It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Hillary's campaign loves to play the "nothing was ever classified until after the fact" game, while conveniently ignoring the fact that classified information may or may not be marked... just because something is not marked as being classified doesn't make it any less classified.
originally posted by: IAMTAT
I heard a General describe this intelligence, as to the danger of it falling into the wrong hands, like this:
CLASSIFIED = a Bullet
SECRET = a Hand Grenade
TOP SECRET = a Bomb
SAP = a Nuclear Weapon
originally posted by: hotspace
What's the deal?? Why hasn't she been charged? Will she be charged??
I have a very long military background. I can this with 100% certainty, If I breached security protocol, my clearance would have been revoked, and punishment would have been served.
I just don't get it.
While the State Department and Clinton campaign have said the emails in questions were “retroactively classified” or “upgraded” – to justify the more than 1,300 classified emails on her server – those terms are meaningless under federal law.
originally posted by: Phoenix
a reply to: pteridine
"It may be negligence but it's not espionage "
It is however conspiracy which carries more severe penalty the negligence.
The code worded material did not hop over to unsecured server all by themselves.
The difference would be that as a normal government worker, you would be using a department issued email and not some email on some crap you bought from Best Buy.
originally posted by: Phoenix
a reply to: pteridine
Under the applicable laws covering Clintons email insecurity it is a conspiracy for two or more people to be involved in illegal dissemination of classified information.
All classified, and especially code-worded SAP information has to be purposefully transferred from a secure system onto the unsecure system such as what Clinton was using. That's why instructions were given by her to remove headers.
Someone or several someone's with clearance conspired to transfer classified data to Clintons unsecure server, of that there is no doubt.
Your diatribe on election although off-topic is laughable to say the least.
That the IG General and staff had to obtain clearance just to read the Clinton material is an indictment in and of itself when viewed against her claims to not have classified info in her emails nor previously classified info at time of sending/receiving on unsecure network.
The only dragging out going on IMHO is that the email issue has opened a much wider conspiracy for FBI scrutiny involving the Foundation activities and Administration involvement in several other areas.
HillaryForPrison2016