WTF Do These Wikileaks Numbers Mean?---BREAKING

Still not seeing anything on him being dead or alive yet. Guessing his network i still down.

Thinking back on the tweets one of them had Ecuador in it with the validation key. If for some reason he had a dead man switch for nasty details on people on the Ecuadorian Embassy and that's what is tied to that key he might be in trouble if he's not already dead. I can understand having details on them as a back up plan just in case they stab you in the back. But for it to trigger when you don't want it too would be very bad. Leaving him out on the door step would be the least that could happen.

originally posted by: MamaJ

originally posted by: corsair00
I had a WikiLeaks Insurance File from 2010 and was kind of hoping the recent tweets might contain a decryption key for them. I noticed that on archive.org there is a 375gb Insurance File uploaded from 2015 and the 88gb one from 2016.

I'd love to know what's in them. Back up - or as-yet unreleased...

www.abovetopsecret.com...

This poster claims big things..check it out because I want to understand what's going on!!!!

Ok, I've made my way through the thread and much of it is beyond me. I do get the sense, however that the OP believes that they are on the right track if not completely within the zone.

From what I can gather, they seem to give the indication that # is about to go down in a MAJOR way.

The poster who posted a PGP message and the OP of that thread are both long time members.

There is either some serious super secret squirrel stuff in the offing, or someone is entirely too deep into LARPing.

can anyone do an explanation of whats going on here for the people that dont want to read 20 pages?

So far i got that some file encryption codes were released, but i dont know for what and how do they effect the world and what kind of files?

originally posted by: redmage

originally posted by: MamaJ
a reply to: jadedANDcynical

Thank you for acknowledging the thread. Seems earth shaking especially if world bank's are threatened to be "toast".

Sorry, I've seen you link the thread a few places, but was a bit occupied to respond.

I found the thread a few hours before you started linking it.

As for your banking concern, yes, in early posts he noted a concern, but later on he responded...

originally posted by: StargateSG7
Now in terms of AES-256, on a mathematical basis, it STILL
quite secure if you are using it only for short periods of time.
(i.e. use only for minutes or less such as in banking and online
purchases and SWIFT-like bank wire transfers).

So at least some banking uses would still be considered secure in his opinion.

It certainly would be interesting if this new development could successfully crack the insurance files. From his description it seems it would still depend on how secure Wikileaks was with their passwords.

It seems the new development would have success in greatly narrowing down probable options if Wikileaks wasn't creative when it came to their passwords, but if their passwords are random letters/characters (not using actual "words"), then the method could easily discard the actual password from even being attempted... thus.. no success.

Thank you for the knowledge and education. Not that I have much in the bank...definitely would rather bury it these days but this could crumble all financial institutes within minutes. I just wonder how close we are to that actual threat?

a reply to: DocScurlock1774

Yesterday, WikiLeaks made the three referenced tweets which prompted a lot of speculation, including that Assange had been either taken into custody or killed. Subsequenly Wikileaks then tweeted that Assange's personal Internet connection had been cut off by a state (think official government, not named) agency.

The tweets contain what appear to be a hash key used to verify the content of encrypted files to ensure the files have not been tampered with.

Explanation of key used:

This is a 256 bit hex hash key.

It is likely the generated hash for a file/archive download. Basically, if you download it from the correct source and run a sha-256 sum on the archive, such as a zip...it would match that 64 bit key EXACTLY. If someone changed even 1 character in the zip, (like a bad individual)..the 64 bit hash would be 100% different.

Everything since has been speculation.

a reply to: introvert

Thanks reading now.

Upon inspection of the source data of this email, as provided by WikiLeaks, there is a canary in the coal mine pointing to this document being either a hacked or spoofed email

Still not definitive to me, but it does cast a shadow on things. Who knows maybe the Podesta people planted it themselves to start the discredit process, I put nothing past them lol.

One thing I do know, besides trusting none of them in DC, is that I will NEVER underestimate Russia and what they are capable of. People look to them as the exposes of truth, whereas I never ever forget they are motivated by reasons to destabilize the US. That is their primary goal and should never be forgotten.

One thing that raised my spidey senses as a possible alteration by Russia was the use of the term Wet Works. It's a KGB term "mokroye delo",. It made me think hmmm, did Putins peeps make a cultural mistake?

originally posted by: jadedANDcynical

originally posted by: MamaJ

originally posted by: corsair00
I had a WikiLeaks Insurance File from 2010 and was kind of hoping the recent tweets might contain a decryption key for them. I noticed that on archive.org there is a 375gb Insurance File uploaded from 2015 and the 88gb one from 2016.

I'd love to know what's in them. Back up - or as-yet unreleased...

www.abovetopsecret.com...

This poster claims big things..check it out because I want to understand what's going on!!!!

Ok, I've made my way through the thread and much of it is beyond me. I do get the sense, however that the OP believes that they are on the right track if not completely within the zone.

From what I can gather, they seem to give the indication that # is about to go down in a MAJOR way.

The poster who posted a PGP message and the OP of that thread are both long time members.

There is either some serious super secret squirrel stuff in the offing, or someone is entirely too deep into LARPing.

Them being long time members is what sparked me asking around to make sense of it because I'm like you it's beyond me.

Reading through it the best I can I've come to the same conclusion as you.

I wonder... How long will it take for people to blow financial institutes off the books?

a reply to: jadedANDcynical

I having a nagging question. Why would either the UK, the US, or anyone else want to provoke the release of what they must know to be damaging files, with just cutting an internet connection? Are they testing the waters somehow? Trying to see what kind of world reaction would happen if they make a move against Assange? Perhaps wanting to get their hands on the keys? This whole thing just does not add up for me?

originally posted by: DocScurlock1774
can anyone do an explanation of whats going on here for the people that dont want to read 20 pages?

The quoted post below is probably the explanation.
Summary:

Today he is being interviewed by Ecuador regrading the Swedish rape charges.
Kerry is in London also.
Pamela Anderson made him a seksi vegan meal, she may or may not have poisoned him.
Oh and he isn't dead.

originally posted by: ab0vean0n
The numbers are checksums of files before committing (uploading) them to a repository. It seems like they are using some type of revision control system like Subversion (SVN) or the now famous GitHub.

In security controlled systems it is sometimes necessary to publish a checksum through official channels before committing (pre-commitment) the files to a repository / server. This allows everyone who plans on accessing the files to know if they were tampered with during upload, or after upload, or at any time.

a reply to: flyingdutchman2112

And in the end they wind up with a room full of birds and some entertainers.

a reply to: Witness2008

Well you're not alone there. A good number of people are trying to figure out the angle and all the players on the field so far. Problem is it's not a short list. I'm just happy it hasn't been linked to aliens yet.

I wonder if they knew already about the dead man switches he had in place. Who and how they got the info I don't know, but know that would help.

regarding "they" "cutting off his internet"

as an IT specialist I find this pretty strange


he is housed at the embassy of equador correct? so was it the equador government who cut it off? it almost had to be.

also, doesnt mr assange have a couple of dummy phones with 3g/4g access ? how could they shut that off.

and if equador embassy still has internet, and they are not responsible for cutting out his internet, then why dont he just surf on their internet.

like i said, i find it really strange.
its not like anyone know who is using the internet if you are using anonymous computers with for example tails OS on it and never use camera, voice, or personal information on it.

a reply to: SwagLord

I agree with your assertions...Not buying he doesn't have internet.

a reply to: MamaJ

Thanks, but please take my breakdown with a grain of salt. I could be off base on the whole, but he certainly does describe a process that still relies on brute force (try everything) "basic English-language dictionary attacks"; however, using one that attempts to greatly narrow down the probable possibilities before attempting to brute force with the remaining possibilities.

originally posted by: IAMTAT

originally posted by: SudoNim

originally posted by: IAMTAT

originally posted by: interupt42

originally posted by: dianajune
I'd like to know what Wikileaks' contingency plans are. I think they should just release everything they've got now.

If he did than he would likely be committing suicide, via 5 shots to the back of the head.

Assange has Obama/Clinton/Kerry by the balls. He is actually safer than any of us.

Yup he has them by the balls as he cowers inside the Ecuadorean embassy hiding from rape allegations. What a life.

When was the last time Pamela Anderson brought YOU lunch?

Is that supposed to be impressive? It's not something I would use to evaluate my quality of life. I'm sure Clinton and Obama are starving.

a reply to: MamaJ

Al ready seeing a few reports that he's alive. But nothing with any good backing.

Anonymous Julian Assange dead or alive ? WE HAVE THE ANSWER !

Maybe we'll see a few more soon with better details and backing. Like talking to him directly.

originally posted by: redmage

originally posted by: SudoNim
Yup he has them by the balls as he cowers inside the Ecuadorean embassy hiding from rape allegations.

It was my understanding that the "rape charge" was highly questionable (by most standards) due to a strange Swedish law that says something to the effect of 'consensual unwed intercourse, without the use of a condom, is considered "lesser-degree rape" by the state'.

I do know that of the charges he faced, the statute of limitations has expired on all but the "lesser-degree rape" charge.

The charges seem to stem from two women going to the state to simply request that he be tested for STDs. Not anyone claiming they were "raped" in the traditional, non-consensual, western understanding of the term.

Phew! As long as it's your understanding then ipso facto they must be false. I guess if he didn't break the law he wouldn't be on the run, oh wait, its for his own protection, convenient.

Wikileaks is still at it today, having released 100 pages of FBI files on clinton less than an hour ago. twitter.com... I have seen nothing more on the state of Assange or his connection to the world.

originally posted by: Denoli

originally posted by: stinkelbaum
is everybody's favourite rapist dead yet?

Why is bill Clinton ill

originally posted by: hillbilly4rent

originally posted by: stinkelbaum
is everybody's favourite rapist dead yet?

Last time heard WJC was still kicking

So he's your favourite rapist? Wow guys.