It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Deaf Alien
a reply to: pompel9
But please do attack me personally
Where have I ever attacked you personally?
originally posted by: Deaf Alien
a reply to: pompel9
The author is gay, so obviously he has an agenda with this book.
Obviously?
Gay people can't research homosexuality in nature without having an "agenda"?
Keep showing us your true colors.
originally posted by: Deaf Alien
a reply to: pompel9
I could never love or have sex with another man. No matter how hard I tried. You could have threatened to kill me, and I still couldn't have done it.
That answers the OP's post. Yes homosexuality is not a choice.
The sex act itself is a choice. People have been threatened many times in the past and still do today. But who to say that they wouldn't choose to comply or "do the motion" (which you said is impossible).
originally posted by: Darth_Prime
a reply to: pompel9
Again, that is confusing a Sex Act with Sexual-Orientation. lets say i needed to have sex with a Woman for reproduction purposes, that wouldn't make me Bisexual, that would mean i had Sex with a Woman.
If i wanted to Have Sex with Woman than i would be Bisexual
originally posted by: Deaf Alien
a reply to: pompel9
You are the one claiming that it does happen.
Eh? And I have shown that it does happen.
So how do you come to the conclusion that I have the burden of proof?
Because you are the one who claimed that there are no homosexual animals.
originally posted by: Deaf Alien
a reply to: pompel9
You mean showing your true colors? That is not attacking you personally.
You stated that since this particular author is gay (by implication ANY gay authors) researching homosexuality has an agenda behind it.
Your true colors shows that you have that belief.
originally posted by: Deaf Alien
a reply to: pompel9
But my d*** would not have been hard.
How about threesome?
Only one I found that handled this was Christian pseudo paper.
If there is man in the room, then I can't get it up. How many times do I have to say this?
originally posted by: Deaf Alien
a reply to: pompel9
Only one I found that handled this was Christian pseudo paper.
roflmbo is that for real? Oh it's probably related to sin. Yeah I don't take much stock in any Christian "research".
But anyway so you still stand that homosexual behaviors in animals is dominance even given proofs to the contrary for some examples.
originally posted by: Deaf Alien
a reply to: pompel9
If there is man in the room, then I can't get it up. How many times do I have to say this?
NO NO NO NO NO!!!! See? You are not paying attention.
We are talking about homosexual men having sex with women.
Having a man in a room will certainly get him up.
You said it's impossible for a homosexual man to impregnate a woman.
That person is not a scientist. He is a biologist that is trying to make some money.
Why didn't he make a scientific paper on this, if he had the proof?
originally posted by: Deaf Alien
a reply to: pompel9
I see that you didn't quoted me.
The author is gay, so obviously he has an agenda with this book.
Happy now?
originally posted by: Deaf Alien
a reply to: pompel9
The author is gay, so obviously he has an agenda with this book.
Obviously?
Gay people can't research homosexuality in nature without having an "agenda"?
Keep showing us your true colors.
Actually you asked me. And I am straight man.