It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: TheFlyOnTheWall
Not much to say right now, just tuning in. Current question, why did you give immunity for Cheryl Mill's laptop?
judiciary.house.gov...
originally posted by: TheFlyOnTheWall
a reply to: Tjoran
comey is on fire right now. Trying to deny any link between the emails and reddit and what was being attempted
originally posted by: network dude
a reply to: Krazysh0t
so justice is only important if it's against the other side then?
Seriously, WTF is wrong with trying to find out why the FBI screwed up so badly on this? I'd like to see after a Republican gets control and puts his folks where he wants them and anything remotely close to the corruption shown here happens. You SJW's will explode into tiny bits of oppressed matter.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
...
Is that what we are calling witch hunts these days? Maybe one day you'll study our country's judicial system and learn that the public doesn't convict people in our country.
originally posted by: LifeMode
The format of these hearings are a joke. The topics are all over the place. They should stick to an outline of topics and not veer off on other tangents. If we are on the subject of the Hillary stay on that topic. If someone wants to bring up Trump stay on that topic. Very annoying and counterproductive proceedings and nothing ever comes out of them but rhetoric and political pandering.
originally posted by: Tjoran
originally posted by: TheFlyOnTheWall
a reply to: Tjoran
comey is on fire right now. Trying to deny any link between the emails and reddit and what was being attempted
Liar Liar Pants On Fire?
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: lordcomac
So what you are saying is that for EVERY investigation the FBI undertakes, Congress should second guess them and question their decision incessantly? After all, the investigator could be corrupt right?
PS: I really enjoy watching people label James Comey, a Republican appointed by Bush jr., as on the take to the Democrats. THAT is hilarious.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: network dude
a reply to: Krazysh0t
so justice is only important if it's against the other side then?
What justice? Congress is questioning Comey over his decision to not indict someone. What justice is missing? To me this looks like Congress second guessing a professional law enforcement officer's opinion because they want the opposite to be true. I see no justice involved with what is occurring today over at Congress. All I see is a perversion of justice instead. Political pandering under the GUISE of justice.
Though as an aside I was right about saying that a bunch of right leaning Americans would all get hot and bothered over this. Thanks for proving my point.
Seriously, WTF is wrong with trying to find out why the FBI screwed up so badly on this? I'd like to see after a Republican gets control and puts his folks where he wants them and anything remotely close to the corruption shown here happens. You SJW's will explode into tiny bits of oppressed matter.
Is that what we are calling witch hunts these days? Maybe one day you'll study our country's judicial system and learn that the public doesn't convict people in our country.