It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Melting steel?

page: 23
16
<< 20  21  22    24  25  26 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 21 2015 @ 02:58 PM
link   
a reply to: skyeagle409




In order for you to debunk that video, you have to provide the time lines where explosions are heard


Nope, don't have to do that..




posted on Dec, 21 2015 @ 03:00 PM
link   
a reply to: wildb



Nope, don't have to do that..


Of course you can't because there are no sounds of explosions in those videos, which explains why you cannot provide video time lines where you have claimed, explosions were heard.



posted on Dec, 21 2015 @ 03:02 PM
link   
a reply to: skyeagle409




Of course you can't because there are no sounds of explosions in those videos,


Yeah so, what does that mean, Oh yeah, nothing, nothing at all...



posted on Dec, 21 2015 @ 03:12 PM
link   

originally posted by: skyeagle409
a reply to: wildb

In order for you to debunk that video, you have to provide the time lines where explosions are heard and failing that, you have no case. Now, go ahead, debunk that video with the time lines that depict the sound of explosions as WTC 1 collapses. Failure to do so will prove my case that you have no case for explosives.

WTC Pre-Collapse Bowing Debunks 9/11 "Controlled Demolition" Theory
.





Federal engineering investigators studying the destruction of the World Trade Center's twin towers on Sept. 11 said


Well thats disinfo right there....



posted on Dec, 21 2015 @ 04:26 PM
link   
a reply to: wildb




Yeah so, what does that mean, Oh yeah, nothing, nothing at all...

This is not a school yard.
Answers like that make you look bad.
If you can post any videos of silent explosives your point will have merit.
But right now there is nothing to bolster your claim for explosives.




Well thats disinfo right there....

So if you can't prove your point he's a mythical disinfo agent?
Seriously?



posted on Dec, 21 2015 @ 04:42 PM
link   
a reply to: samkent




This is not a school yard. Answers like that make you look bad. If you can post any videos of silent explosives your point will have merit. But right now there is nothing to bolster your claim for explosives.


I don't think so, he post video with bad audio and claims thats proof. Then asks for video with explosions in it and when we give it to him he reply's with it's debunked, thats school yard.. The evidence is in the video not the audio.





So if you can't prove your point he's a mythical disinfo agent?


You don't read post very well or you would know sky did not say that. Furthermore I was stating a fact, the collapse of the towers were never investigated..



posted on Dec, 21 2015 @ 04:45 PM
link   
a reply to: wildb




The evidence is in the video not the audio.

Show us one video where the building is explosively demoed and the sound only has birds and crickets.
Just one video.



posted on Dec, 21 2015 @ 04:47 PM
link   

originally posted by: samkent
a reply to: wildb




The evidence is in the video not the audio.

Show us one video where the building is explosively demoed and the sound only has birds and crickets.
Just one video.



Now thats school yard..



posted on Dec, 21 2015 @ 06:04 PM
link   
a reply to: wildb

Facts that have nothing to do with disinformation. Simple laws of physics, you understand.



posted on Dec, 21 2015 @ 06:05 PM
link   
a reply to: wildb

In other words, you cannot provide evidence of explosions in any WTC video.



posted on Dec, 21 2015 @ 06:07 PM
link   
a reply to: wildb



I don't think so, he post video with bad audio and claims thats proof. Then asks for video with explosions in it and when we give it to him he reply's with it's debunked, thats school yard..


That is false. You have yet to post a single WTC video time line where demolition explosions are heard. I have asked you for those time lines and you keep stalling.



posted on Dec, 21 2015 @ 06:08 PM
link   
a reply to: wildb



Oh yeah, nothing, nothing at all...


That's right!! Nothing in any WTC video that depicts the sound of demolition explosions.



posted on Dec, 21 2015 @ 06:10 PM
link   
a reply to: wildb



Well thats disinfo right there....


Prove it with evidence, otherwise, you have case.



posted on Dec, 21 2015 @ 06:11 PM
link   

originally posted by: skyeagle409
a reply to: wildb

Facts that have nothing to do with disinformation. Simple laws of physics, you understand.



Yes I understand, simple laws of physics tell us the buildings did not collapse due to gravity alone...



posted on Dec, 21 2015 @ 06:15 PM
link   
a reply to: wildb



Yes I understand, simple laws of physics tell us the buildings did not collapse due to gravity alone...


Apparently, you do not understand the laws of physics. Now, let's take a look at a 21-story steel frame building that collapsed without the aid of explosives.

Photo: 21-Story Steel Frame Building Collapsed: No Explosives Involved

As you can plainly see, gravity had brought down that 21-story steel frame building.
edit on 21-12-2015 by skyeagle409 because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 21 2015 @ 06:19 PM
link   

originally posted by: skyeagle409
a reply to: wildb



Yes I understand, simple laws of physics tell us the buildings did not collapse due to gravity alone...


Apparently, you do not understand the laws of physics. Now, let's take a look at a 21-story steel frame building that collapsed without the aid of explosives.

Photo: 21-Story Steel Frame Building Collapsed: No Explosives Involved

As you can plainly see, gravity had brought down that 21-story steel frame building.



This is as significant to the twin towers as a bowl of cherrys..



posted on Dec, 21 2015 @ 06:21 PM
link   
a reply to: skyeagle409




Apparently, you do not understand the laws of physics



Sure I do, thats how I know the OS is not true...



posted on Dec, 21 2015 @ 06:25 PM
link   

originally posted by: skyeagle409
a reply to: wildb

In other words, you cannot provide evidence of explosions in any WTC video.


If you tell a lie over and over you will soon believe it to be the truth...



posted on Dec, 21 2015 @ 06:27 PM
link   
a reply to: wildb

In other words, you cannot provide a single shred of evidence that explosives were used to demolish the WTC buildings.



Civil & Structural Engineers on WTC Collapse

Even if all of the columns and girders had survived the impact - an unlikely event - the structure would fail as the result of a buckling of the columns. The heat from an ordinary office fire would suffice to soften and weaken the unprotected steel. Evaluation of the effects of the fire on the core column structure, with the insulation removed by the impact, showed that collapse would follow whatever the number of columns cut at the time of the impact."

911-engineers.blogspot.com...



posted on Dec, 21 2015 @ 06:29 PM
link   
a reply to: wildb

That won't fly. Facts, evidence, and the laws of physics have backed me up.



The Collapse of Twin Towers: Causes and Effects

web.mit.edu...

edit on 21-12-2015 by skyeagle409 because: (no reason given)



new topics




 
16
<< 20  21  22    24  25  26 >>

log in

join