It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Your going to tell me debri flew over WTC 6 and the street with only the force of gravity?!?!?! do ya realize how absurd that sounds? Can't wait for a response..... looking at you sky.
originally posted by: skyeagle409
a reply to: wildb
I have to disagree because in the final seconds of the collapse, WTC 7 is seen tilting toward the south, and the south wall is where that huge impact hole was located.
originally posted by: skyeagle409
a reply to: wildb
The firefighters at the scene who saw that huge hole on the south wall of WTC 7 disagree, so once again, you have no case for explosives.
Hayden: No, not right away, and that’s probably why it stood for so long because it took a while for that fire to develop. It was a heavy body of fire in there and then we didn’t make any attempt to fight it.
WTC 7 Fires
Release date: September 23, 2007
Regarding WTC 7: The long-awaited US Government NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology) report on the collapse of WTC 7 is due to be published at the end of this year (although it has been delayed already a few times [ adding fuel to the conspiracy theorists fires!]). That report should explain the cause and mechanics of the collapse in great detail. Early on the afternoon of September 11th 2001, following the collapse of WTC 1 & 2, I feared a collapse of WTC 7 (as did many on my staff).
The reasons are as follows:
1 - Although prior to that day high-rise structures had never collapsed, The collapse of WTC 1 & 2 showed that certain high-rise structures subjected to damage from impact and from fire will collapse.
2. The collapse of WTC 1 damaged portions of the lower floors of WTC 7.
3. WTC 7, we knew, was built on a small number of large columns providing an open Atrium on the lower levels.
4. numerous fires on many floors of WTC 7 burned without sufficient water supply to attack them.
For these reasons I made the decision (without consulting the owner, the mayor or anyone else - as ranking fire officer, that decision was my responsibility) to clear a collapse zone surrounding the building and to stop all activity within that zone. Approximately three hours after that order was given, WTC 7 collapsed.
Conspiracy theories abound and I believe firmly that all of them are without merit.
Regards, Dan Nigro
Chief of Department FDNY (retired)
"We had Maydays like crazy.... The heat must have been tremendous. There was so much [expletive] fire there. This whole pile was burning like crazy. Just the heat and the smoke from all the other buildings on fire, you [couldn't] see anything. So it took us a while and we ended up backing everybody out, and [that's] when 7 collapsed.... Basically, we fell back for 7 to collapse, and then we waited a while and it got a lot more organized, I would guess." - Lieutenant William Ryan
"The most important operational decision to be made that afternoon was the collapse (Of the WTC towers) had damaged 7 World Trade Center, which is about a 50 story building, at Vesey between West Broadway and Washington Street. It had very heavy fire on many floors and I ordered the evacuation of an area sufficient around to protect our members, so we had to give up some rescue operations that were going on at the time and back the people away far enough so that if 7 World Trade did collapse, we [wouldn't] lose any more people. We continued to operate on what we could from that distance and approximately an hour and a half after that order was [given], at 5:30 in the afternoon, World Trade Center collapsed completely" - Daniel Nigro, Chief of Department
The video mentions damage to WTC7 from the towers collapse. How did gravity propel massive sections of steel horizontally over a massive building and across the street?
originally posted by: wildb
originally posted by: skyeagle409
a reply to: wildb
The firefighters at the scene who saw that huge hole on the south wall of WTC 7 disagree, so once again, you have no case for explosives.
Sure I do, its all there in the video, the audio and the dozen or more FDNY who witnessed the explosions. Science is the proof, which is more likely from what was observed, the answer is clear..
Your going to tell me debri flew over WTC 6 and the street with only the force of gravity?!?!?! do ya realize how absurd that sounds? Can't wait for a response..... looking at you sky.
Has anyone ever thought that it might not have been the jet fuel that over heated the iron or steel beams?
But maybe it residue hydraulic fluids and other oils plus the on board oxygen tanks might have super heated the fire after the initial blast from the jet fuel that cause the beams to weaken?
Hell even the plane was made out of aluminum and even magnesium which could have ignited and burned at high temperatures as well?
Would this solve both of you guys arguments?
There had to be some kind of force moving the debris away instead of falling straight down.
So a pool ball analogy that doesn't apply. Pool balls specifically designed to ricochet while rolling on a table has as much to do with the destruction of 3 buildings as what I ate for breakfast did.