It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Bloodydagger
No her numbers are still gaining. Since when is Ga or TX even on the horizon for democrats.
It's still going to be a landslide.
originally posted by: Zanti Misfit
a reply to: TinfoilTP
Cheryl Mills Laptop -
" The FBI sought the laptop as part of its investigation, but it’s whereabouts remain unknown, the bureau said: The last time the laptop was seen was when it was put in the mail. "
That is just Beyond Belief . Why would the F.B.I. Transport Sensitive National Security Information contained on a Laptop Computer Labeled as Evidence in a Criminal Investigation through the U.S. Mail that just Happened to be " LOST " in Transit ? GTFOOH .
Maybe they " Found " the Lost Laptop ?
originally posted by: EchoesInTime
a reply to: JacKatMtn
Anthony Weiner's phone. They said they weren't sent by Hillary so it must have been Huma sending classified info.
originally posted by: Bloodydagger
Either way, this campaign can't be fun for her win or lose. That side of it has to suck for her. This wont be a pretty nomination by any means assuming she wins and this will dog her entire presidency.
originally posted by: LifeMode
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Bloodydagger
No her numbers are still gaining. Since when is Ga or TX even on the horizon for democrats.
It's still going to be a landslide.
She won't be taking TX. She does not even visit this state. Think she came once and never came back. But go ahead and believe whatever or whoever is feeding you that information, I'm just telling you right now so you won't be let down as hard.
www.nytimes.com... -hillary-clinton-email.html?_r=0
The F.B.I. is investigating illicit text messages that Mr. Weiner sent to a 15-year-old girl in North Carolina. The bureau told Congress on Friday that it had uncovered new emails related to the Clinton case — one federal official said they numbered in the thousands — potentially reigniting an issue that has weighed on the presidential campaign and offering a lifeline to Donald J. Trump less than two weeks before the election.
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: TheFlyOnTheWall
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: Wardaddy454
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: Nikola014
a reply to: Annee
Don't worry, I forgive you for not knowing what you're doing by supporting a lying, corrupted, murderous criminal.
It's the age
I realize you are a hard core die hard Trump supporter.
You defend him 100% - - no matter what.
Feel free to prove your Hillary accusations.
And as a diehard globalist/Hillary supporter you are different how?
Hillary is in the default position of the Globalist direction I want to go.
Why in heaven do you want globalization?
It's the natural progression.
We're on some insignificant rock in the middle of a vast universe.
It's just plain stupid we don't work together as a species, and protect Earth, and find a way to get off of it.
It's just plain stupid we don't work together as a species, and protect Earth, and find a way to get off of it.
originally posted by: Sillyolme
No it's not reopened. There are some emails that require review to see if they are worth investigating.
Figures the alt right will act like this is some kind of bomb shell.
It's not.
The FBI is probing new emails related to Hillary Clinton, FBI Director James Comey said in a Friday letter to lawmakers. Those new emails were discovered during an FBI investigation in which the devices of former Congressman Anthony Weiner and Clinton aide Huma Abedin were seized, The New York Times reported.
originally posted by: Nikola014
Hey people, I think we're getting carried away. We've got burned already by the FBI, so let's just take it easy, and pray to heavens the most democratic country in the world proves that she is just that
originally posted by: Nikola014
a reply to: Xcathdra
We all know there's something there, the question is, do the US institutions have the power and freedom to act against one of the most powerful US political elite family?