It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Bill and Hillary Clinton and the Clinton Foundation have been hit with a racketeering lawsuit in Florida court. The lawsuit, filed by Larry Klayman of Freedom Watch, includes a legal request to have the Florida judge seize the private server on which Hillary Clinton and her aides hosted their emails while she served as secretary of state.
A federal judge has dismissed a racketeering case accusing former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton of giving out official favors in exchange for financial contributions to her family foundation.
The long-shot lawsuit from conservative legal activist Larry Klayman was filed in March and tossed out Tuesday because Klayman did not have standing to sue and was unable to show the depth of the Clintons' alleged criminal enterprise.
Klayman’s court filings do “not allege any facts” to support his claim that he has been hurt by the Clintons’ alleged scheme, Judge Donald Middlebrooks wrote.
“Critically, [Klayman] fails to allege how [Clinton’s] mail or wire fraud, which allegedly involved obtaining money from others, directly injured [him].” Middlebrooks added. “Therefore, the relationship between [Clinton’s] mail or wire fraud and [Klayman’s] alleged compromised ability to earn a living is too remote” to meet the legal test.
originally posted by: jimmyx
it's fake....this article is from may of 2015... and the Washington examiner is just above the national enquirer in truth telling in regard to anything left or liberal
As stated in the report, State Department protocol and guidelines correlate to existing laws regarding record keeping and the handling of classified data. Now that Clinton can’t simply claim “convenience,” there’s the obvious intent to hide information.
originally posted by: jimmyx
it's fake....this article is from may of 2015... and the Washington examiner is jus.......
originally posted by: BIGPoJo
originally posted by: jimmyx
it's fake....this article is from may of 2015... and the Washington examiner is just above the national enquirer in truth telling in regard to anything left or liberal
The Examiner article is, that is because that is when that particular lawsuit was filed. I guess you don't understand how slow or fast these types of cases unfold.
originally posted by: jimmyx
originally posted by: BIGPoJo
originally posted by: jimmyx
it's fake....this article is from may of 2015... and the Washington examiner is just above the national enquirer in truth telling in regard to anything left or liberal
The Examiner article is, that is because that is when that particular lawsuit was filed. I guess you don't understand how slow or fast these types of cases unfold.
the title is a lie.....if she was going to indicted for racketeering, it would have been all over the news by now, guaranteed.
originally posted by: syrinx high priest
that's a 5/29/15 article/event from what I can tell