It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Comey being grilled live now

page: 2
31
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 28 2016 @ 10:40 AM
link   

originally posted by: lordcomac

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: lordcomac

So what you are saying is that for EVERY investigation the FBI undertakes, Congress should second guess them and question their decision incessantly? After all, the investigator could be corrupt right?

PS: I really enjoy watching people label James Comey, a Republican appointed by Bush jr., as on the take to the Democrats. THAT is hilarious.


No- don't be silly.
Just the ones cases there's considerable evidence that the FBI is implicated in intentionally misleading their own investigation to cover up crimes perpetrated by the politicians they're investigating in.

They're supposed to be considering said evidence, but I suspect they're not because half of congress is likely in on the scam, too.


So basically all the cases that partisanship deems it ok to label someone guilty until proven innocent then. IE political witch hunts.

I notice that there is no evidence to suggest that Comey is on the take is ever presented, but that hasn't stopped everyone from assuming he is guilty and supporting Congress in this affront to our justice system.
edit on 28-9-2016 by Krazysh0t because: (no reason given)




posted on Sep, 28 2016 @ 10:43 AM
link   
a reply to: Sillyolme

Oh yeah! Good point. This is the second time they've questioned him over this.



posted on Sep, 28 2016 @ 10:45 AM
link   

originally posted by: lordcomac
Is it really a witch hunt, though? What if the head of the FBI really was bought out by a crooked politician? *should* that person have a shot at being potus?

Even if it wasn't blatantly obvious that the fbi along with most of the rest of the government was a bunch of bribe sucking worms, it would *still* make sense to investigate the possibility.

when george w bush had a similar email issue, on a much larger scale and while president, where were judicial watch, the folks that launched these claims?
where were you, and all the others demanding a firing squad?

look at some of your own wording,

What if the head of the FBI really was bought out by a crooked politician?

you have bought in fully that somebody's guilty already, probably by the lies repeated daily, pointing to a witch hunt.

when this gets thrown out again, when judicial watch launch another trial again, will you still be demanding blood or, actually have a look at the wider picture?
remember judicial watch still have trials pending about obama's birth place.



posted on Sep, 28 2016 @ 10:51 AM
link   

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: Sillyolme

Oh yeah! Good point. This is the second time they've questioned him over this.


I'm so over this.

And, yes, you are right. The GOP didn't like the first outcome. Now they're trying to force it to change.

With tax payer money.


+6 more 
posted on Sep, 28 2016 @ 10:51 AM
link   
A plethora of information coming out today.



Not good for the Clinton Campaign.



posted on Sep, 28 2016 @ 10:52 AM
link   
It's on C-Span



posted on Sep, 28 2016 @ 10:54 AM
link   
a reply to: Annee

I was over this when the initial pronouncement from Comey that no indictment would be forthcoming happened. Though I knew (and called) that the Republicans were only just getting started. After all they had the Benghazi witch hunt as a model to base this witch hunt on.


+10 more 
posted on Sep, 28 2016 @ 10:55 AM
link   
Awesome so if I can destroy the evidence then I can do whatever I want because they don't have the evidence to prove it!?!

Even if I am the one the destroys the evidence! BS!



posted on Sep, 28 2016 @ 10:58 AM
link   
Says Jane and Joe Smith wouldnt have been prosecuted based on evidence in clinton email case.
Well that puts that baby to bed.

Oh but if it had been me....
Well here the FBI is saying no even if it had been a regular citizen.



posted on Sep, 28 2016 @ 10:58 AM
link   
a reply to: Martin75

Pretty much. If you don't have the evidence you don't have it.


+5 more 
posted on Sep, 28 2016 @ 11:01 AM
link   
It is a pretty genius plan to sell info.

Put it on a unsecured server and claim your old.

Watch the donations run in. Millions of dollars for an external HD in your basement.

I'm in the wrong business.



posted on Sep, 28 2016 @ 11:02 AM
link   
a reply to: Annee

The best reason to vote party lines on the ballot. Get these bastard out of the house.



posted on Sep, 28 2016 @ 11:03 AM
link   
CSpan changed programming.

edit on 9282016 by Sillyolme because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 28 2016 @ 11:05 AM
link   
a reply to: Sillyolme
Perfect timing on the switch it seems. I don't want to see the House Committee!!!




posted on Sep, 28 2016 @ 11:07 AM
link   

originally posted by: Mandroid7
It is a pretty genius plan to sell info.

Put it on a unsecured server and claim your old.

Watch the donations run in. Millions of dollars for an external HD in your basement.

I'm in the wrong business.



You're a fiction writer aren't you?



posted on Sep, 28 2016 @ 11:09 AM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Annee

The best reason to vote party lines on the ballot. Get these bastard out of the house.


YES!

The "vice grip" control and obstructionism - - is not OK.



posted on Sep, 28 2016 @ 11:17 AM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

Any mention of the $6B that went "missing"??? Isn't it funny how I'm caught up in the "missing" $$$, Me and 3 other guys, but still with the deleted e-mail fart jokes? Where is the 'dead horse' emoji?

Here is a BIG HINT: Nobody gives a snip. The debates topic was "Cyber Security" yet NOTHING was mentioned by the Moderator and nothing mentioned by the Clinton Cabal's shill 'Lil Donny'..

Ever wonder what happens to snotty nosed rich kids when they grow up?? They run their businesses into the ground 6x and then when their 7th Bankruptcy is "denied" they run to their rich friends and then run for President to get Your debts wiped clean by Your opponent's very own 'slush fund' that they call 'The Clinton Foundation™'...

Who wants to bet that We will NEVER see Donny's taxes and not because the bigger CROOK won't reveal the 30,000+ e-mails She tried to delete...

How many of the e-mails You receive do You delete w/out looking at them?



posted on Sep, 28 2016 @ 11:20 AM
link   
a reply to: Krazysh0t

There was like 10 million set apart for Zika and water "stuff"...heard today.



posted on Sep, 28 2016 @ 11:21 AM
link   

originally posted by: tadaman
a reply to: Krazysh0t

There was like 10 million set apart for Zika and water "stuff"...heard today.


Source? Because I haven't read anything about any Zika announcements from Congress. Not saying you are lying, but just haven't seen anything.



posted on Sep, 28 2016 @ 11:36 AM
link   

originally posted by: Krazysh0t

Is that what we are calling witch hunts these days? Maybe one day you'll study our country's judicial system and learn that the public doesn't convict people in our country.


Tell that to BLM.




top topics



 
31
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join