It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: dawnstar
a reply to: Throes
well gee, since people are so giving, why don't we just eliminate medicaid entirely, if the healthcare providers don't want to eat the cost of providing low cost to free healthcare to people, they can just start drumming for donations!!!
since the funding you are talking about is medicaid and title x....
planned parenthood can always opt to just not serve that section of the population, or just stop serving when the donated funds run out. then what??
I always hear how generous the american people are, haven't really experiences much of that generousity in my life though. the government doesn't act on it's own accord, it reacts to problems after they've been festering for some time. so, since the government has programs like social security, medicaid, rental assistance, and food stamps...
one can only assume that the american people were either unwilling or unable to be generous enough to prevent big problems from manifesting.
federal dollars are also used to fund free clinics that provide immunizations for various disease throughout the country. not to mention all the funds that are given to the drug companies to produce them... are you so confident about americans generousity that you would be willing to cut that funding and risk seeing polio come back to cripple little children, possibly you children?
originally posted by: dogstar23
a reply to: Throes
The point is that PP does a much better job of providing a lot of services for women's health which are less accessible and of lower quality elsewhere. Nobody seems to complain about the many other clinics receiving government money at the same rate in proportion to the number of women they serve which don't also provide abortion.
What I don't understand is how people can't comprehend how much money is SAVED through preventative services and screenings provide by Planned Parenthood, avoiding much greater costs down the line. Whether those costs come out of Medicaid or private insurance (leaving out the humanity aspect of reducing suffering), like it or not, in the system we have, a $250 screening and treatment for cervical cancer, paid by the government, provided by experts at PP, which avoids a future $400,000 cancer treatment expense is a great investment in my book.
As for why the comparison to for profit businesses, you said the same services can be provided elsewhere. So what? There's lots of things that can be done or had lots of places. Are you saying you only want government paid women's health to happen at for-profit clinics? Or only at non-profits which aren't Planned Parenthood?
originally posted by: dawnstar
a reply to: Throes
ya, well, I see the same problem with obamacare trying to force insane insurance policies on people. if the people know that there is no way in heck that they could afford to pay the deductible, then the insurance really isn't doing them much good. they are forced to participate just to add steam to the engine and keep the healthcare chugging along, even though they aren't really able to take advantage of the system. they are taxed out the wazoo, to others less fortunate can get health care, force to add their funds to the insurance pool, and yet, when all is said and done, if they get sick, they are more apt to just hope for the best till they die off or become debt slaves the rest of their lives.
personally, I've chosen the first option.
ya, you pay for your wives birth control yourself... you probably pay for a lot of other things yourself that others aren't in a position to pay and seek gov't help to obtain. this isn't going to change anytime in the near future I don't think. even back in colonial times, there was programs for the poor in most of the states and towns. and, there is no justifiable reason to single out birth control and just claim that it isn't as worthy as other healthcare. for a few women, it might be the most important item on their health care list, and believe me, those women aren't gonna buy your idea that a few free condoms given to them by the local county health clinic is just as good as an iud or sterilization. for a woman who knows that a pregnancy could carry a possible death sentence or some other really horrible outcome.... she's gonna want something a little more reliable or hubby and just take himself on down to the nearest whorehouse.
which is something I really wish women would start telling men!! just say no...to sex!!! it would end all this self rightous, not with my taxdollar crap!
originally posted by: veracity
a reply to: Throes
The deductables for "obamacare" were too high in redstates only bc the republican governors refused to expand medicaid. Why Obama left it up to them and did not make it a mandate...I wish I knew.
However, it is beyond the clarity of my mind why people would not want to use their tax dollars to ensure premium health insurance to take care of themselves, if not for themself...then for their families.
Intelligent people want good health insurance (especially without pre-existing conditions) and that is exactly what Obama gave us (with the exception of the crooked republican governors who did not expand medicaid at the expense of peoples lives).
Please smarten up and gain a glimpse of truth and intelligence on the subject.
And to all of you...please take care of yourselves and go get health insurance.
originally posted by: veracity
a reply to: Throes
Yes, the insurance companies will make less money than what they were making. They were robbing us blind and increasing premiums each month and dropping patients bc of pre-existing conditions just to line their pockets so a plan to make them bleed a little is not of my concern. Their hands are covered in blood anyway. To let someone die bc you want to be super-rich is not cool in my book.
If you believe they are not making a profit still, then i guess you are twisting some truths to fit your agenda.
originally posted by: veracity
a reply to: Throes
They may have made it look like they were in the red (perhaps the CEO had to sell one of his vacation houses and he thought that was red) but they will never ever ever be in the red bc of Obamacare. THey will just be making 2 million each instead of 6 million dollars each.
To me, they are not in the red. Just not as rich.