It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Melting steel?

page: 24
16
<< 21  22  23    25  26  27 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 21 2015 @ 06:37 PM
link   
a reply to: skyeagle409




That won't fly. Facts, evidence, and the laws of physics have backed me up.


Facts evidence and the laws of physics point to controlled demo..




posted on Dec, 21 2015 @ 06:39 PM
link   
a reply to: wildb



Facts evidence and the laws of physics point to controlled demo..


Considering that you cannot provide a single WTC video time line where demolition explosions are heard, you have no case.



posted on Dec, 21 2015 @ 06:42 PM
link   
a reply to: skyeagle409




Considering that you cannot provide a single WTC video time line where demolition explosions are heard, you have no case.


I have done that several times now, and you know that, who is it you are trying to fool...



posted on Dec, 21 2015 @ 06:47 PM
link   
a reply to: wildb



I have done that several times now, and you know that, who is it you are trying to fool...


As proof that you posted no such thing, provide us with a reference right now where you claim that you have provided the WTC video time lines and failure to do so will prove my point that you are not telling the truth.

I am waiting for those WTC video time lines.


edit on 21-12-2015 by skyeagle409 because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 21 2015 @ 06:50 PM
link   
a reply to: wildb

Apparently, the laws of physics do not agree with you.



A NATION CHALLENGED: THE TRADE CENTER; TOWERS' COLLAPSE RAISES NEW DOUBTS ABOUT FIRE TESTS

The fiery collapse of three World Trade Center skyscrapers has led scientists, engineers and building officials to question the century-old practice of relying on tests done in hulking, low-tech furnaces to determine if building materials will survive out-of-control blazes.

911-engineers.blogspot.com...



posted on Dec, 21 2015 @ 06:59 PM
link   
a reply to: wildb




Facts evidence and the laws of physics point to controlled demo..



Don't ever let any bird brain tell you you have no case.
The glass in every building used to example the dessiples
involved with the demolition of buildings where explosives
are used has been removed. Of course the insulated double
glass units in the towers would muffle the sound of explosions
way up high. Someone is a non stop smoke stack of pollution.



posted on Dec, 21 2015 @ 07:00 PM
link   

originally posted by: skyeagle409
a reply to: wildb



I have done that several times now, and you know that, who is it you are trying to fool...


As proof that you posted no such thing, provide us with a reference right now where you claim that you have provided the WTC video time lines and failure to do so will prove my point that you are not telling the truth.

I am waiting for those WTC video time lines.




Page 10, you should be the last one talking about lying, you have lied many times

originally posted by: skyeagle409
a reply to: wildb

That won't fly. You have no case for explosives which is why you are unable to post the time lines that I have requested from those videos.



At 7:30 in my last video, now stop asking...

edit on 21-12-2015 by wildb because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 21 2015 @ 07:02 PM
link   
a reply to: randyvs



Don't ever let any bird brain tell you you have no case.


Amusing coming from someone who got caught posting debunked and hoaxed videos.



posted on Dec, 21 2015 @ 07:02 PM
link   

originally posted by: randyvs
a reply to: wildb




Facts evidence and the laws of physics point to controlled demo..



Don't ever let any bird brain tell you you have no case.
The glass in every building used to example the dessiples
involved with the demolition of buildings where explosives
are used has been removed. Of course the insulated double
glass units in the towers would muffle the sound of explosions
way up high. Someone is a non stop smoke stack of pollution.



Priceless !!



posted on Dec, 21 2015 @ 07:05 PM
link   

originally posted by: skyeagle409
a reply to: randyvs



Don't ever let any bird brain tell you you have no case.


Amusing coming from someone who got caught posting debunked and hoaxed videos.



I could post a photo of the moon and you would tell me its been debunked...lol



posted on Dec, 21 2015 @ 07:10 PM
link   
a reply to: wildb



Page 10, please don't feel bad.


On page 10, you posted a debunked video!! I asked you for the WTC video time lines.

You're stalling, so let's try it once again, provide the video time lines where demolition explosions are heard and if you failed this time, I am going to take advantage of your inability to post the WTC video time lines requested from you.

Now, in the following video, point out the time lines where demolition explosions are heard as WTC 1 collapses.




posted on Dec, 21 2015 @ 07:11 PM
link   
a reply to: wildb

Still waiting for you to post those WTC video time lines. Why are you stalling?



posted on Dec, 21 2015 @ 07:14 PM
link   

originally posted by: skyeagle409
a reply to: wildb



Page 10, please don't feel bad.


On page 10, you posted a debunked video!! I asked you for the WTC video time lines.

You're stalling, so let's try it once again, provide the video time lines where demolition explosions are heard and if you failed this time, I am going to take advantage of your inability to post the WTC video time lines requested from you.

Now, in the following video, point out the time lines where demolition explosions are heard as WTC 1 collapses.





www.abovetopsecret.com...



posted on Dec, 21 2015 @ 07:16 PM
link   
a reply to: wildb

You forgot about the WTC video time lines. Either post them or throw in the towel and admit that you have no such times lines to post.



posted on Dec, 21 2015 @ 07:16 PM
link   
a reply to: skyeagle409

It's not amuzing, it's truly sad that you have these incessant delusions
of busting people on ATS. And that you've made a life out of it.
Besides being wrong about every bit of it. And trying to pass it off as if you
know something.
edit on Rpm122115v19201500000015 by randyvs because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 21 2015 @ 07:18 PM
link   
a reply to: randyvs

Considering that you have yet to post evidence of explosives and thermite, you have no case.



posted on Dec, 21 2015 @ 07:20 PM
link   
a reply to: skyeagle409

Consider squawt! Tell the truth!



posted on Dec, 21 2015 @ 07:21 PM
link   
a reply to: skyeagle409

Still wondering why you keep posting a video that obviously points to propellant being used. Your video shows arching debris trails and a debris field that expands way beyond what gravity would do. In a vacuum things fall at the same rate but in the real world steel drops like a bag of bricks. I wonder where the old "bag of bricks" saying came from. Because they are heavy??? Steel could not make it it to WTC7 without explosives. Your just being obtuse at this point.
edit on 21-12-2015 by DeceptioVisus because: grammar



posted on Dec, 21 2015 @ 07:21 PM
link   

originally posted by: skyeagle409
a reply to: wildb

You forgot about the WTC video time lines. Either post them or throw in the towel and admit that you have no such times lines to post.



Perhaps you should see your doctor, he can help with your memory problem. The evidence is in the video, that of which you cannot dispute..



posted on Dec, 21 2015 @ 07:25 PM
link   
a reply to: wildb

In other words, you are unable to post the WTC 1 video time lines as requested, so you have no case for explosives in regard to WTC 1.

Now, let's try WTC 2, and point out the video time lines where you claim, demolition explosions are heard.





top topics



 
16
<< 21  22  23    25  26  27 >>

log in

join