It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: IAMTAT
They're talking about SAP (Special Access Programs) level intelligence. These are most closely guarded...and means "people will die" if this material is compromised.
originally posted by: mobiusmale
Hillary Clinton's emails on her unsecured, homebrew server contained intelligence from the U.S. government's most secretive and highly classified programs, according to an unclassified letter from a top inspector general to senior lawmakers.
originally posted by: 3NL1GHT3N3D1
I wish we could go at least one day without hearing about Hilary and her emails. If she was going to get in trouble about it, it would have already happened. This is not "huge", it's just the same story on a different day.
originally posted by: IAMTAT
a reply to: mobiusmale
UH...ohhhhhh...
Beat me to this...but This is huge!
I wonder if they just announced they're going to explore retroactively demoting Petraeus...in order to be 'equal' when they bring the hammer down on Hillary.
According to court documents, former CIA Director David Petraeus was prosecuted for sharing intelligence from special access programs with his biographer and mistress Paula Broadwell. At the heart of his prosecution was a non-disclosure agreement where Petraeus agreed to protect these closely held government programs, with the understanding “unauthorized disclosure, unauthorized retention or negligent handling … could cause irreparable injury to the United States or be used to advantage by a foreign nation.” Clinton signed an identical non-disclosure agreement Jan. 22, 2009.
www.foxnews.com...
originally posted by: schuyler
originally posted by: 3NL1GHT3N3D1
I wish we could go at least one day without hearing about Hilary and her emails. If she was going to get in trouble about it, it would have already happened. This is not "huge", it's just the same story on a different day.
I simply do not understand your attitude here. How could you possibly think this is unimportant? Anyone else would go to jail. If this had been done by Trump or Cruz or Bush you'd be all over it.
originally posted by: TinfoilTP
originally posted by: IAMTAT
a reply to: mobiusmale
UH...ohhhhhh...
Beat me to this...but This is huge!
I wonder if they just announced they're going to explore retroactively demoting Petraeus...in order to be 'equal' when they bring the hammer down on Hillary.
According to court documents, former CIA Director David Petraeus was prosecuted for sharing intelligence from special access programs with his biographer and mistress Paula Broadwell. At the heart of his prosecution was a non-disclosure agreement where Petraeus agreed to protect these closely held government programs, with the understanding “unauthorized disclosure, unauthorized retention or negligent handling … could cause irreparable injury to the United States or be used to advantage by a foreign nation.” Clinton signed an identical non-disclosure agreement Jan. 22, 2009.
www.foxnews.com...
Yup, she is toast now.
Petraeus went down for the same thing.
originally posted by: Willtell
a reply to: mobiusmale
The likelihood of Hillary being indicted for this is nil.
For one, Obama’s justice department won’t do it. That’s one reason Hillary’s kissing Obama’s butt in debates.
Two, the FBI won’t bust Hillary because the elite don’t want it. They’ll hold this over Hillary’s head for years and control her
Three, her husband is too much of an insider.
originally posted by: Xcathdra
There is talk that the Pentagon may demote General Petraus over his incident. It made no sense to me with the exception of Clinton being charged for her issue. They cant argue there was a difference in punishment.