It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: Grambler
This means that either Combetta comes clean about who it was, or he has violated his immunity, and you arrest him.
That is different than the statement I was replying to. That is much more reasonable than simply saying someone is guilty, but we don't know who, charges need to be filed anyway.
Can you imagine law enforcement closing a case in any other scenario where they knew that one of two people broke the law? Whats that, one of these two people robbed a bank? Well there is two possibilities, so thats it, close the case. It just doesn't make sense.
It doesn't when you frame the scenario in that way. No matter the number of possibilities, you still have to have proof to charge someone.
originally posted by: Steak
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: Grambler
This means that either Combetta comes clean about who it was, or he has violated his immunity, and you arrest him.
That is different than the statement I was replying to. That is much more reasonable than simply saying someone is guilty, but we don't know who, charges need to be filed anyway.
Can you imagine law enforcement closing a case in any other scenario where they knew that one of two people broke the law? Whats that, one of these two people robbed a bank? Well there is two possibilities, so thats it, close the case. It just doesn't make sense.
It doesn't when you frame the scenario in that way. No matter the number of possibilities, you still have to have proof to charge someone.
introvert - we can sit here and ask questions all day. The simple fact is HRC broke several laws here, and continues to cover up these events. You are losing all credibility here.
originally posted by: whyamIhere
The fix was in...
Every honest person knows it.