It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I was not aware of that!
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: KTemplar
For the record I have nothing against transgendered - I only fear the wrongdoers posing as one to get closer to children - BTK posed as a utility worker, Ted Bundy feigned broken arms to manipulate his victims. Hopefully, companies will eventually add a new restroom for transgenders level of comfort as well!
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: KTemplar
Live and let live is usually my motto - my only concern with the bathroom thing is how long before serial killers and rapist take advantage of an opportunity like this?
There's been 3 Republicans arrested for bathroom misconduct.
Zero trans.
The law is targeting the wrong people.
This law is mostly meant to target students. You know, kids K-12.
That's who's been making headlines. Transgender students and their parents wanting to be inclusive, not excluded or made to feel different.
That's what this is about.
Would your school allow a utility worker in the kids bathroom if kids were in there?
This is about the schools. Not the malls
originally posted by: KTemplar
I was not aware of that! Everything I read on the Curt Schilling incident referred to "Men's rooms and Woman's rooms".
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: KTemplar
For the record I have nothing against transgendered - I only fear the wrongdoers posing as one to get closer to children - BTK posed as a utility worker, Ted Bundy feigned broken arms to manipulate his victims. Hopefully, companies will eventually add a new restroom for transgenders level of comfort as well!
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: KTemplar
Live and let live is usually my motto - my only concern with the bathroom thing is how long before serial killers and rapist take advantage of an opportunity like this?
There's been 3 Republicans arrested for bathroom misconduct.
Zero trans.
The law is targeting the wrong people.
This law is mostly meant to target students. You know, kids K-12.
That's who's been making headlines. Transgender students and their parents wanting to be inclusive, not excluded or made to feel different.
That's what this is about.
Would your school allow a utility worker in the kids bathroom if kids were in there?
This is about the schools. Not the malls
originally posted by: KTemplar
I was not aware of that!
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: KTemplar
For the record I have nothing against transgendered - I only fear the wrongdoers posing as one to get closer to children - BTK posed as a utility worker, Ted Bundy feigned broken arms to manipulate his victims. Hopefully, companies will eventually add a new restroom for transgenders level of comfort as well!
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: KTemplar
Live and let live is usually my motto - my only concern with the bathroom thing is how long before serial killers and rapist take advantage of an opportunity like this?
There's been 3 Republicans arrested for bathroom misconduct.
Zero trans.
The law is targeting the wrong people.
This law is mostly meant to target students. You know, kids K-12.
That's who's been making headlines. Transgender students and their parents wanting to be inclusive, not excluded or made to feel different.
That's what this is about.
Would your school allow a utility worker in the kids bathroom if kids were in there?
This is about the schools. Not the malls
In a landmark ruling, the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals held on Tuesday that federal law bars public schools from denying trans students access to the bathroom that aligns with their gender identity. The 2–1 decision afforded deference to the federal government’s interpretation of existing law to protect trans students from discrimination. Under that interpretation, the court held, public schools cannot exclude trans students from the bathroom. The ruling puts North Carolina’s new bathroom restrictions in direct conflict with federal law and clear judicial precedent. www.slate.com...
originally posted by: yuppa
a reply to: StoutBroux
read my link. it explains Gender and sex quite well if you read it. and there are soem hell a mannish women out there who are natural so its not always so easy to tell i sit?
Transgender is a less clinical term, referring more to gender identity and gender expression than to sexual orientation or physical sex characteristics. It is also a more general and inclusive term: a transgender person may be gay, transsexual, transvestite, or even genderqueer.
originally posted by: StoutBroux
So if say a man who looks and dresses like a man but identifies as a woman, uses a women's bathroom, . .
originally posted by: Domo1
a reply to: Annee
I wasn't really aware of that either. I feel like kids are a different issue. That to me just seems like uptight nonsense.
I'd say if there was ever going to be an issue, it would be some jerk invading the transgenders space out of curiosity, not the other way around.
.
originally posted by: Domo1
. . . giving kids hormones . .
. . . when to accept they are transgender and not being weird kids (I pretended I was a dog a lot when I was little), children should be treated well and not subject to all the nonsense and anger. They're kids.
originally posted by: namelesss
It is typical ignorant bigotry!
A toxic disease that needs to be eradicated!
Low IQ & Conservative Beliefs Linked to Prejudice
news.yahoo.com...
"There's no gentle way to put it: People who give in to racism and prejudice may simply be dumb, according to a new study that is bound to stir public controversy...."
originally posted by: jlafleur02
ESPN has the right to fire him but is it really bigotry, or just the truth? I like the guy but he can be a jerk at times.
originally posted by: StoutBroux
originally posted by: yuppa
a reply to: StoutBroux
read my link. it explains Gender and sex quite well if you read it. and there are soem hell a mannish women out there who are natural so its not always so easy to tell i sit?
Exactly. Which is why I posted what I did. Transgender has nothing to do with how one looks but how one self-identifies. So if say a man who looks and dresses like a man but identifies as a woman, uses a women's bathroom, it should be legal because transgender has nothing to do with appearance. So a masculine man could use a women's bathroom if they identify with being female. Got it? How a transgender looks is not the issue with being transgender. But it may be an issue for others using the same facilities.
Transgender is a less clinical term, referring more to gender identity and gender expression than to sexual orientation or physical sex characteristics. It is also a more general and inclusive term: a transgender person may be gay, transsexual, transvestite, or even genderqueer.
originally posted by: Aazadan
a reply to: jlafleur02
I don't care what a persons says, it's wrong to live in a society where your employer can fire you for what you write on your own social media account.
originally posted by: Aazadan
a reply to: jlafleur02
I don't care what a persons says, it's wrong to live in a society where your employer can fire you for what you write on your own social media account. I find the concept of a public image clause to be wrong. It's wrong to punish this man for being a conservative, it's wrong to punish a teacher for going to a club on the weekend, and it's wrong to punish anyone else for what they write on Facebook.
To me, when you hire a public persona, you're not just hiring a face in front of a camera but you're hiring the brand of that persons name. A persons private life in large part determines that brand, and hiring them means accepting that. Some people will take the good and the bad with that brand and be themselves. Others will try to meticulously sculpt an image. There's nothing wrong with either, but short of choosing to not renew a contract, once a broadcaster has signed the agreement they should be stuck with the person they picked. It's just a matter of equal rights. If ESPN came out in favor of a political decision Shilling disagree's with do you think he would get the option to just break his contract or to not be associated with his employers views?
originally posted by: Annee
No, its not.
If you reflect negatively on the company you work for - - - they have every right to fire you.
No matter what crappy job, you are still a representative of that company.
In Schilling's case - - - he probably signed a contract.
originally posted by: yuppa
Welcome to "right to work states" Where you can be fired for ANYTHING.