It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Hillary Clinton to be indicted on racketeering charges.

page: 22
92
<< 19  20  21   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 2 2016 @ 04:13 PM
link   

originally posted by: Bspiracy

originally posted by: jimmyx
it's fake....this article is from may of 2015... and the Washington examiner is jus.......


If you read the link you would have seen it's current.

Interesting article. Its well written, linked, and doesnt read like a fake.
Curious to why it went up then down..

The article is too complex and fact driven for a simple hoax

B


News agencies often have potential stories written up ready to go, in order to be the first for breaking news. Occasionally they will even have multiple variations based on what they think might happen, then tweak and publish the one closest to the confirmed event.

Sometimes (as possibly happened here) they accidentally hit "publish" instead of "preview", or someone forgot that the guy feeding them info asked them to hold off until the official announcement.




posted on Jul, 2 2016 @ 07:54 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: BIGPoJo

Oh Twitter lol it's not on MSNBC it's not on CNN I don't even think Fox is running with this.


Do you really think MSNBC or CNN would run with anything even remotely negative to Hillary? You mean MSNBC where the unbiased debate moderator Rachel Maddow hugged Hillary after a debate? Please, Hillary can go without a colonoscopy for the next eight years, they have their heads buried so far up her arse.



posted on Jul, 3 2016 @ 08:22 AM
link   
a reply to: UnBreakable

Of course they would. They have and they will continue to in the future.
What ever the news headlines that get viewers is that's what they go with.



posted on Jul, 3 2016 @ 08:26 AM
link   
a reply to: BIGPoJo

Just how are you feeling today with the rumors that FBI is not recommending an indictment?
How is that sitting with the vultures?



posted on Jul, 3 2016 @ 08:52 AM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: BIGPoJo

Just how are you feeling today with the rumors that FBI is not recommending an indictment?
How is that sitting with the vultures?


So you're calling people who hope for an indictment vultures? And you have the audacity to bitch when you accuse people of calling you names? Usual lib hypocrisy.



posted on Jul, 3 2016 @ 08:59 AM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: BIGPoJo

Just how are you feeling today with the rumors that FBI is not recommending an indictment?
How is that sitting with the vultures?



Just an ugly rumor, I'm sure.

No way will she not be charged for something, even if it doesn't have any jail or fines or whatever.

Just enough to ruin her life. lol!! Sorry, can't help it.






posted on Jul, 3 2016 @ 04:44 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: BIGPoJo

Just how are you feeling today with the rumors that FBI is not recommending an indictment?
How is that sitting with the vultures?


I have been too busy drinking beer to hear about any rumors. Got any links?



posted on Jul, 3 2016 @ 08:41 PM
link   
a reply to: UnBreakable

I guess I learned a thing or two from all the name calling. Not that vulture is so terrible. They're actually graceful flyers and serve a useful purpose.



posted on Jul, 3 2016 @ 09:35 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: UnBreakable

.....serve a useful purpose.


Unlike Hillary sycophants.



posted on Jul, 3 2016 @ 11:56 PM
link   
a reply to: Sillyolme

Those rumors are coming from the left / supporters of Hillary. I wouldn't put to much stock in it.



new topics

top topics



 
92
<< 19  20  21   >>

log in

join