It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Krahzeef_Ukhar
a reply to: GailNot
Fair enough.
I guess the purpose of the OP is to find a way to argue with people against what they have "felt".
If a successful argument can be made to convince ME'ers they are wrong then perhaps other more dangerous doctrines which rely on what people have felt can be argued against too.
Just trying to hone my strategy however my poorly thought out OP probably won't be that helpful.
originally posted by: Orborus
originally posted by: GailNot
Imagine this: If there are infinite possibilities, you do realize that you and you alone only exist because your mom laid down and had relations with your dad at a certain exact time. And out of all of the hundreds of millions of sperm the exact one that you are reached the egg in your mom at the exact time it did for you to be alive.
And you expect us to believe this happens over and over again in infinite universes but nothing else remains the same?
You do realize the chances of that even happening are a lot better than you coming about by chance. Your very being alive is beyond all chances of any lottery. Think about that.
Just because there are 'infinite possibilities' (or essentially infinite from our perspective) doesn't mean it necessarily includes infinite variety (you could have an infinite number of the integer 1 for example).
There may be a great many parallel offshoots of our universe and its symbolic history, a person remaining in 'one' single version (ie. their birth universe) might be the true statistical improbability. We're constantly moving up or down the chain to very similar -- but not exactly identical -- parallel variants of our symbolic universe. Sometimes we can take bigger leaps but how one goes about this I can't say at this time. Still much to learn and codify about this process, if indeed this is a real 'process' at all.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: Krahzeef_Ukhar
People who claim to experience the Mandela Effect are just too proud to admit they are misremembering things.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: GailNot
Well how these things usually go is that someone misremembers something, sees the correct form, then says "That ain't right! It's clearly XYZ!" That's what I mean by being too proud. Many times these same people will turn to questionable sources like Youtube videos to confirm their biases, "See! Here are other people in the world that remember it as I do!" Uh no... They just remembered it wrong too.
I consider "Hmmm, I was sure it was X" as experiencing the Mandela Effect.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
People who claim to experience the Mandela Effect are just too proud to admit they are misremembering things.
originally posted by: Krahzeef_Ukhar
a reply to: Argentbenign
Thanks, may I ask if english is your first language?
Just due to the signature.
Is there anyone who has never experienced the Mandela Effect?
originally posted by: Krahzeef_Ukhar
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
People who claim to experience the Mandela Effect are just too proud to admit they are misremembering things.
On the same note it seems that some people who misremember things are too proud to call it the Mandela Effect also.
You cannot explain Deja Vu to someone by saying it doesn't exist.
originally posted by: Krahzeef_Ukhar
Is there anyone who has never experienced the Mandela Effect?