Pakistani husbands can ‘lightly beat’ their wives, Islamic council says

originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: MysticPearl

Have you ever seen pictures of Afghanistan before the US funded the Taliban?

Yes. Unfortunately the more extreme branch of Islam put and end to that.

originally posted by: onequestion
a reply to: introvert

So your denying that their religion is A, not a common factor and B, plays no role?

"yawn"

What I am saying is that those factors and roles are prevalent among many Right Wing ideologies that are not necessarily limited to the faithful.

a reply to: introvert

I think it's bad anywhere it happens.

It's even worse when a religion sanctions it officially.

a reply to: introvert

Mass Murderers of the 20th Century..

Mao Zedong tops the list

Josef Stalin dishonorable second place

Adolf Hitler probable third

a reply to: Phage

Ahhh wonderful, finally input thats relevant.

Thanks, much appreciated!

a reply to: onequestion

I know it will never work like that but it should be. ....

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: onequestion
a reply to: introvert

So your denying that their religion is A, not a common factor and B, plays no role?

"yawn"

What I am saying is that those factors and roles are prevalent among many Right Wing ideologies that are not necessarily limited to the faithful.

So what are you even trying to say with that statement?

Can you more clearly articulate your perspective so that people actually know what your saying instead of making such vague comments about the right wing?

Or are you really trying to make this some right vs left paradigm debate thats completely off topic and ridiculous in the first place.

a reply to: onequestion

He's saying that anyone that doesn't adhere to socialist practices like him, rape children and beat women.

originally posted by: SomeDumbBroad
a reply to: Kali74

So what Christian churches are calling for the bombing of countries that are majorly Islam?

Last I checked, churches do not make that call, government does.

Another HUGE leap. I said nothing remotely close to that.

a reply to: Kali74

So why don't you explain what you actually meant instead of just denying whats been proposed to clarify for anyone following the conversation???

a reply to: onequestion

There's nothing vague or inarticulate in his post.

a reply to: Kali74

So who is dong the bombing you are talking about, then?

a reply to: Kali74

YOUR post Kali, why don't you clarify YOUR post.

a reply to: onequestion

Shall I get my crayons?

a reply to: Kali74

Thats what I thought...

a reply to: onequestion

Can you more clearly articulate your perspective so that people actually know what your saying instead of making such vague comments about the right wing?

It's pretty clear, if you ask me.

Religion is a second-hand factor when compared to an overall Right Wing ideology.

Human rights in general are threatened more by the latter.

originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: onequestion

Shall I get my crayons?

Don't make things complicated.

a reply to: SomeDumbBroad

I didn't talk about anyone doing the bombing. You posted that Christians weren't C A L L I N G for the beheadings of Islamists. I said no, just for bombing the crap out of them and turning the desert to glass.

You see the difference right?

a reply to: introvert

Can you explain the right wing ideology?

Thats pretty vague.

What right wing ideology are we talking about?

a reply to: introvert

Yeah, socialists never beat their wives or rape children, right?