
We're arguing because you just said many of us are too stupid to have a position
It's a little naive of you to assume that we don't actually care about what just happened because we only need a political stick to use on Trump
Many of us were bashing Bush Sr., Clinton, Bush and Obama before Trump ever even showed up
No I didn't.
And yet your words and that of many others in this thread are examples of exactly that. Political expediency.
That's fantastic. What does that have to do with this discussion?
originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
originally posted by: Gryphon66
I believe this man was "blaming Trump" for a rushed meaningless grandstanding poorly planned military operation that needlessly killed his son.
What has happened to basic dignity in regard to our fallen soldiers?
As I understand it the only Reason Obama did not do this mission was because it could not be done until after he left office.
That means the plan was mature before Trump even took office. How is that rushed?
Some Yemen facts: 1/DoD worked up GENERAL proposal for OVERALL set of expanded authorities for these types of raids at end of Obama admin
1/DoD worked up GENERAL proposal for OVERALL set of expanded authorities for these types of raids at end of Obama admin
The broad package was discussed in the interagency in the closing weeks of the Obama term. This particular raid was NOT discussed.
Moreover no recommendation was made other than a recommendation to provide the next Administration with the necessary information.
Idea was for next team to run a deliberative process to assess risks.
And, critically, Obama made no decisions on this before leaving office, believing it represented escalation of U.S. involvement in Yemen
And therefore should not be something he decided a few days before leaving office. Obama thought the next team should take a careful look.
And run a careful process. From what I've read and heard, however, team Trump didn't do a careful vetting of the overall proposal or raid
Instead, Trump apparently had dinner with Mattis/Dunford and greenlit the op. I've heard there was a Deputies meeting the next day, but...
DC was brief and basically irrelevant since the decision had been made the night before.
So, in a nutshell, Trump and his team owns the process and the ultimate decision--and the consequences.
originally posted by: projectvxn
The reason the "people" at large don't get a say is because civilians typically do not understand these things.
They don't understand the mentality, the logic, or the structure of the military. From the planning phase, intel gathering, and operations. The military isn't a democratic process. We don't deliberate and discuss things ad nauseum. We plan the mission and execute. Losses are part of the planning. Risk assessments are made at every stage and decisions are made base on those assessments.
Despite the mitigation and planning, sometimes # goes wrong. We can argue the politics all day long. The optics too if you want, but war is a messy business.
While we are using ops like this as a political football to beat each other over the head with, decisions are going to be made for similar missions without our input.
originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: Indigo5
So you have speculation that trump spoke to Mattis?
If so should trump not listen to Mattis?
Moreover no recommendation was made other than a recommendation to provide the next Administration with the necessary information.
A full accounting of the casual and incomplete decision process has been provided multiple times.
That is also why in the past the Joint Chiefs meetings have never had political operatives like Bannon or Kushner involved..Campaign/Political appearances should not be part of the decision process involving soldiers lives and Military Missions.
originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: Indigo5
From your source ..
Moreover no recommendation was made other than a recommendation to provide the next Administration with the necessary information.
So basically everything I said was right. It was deemed ready when Obama was still in office.
Moreover no recommendation was made other than a recommendation to provide the next Administration with the necessary information.
Idea was for next team to run a deliberative process to assess risks.
And, critically, Obama made no decisions on this before leaving office, believing it represented escalation of U.S. involvement in Yemen
And therefore should not be something he decided a few days before leaving office. Obama thought the next team should take a careful look.
And run a careful process. From what I've read and heard, however, team Trump didn't do a careful vetting of the overall proposal or raid
Instead, Trump apparently had dinner with Mattis/Dunford and greenlit the op. I've heard there was a Deputies meeting the next day, but...
Obama did not reject it, he wanted it passed on to Trump.
originally posted by: UKTruth
originally posted by: matafuchs
a reply to: Indigo5
This is a political hit piece using a grieving father and a soldier. Sickening.
Correct - and it's from the usual suspects. Fortunately, the usual suspects have zero credibility.
originally posted by: Indigo5
Precisely the opposite..
originally posted by: Indigo5
It was REJECTED under the Obama Administration...and for good reason.
Moreover no recommendation was made other than a recommendation to provide the next Administration with the necessary information.
originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
originally posted by: Indigo5
Precisely the opposite..
It was presented to Obama. How was something that was believed ready by the people who create and present operations when Obama was in office rushed by Trump?
originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
I am looking for the word rejected there .. where is it again?