It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Help ATS via PayPal:
learn more

WTF Do These Wikileaks Numbers Mean?---BREAKING

page: 20
174
<< 17  18  19    21  22  23 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 17 2016 @ 11:03 AM
link   
Ah. So this is setting up the charge that Wiki has been hacked when their supposed dumps are proven to be fraudulent???

Welcome to the post-fact era.




posted on Oct, 17 2016 @ 11:03 AM
link   
a reply to: FauxMulder

Whoever.
So long as it's in US hands.

I don't understand why people want Russia,China Iran or anyone else to have state secret information. It is traitorous in my mind.

edit on 17-10-2016 by zazzafrazz because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 17 2016 @ 11:04 AM
link   
a reply to: Sparkymedic




I must say, when I read what Mitchell wrote to Podesta about ET....kinda made me shake my head.


I believe that was an email associated to a spam account.



posted on Oct, 17 2016 @ 11:04 AM
link   
a reply to: jadedANDcynical

Thank you for acknowledging the thread. Seems earth shaking especially if world bank's are threatened to be "toast". Not sure if there is any credibility with the poster. Makes Clinton emails look like a fairy tale book if it's credible!!



posted on Oct, 17 2016 @ 11:05 AM
link   
The thread is growing so quickly, has anyone pointed out we may be seeing a very bad day coming for John Kerry and the UK Government?



posted on Oct, 17 2016 @ 11:06 AM
link   

originally posted by: zazzafrazz
a reply to: FauxMulder

Whoever.
So long as it's in US hands.

I don't understand why people want Russia,China Iran or anyone else to have state secret information. It is traitorous in my mind.


Totally agree!!! If it relates to the American people being wronged that's one thing but national security threat is another...my opinion of course.



posted on Oct, 17 2016 @ 11:09 AM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66
Ah. So this is setting up the charge that Wiki has been hacked when their supposed dumps are proven to be fraudulent???

Welcome to the post-fact era.


Hi Gryph,
Can you link what you are referring to?
I missed the part where the Podesta Dumps have been proven to be fraudulent



posted on Oct, 17 2016 @ 11:10 AM
link   

originally posted by: raymundoko
The thread is growing so quickly, has anyone pointed out we may be seeing a very bad day coming for John Kerry and the UK Government?


Yes about 7 years ago

Don't worry I asked the same thing last night about 6 pages ago .



posted on Oct, 17 2016 @ 11:10 AM
link   
a reply to: zazzafrazz

Gryph is full of it. The only person saying they are fraudulent is Podesta and he doesn't even say that. He says some of them appear to have been "altered" but he has not been specific and the recipients/senders who have been contacted by the media are refusing to comment.



posted on Oct, 17 2016 @ 11:12 AM
link   
a reply to: raymundoko

Chllax, be nice.

He made the claim, I am happy to wait for the reply without name calling.



posted on Oct, 17 2016 @ 11:14 AM
link   
I had a WikiLeaks Insurance File from 2010 and was kind of hoping the recent tweets might contain a decryption key for them. I noticed that on archive.org there is a 375gb Insurance File uploaded from 2015 and the 88gb one from 2016.

I'd love to know what's in them. Back up - or as-yet unreleased...



posted on Oct, 17 2016 @ 11:16 AM
link   
is everybody's favourite rapist dead yet?



posted on Oct, 17 2016 @ 11:17 AM
link   

originally posted by: corsair00
I had a WikiLeaks Insurance File from 2010 and was kind of hoping the recent tweets might contain a decryption key for them. I noticed that on archive.org there is a 375gb Insurance File uploaded from 2015 and the 88gb one from 2016.

I'd love to know what's in them. Back up - or as-yet unreleased...


www.abovetopsecret.com...

This poster claims big things..check it out because I want to understand what's going on!!!!



posted on Oct, 17 2016 @ 11:19 AM
link   

originally posted by: stinkelbaum
is everybody's favourite rapist dead yet?


Last time heard WJC was still kicking



posted on Oct, 17 2016 @ 11:24 AM
link   

originally posted by: zazzafrazz
a reply to: raymundoko

Chllax, be nice.

He made the claim, I am happy to wait for the reply without name calling.


There are some indications that some of the emails may have been altered or faked.

www.occupycorporatism.com...



posted on Oct, 17 2016 @ 11:29 AM
link   

originally posted by: zazzafrazz
a reply to: FauxMulder

Whoever.
So long as it's in US hands.

I don't understand why people want Russia,China Iran or anyone else to have state secret information. It is traitorous in my mind.


I'm sure the Russians, Chinese ETC already have this info. That's why its such a big deal she was sending classified info on her private server. DOJ, or whomever as you say is complicit in trying to cover that up.
edit on 17-10-2016 by FauxMulder because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 17 2016 @ 11:32 AM
link   



posted on Oct, 17 2016 @ 11:32 AM
link   

originally posted by: stinkelbaum
is everybody's favourite rapist dead yet?


Why is bill Clinton ill



posted on Oct, 17 2016 @ 11:34 AM
link   

originally posted by: MamaJ
a reply to: jadedANDcynical

Thank you for acknowledging the thread. Seems earth shaking especially if world bank's are threatened to be "toast".


Sorry, I've seen you link the thread a few places, but was a bit occupied to respond.

I found the thread a few hours before you started linking it.

As for your banking concern, yes, in early posts he noted a concern, but later on he responded...


originally posted by: StargateSG7
Now in terms of AES-256, on a mathematical basis, it STILL
quite secure if you are using it only for short periods of time.
(i.e. use only for minutes or less such as in banking and online
purchases and SWIFT-like bank wire transfers).


So at least some banking uses would still be considered secure in his opinion.

It certainly would be interesting if this new development could successfully crack the insurance files. From his description it seems it would still depend on how secure Wikileaks was with their passwords.

It seems the new development would have success in greatly narrowing down probable options if Wikileaks wasn't creative when it came to their passwords, but if their passwords are random letters/characters (not using actual "words"), then the method could easily discard the actual password from even being attempted... thus.. no success.

In short, it still relies on "brute force" (try everything until it opens). It simply attempts to greatly reduce the "everything" before it actually tries the remaining options (those deemed probable based on human tendencies when creating passwords).
edit on 10/17/16 by redmage because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 17 2016 @ 11:39 AM
link   
a reply to: FauxMulder




I'm sure the Russians, Chinese ETC already have this info.


Well so long as you're sure, that's good enough for me to take as gospel and start panicking.




top topics



 
174
<< 17  18  19    21  22  23 >>

log in

join