It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: jtma508
I think that a government that routinely bombs civilians, weddings, hospitals, and such has a great deal of gall to lecture the citizenry on 'gun control'. Not only are they killing hundreds of innocents with their actions, they're destroying tens-of-millions of dollars of non-military infrastructure including people's homes and businesses. Maybe they need to clean-up their own frigging act before they climb up on the soapbox.
originally posted by: misskat1
Apparently the city officials are welcoming his visit, www.facebook.com...
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: misskat1
Apparently the city officials are welcoming his visit, www.facebook.com...
Yes, read the original post and the following comments. Not only do some people have a problem with proper grammar, many are also nutters.
There are better ways to protest Obama and using your dead to do it is sad.
originally posted by: DBCowboy
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: misskat1
Apparently the city officials are welcoming his visit, www.facebook.com...
Yes, read the original post and the following comments. Not only do some people have a problem with proper grammar, many are also nutters.
There are better ways to protest Obama and using your dead to do it is sad.
Using someone else's dead to promote an agenda is even worse.
Lot of rhetoric and talking points there.
Of course not, because you can't even comprehend that I was talking about their response, not the deaths. Why is it so hard for people to follow a written conversation anymore? I still find the appeal to emotions fallacy quite annoying.
I was talking about your little emotional post. Reading comprehension is fundamental. Please keep up, man. Jesus.
You're right. And I have a right to criticize them for politicizing the death of these people by trying to make a political statement against the President.
If you criticize one for making it political, you should criticize the other. Both are equally uncalled for.
originally posted by: DBCowboy
originally posted by: ManBehindTheMask
originally posted by: DBCowboy
I'll wait for him to be selfless, consoling, kind, and respectful before I call him a weak, cheap, pandering dirtbag.
And ill rely on his past history
Oh I have no doubt that he'll say the words, "I" and "Me" more times than the Secret Service has guns. But I can't call him a pathetic waste of a good suit until he does start spewing garbage from his pie hole.
originally posted by: seagull
Those folks are hurting. They're angry at the Universe in general, and they've reason.
The President should honor their wishes and stay away. They do not want him there.
In what way is he being any different then the Westboro Baptist church asswipes? Intruding where he's not wanted.
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: misskat1
Apparently the city officials are welcoming his visit, www.facebook.com...
Yes, read the original post and the following comments. Not only do some people have a problem with proper grammar, many are also nutters.
There are better ways to protest Obama and using your dead to do it is sad.
originally posted by: ManBehindTheMask
originally posted by: DBCowboy
originally posted by: ManBehindTheMask
originally posted by: DBCowboy
I'll wait for him to be selfless, consoling, kind, and respectful before I call him a weak, cheap, pandering dirtbag.
And ill rely on his past history
Oh I have no doubt that he'll say the words, "I" and "Me" more times than the Secret Service has guns. But I can't call him a pathetic waste of a good suit until he does start spewing garbage from his pie hole.
He already did, his first statement about this whole thing was that "IT SHOULD BE POLITICIZED" i mean he told his agenda right there
"the annointed one" thats what your upset about? As to the rest, Obama stated point BLANK that it SHOULD be politicized in his speech..... So they are obviously not wrong on that, he stated his intent, and they have every right to tell him to take a hike, that doesnt make them nutters
that makes them angry at the President standing on the bodies of their loved ones to push his agenda....
Mmmm yes yes, I find your assessment , distasteful and not amusing so I MUST just be stupid, and unable to comprehend what you are saying
Nice personal attack, well done and on par with your normal Modus Oparandi
My enrollment post huh? Thats cute speaking of emotional responses, I find your repeated personal attacks very emotional......
Pot Meet Kettle
Speaking out against the presidents STATED agenda, is not political, ita direct affront to the people of the area and they wont stand for it....
Im sorry you cant see the difference between politics, and people who are just FED UP
originally posted by: introvert
They claim Obama is polarizing but they are being polarizing.
They claim Obama is politicizing this but they are politicizing this.
They are dishonoring the dead as much as Obama. How sad.
originally posted by: introvert
It's all about politics. Nothing else. And they are stepping on their own dead to make a political point.
originally posted by: burdman30ott6
originally posted by: introvert
It's all about politics. Nothing else. And they are stepping on their own dead to make a political point.
They can't. The Free Speech Zone barrier extends far enough out from Obama while he's standing on that pile of dead that none of these poor souls can even approach it.
What makes them nutters is the way they talk. That was my point on that aspect.
How sad that the are standing on the bodies of their loved ones to protest the president. Is one better than the other? I think not. Either way, the dead are being used for an agenda.
You weren't even addressing what I was talking about. What am I supposed to do when you're not even comprehending what I said. Also, quit with the personal attack crap. Just because I call you ou on your lack of comprehension does not mean I attacking you personally. I pointing out that a conversation can not be had if you cannot read properly.
Exhibit A. What the hell is "enrollment"?
This has to be the dumbest thing you've ever said. It's all about politics. Nothing else. And they are stepping on their own dead to make a political point.
again your MO shows, so you attack their spelling among other things as a source to try and discredit their feelings? And then call them nutters
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: ManBehindTheMask
Grammar is very important. It tells us a lot about a person and their ability to think and comprehend. If they can't get the basics, how can we expect them to understand the complex?