It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Most homosexuality is a choice

page: 55
76
<< 52  53  54    56  57  58 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 5 2015 @ 10:22 PM
link   

originally posted by: Deaf Alien
a reply to: pompel9



But please do attack me personally

Where have I ever attacked you personally?


Here:


originally posted by: Deaf Alien
a reply to: pompel9



The author is gay, so obviously he has an agenda with this book.

Obviously?

Gay people can't research homosexuality in nature without having an "agenda"?

Keep showing us your true colors.




posted on Oct, 5 2015 @ 10:23 PM
link   
a reply to: pompel9

Again, that is confusing a Sex Act with Sexual-Orientation. lets say i needed to have sex with a Woman for reproduction purposes, that wouldn't make me Bisexual, that would mean i had Sex with a Woman.

If i wanted to Have Sex with Woman than i would be Bisexual



posted on Oct, 5 2015 @ 10:24 PM
link   
a reply to: pompel9



You are the one claiming that it does happen.

Eh? And I have shown that it does happen.



So how do you come to the conclusion that I have the burden of proof?

Because you are the one who claimed that there are no homosexual animals.



posted on Oct, 5 2015 @ 10:26 PM
link   

originally posted by: Deaf Alien
a reply to: pompel9



I could never love or have sex with another man. No matter how hard I tried. You could have threatened to kill me, and I still couldn't have done it.

That answers the OP's post. Yes homosexuality is not a choice.

The sex act itself is a choice. People have been threatened many times in the past and still do today. But who to say that they wouldn't choose to comply or "do the motion" (which you said is impossible).


I probably could do the act. But my d*** would not have been hard. So not much could have come out of it.



posted on Oct, 5 2015 @ 10:26 PM
link   
a reply to: pompel9

You mean showing your true colors? That is not attacking you personally.

You stated that since this particular author is gay (by implication ANY gay authors) researching homosexuality has an agenda behind it.

Your true colors shows that you have that belief.


edit on 10/5/2015 by Deaf Alien because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 5 2015 @ 10:27 PM
link   

originally posted by: Darth_Prime
a reply to: pompel9

Again, that is confusing a Sex Act with Sexual-Orientation. lets say i needed to have sex with a Woman for reproduction purposes, that wouldn't make me Bisexual, that would mean i had Sex with a Woman.

If i wanted to Have Sex with Woman than i would be Bisexual


That would mean you are attracted to women as well as men. And that makes you bisexual.



posted on Oct, 5 2015 @ 10:28 PM
link   
a reply to: pompel9



But my d*** would not have been hard.


How about threesome?



posted on Oct, 5 2015 @ 10:28 PM
link   
a reply to: Lucid Lunacy

I am saying it is not normal..

your hell bent on saying it is...

I perceive no hostility..

No matter how you make it sound, it is still not normal...

It is excepted and as I have said over and over again it is not that important...

I am if anything making a stance on my opinion...

I respect homosexuality I have no problem with it... Is that hard to understand? Yet to try and advocate it is normal is premature.. It just is, I hate to break it to you guys but I am on the east coast and fixing to goto bed.

Do I think homosexuality is a choice? Yes most of the time.. Yet the element of chance is 5 percent so perhaps their is something else involved I dunno don't really care either. Yet I truly believe it is a choice.. I do not have time nor do I have the diploma to make a study on the topic...



posted on Oct, 5 2015 @ 10:31 PM
link   

originally posted by: Deaf Alien
a reply to: pompel9



You are the one claiming that it does happen.

Eh? And I have shown that it does happen.



So how do you come to the conclusion that I have the burden of proof?

Because you are the one who claimed that there are no homosexual animals.


Where?

Yes, because there are no proof of this, at least not posted in this topic. I actually tried to google for scientific papers on this, looked trough about 5 pages on google. But I could not find any scientific papers on the subject. Only one I found that handled this was Christian pseudo paper. Not worth anything.



posted on Oct, 5 2015 @ 10:34 PM
link   

originally posted by: Deaf Alien
a reply to: pompel9

You mean showing your true colors? That is not attacking you personally.

You stated that since this particular author is gay (by implication ANY gay authors) researching homosexuality has an agenda behind it.

Your true colors shows that you have that belief.



I see that you didn't quoted me. If you had, then all would have seen my reasoning. That person is not a scientist. He is a biologist that is trying to make some money.
Why didn't he make a scientific paper on this, if he had the proof?

And yes, that is going after the person.

And I didn't say any gay authors. I said this one.
edit on 5-10-2015 by pompel9 because: Adding a sentence

edit on 5-10-2015 by pompel9 because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 5 2015 @ 10:36 PM
link   

originally posted by: Deaf Alien
a reply to: pompel9



But my d*** would not have been hard.


How about threesome?


If there is man in the room, then I can't get it up. How many times do I have to say this?



posted on Oct, 5 2015 @ 10:37 PM
link   
a reply to: pompel9



Only one I found that handled this was Christian pseudo paper.

roflmbo is that for real? Oh it's probably related to sin. Yeah I don't take much stock in any Christian "research".

But anyway so you still stand that homosexual behaviors in animals is dominance even given proofs to the contrary for some examples.



posted on Oct, 5 2015 @ 10:39 PM
link   
a reply to: pompel9



If there is man in the room, then I can't get it up. How many times do I have to say this?

NO NO NO NO NO!!!! See? You are not paying attention.

We are talking about homosexual men having sex with women.

Having a man in a room will certainly get him up.

You said it's impossible for a homosexual man to impregnate a woman.



posted on Oct, 5 2015 @ 10:42 PM
link   
a reply to: pompel9



I see that you didn't quoted me.




The author is gay, so obviously he has an agenda with this book.

Happy now?



posted on Oct, 5 2015 @ 10:42 PM
link   
a reply to: Bicent76

I'm hell-bent on saying it's normal? Okay. Sure. I guess. I literally just showed it's normal using an official definition of the word.

You keep repeating it's not normal. We understand that's your position. I'm merely asking for elaboration because much of it is very unclear.

Anyways. This is tedious so I'm officially no longer interested.
edit on 5-10-2015 by Lucid Lunacy because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 5 2015 @ 10:44 PM
link   

originally posted by: Deaf Alien
a reply to: pompel9



Only one I found that handled this was Christian pseudo paper.

roflmbo is that for real? Oh it's probably related to sin. Yeah I don't take much stock in any Christian "research".

But anyway so you still stand that homosexual behaviors in animals is dominance even given proofs to the contrary for some examples.


Yes, sadly it is. But that is to expected when it comes to Christians.

Actually no sin talk. Just plain refusal, without any scientific data. Just browsed a bit of it, not worth reading.



posted on Oct, 5 2015 @ 10:47 PM
link   

originally posted by: Deaf Alien
a reply to: pompel9



If there is man in the room, then I can't get it up. How many times do I have to say this?

NO NO NO NO NO!!!! See? You are not paying attention.

We are talking about homosexual men having sex with women.

Having a man in a room will certainly get him up.

You said it's impossible for a homosexual man to impregnate a woman.


Actually you asked me. And I am straight man. I can't answer for gay men. But I am certain that a woman in the room will for the gay man be huge turn off.
And if they are not, then I consider them bisexuals.



posted on Oct, 5 2015 @ 10:49 PM
link   
a reply to: pompel9

That person is not a scientist. He is a biologist that is trying to make some money.

Biology is a scientific field. Biologists are scientists. Why exactly are you assuming all this sinister stuff about him?? Where is that coming from?..


Why didn't he make a scientific paper on this, if he had the proof?

The book cites numerous studies. You'd know that if you read it. Of course you're not going to know that because you said you won't read it.
edit on 5-10-2015 by Lucid Lunacy because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 5 2015 @ 10:50 PM
link   

originally posted by: Deaf Alien
a reply to: pompel9



I see that you didn't quoted me.




The author is gay, so obviously he has an agenda with this book.

Happy now?


How about quoting the actual post you responded to:


originally posted by: Deaf Alien
a reply to: pompel9



The author is gay, so obviously he has an agenda with this book.

Obviously?

Gay people can't research homosexuality in nature without having an "agenda"?

Keep showing us your true colors.


Yes they can.

But this person did not make a scientific study. He made a book. That should tell you something. And he made a point about that he is gay had nothing to do with making this book. Those are red flags for me, and I do not take them seriously. It would have been the same if it was a straight man that had made such a book just in reverse. I would not have taken him seriously either.

But please do attack me personally, instead of what I post.



posted on Oct, 5 2015 @ 10:52 PM
link   
a reply to: pompel9



Actually you asked me. And I am straight man.

This is within the context of homosexuality being a choice.

Your claim is - homosexual people can not reproduce. If they can "get it up" for women then that must mean they are bisexuals. This is your claim.

We have provided a several counterclaims.



new topics

top topics



 
76
<< 52  53  54    56  57  58 >>

log in

join