It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Carrying an ID is generally required if you’re driving a vehicle or a passenger on a commercial airline. These requirements have been upheld on the slippery premise that individuals who prefer not to carry ID can choose not to drive or fly.
From here, ID laws only get more complicated. In Hiibel v. Sixth Judicial District Court of Nevada, the Supreme Court upheld state laws requiring citizens to reveal their identity when officers have reasonable suspicion to believe criminal activity may be taking place. Commonly known as “stop-and-identify” statutes, these laws permit police to arrest criminal suspects who refuse to identify themselves.
originally posted by: boymonkey74
a reply to: neo96
So you would want compulsory ID's and the police able to stop anyone legal or not to demand those papers?.
originally posted by: boymonkey74
a reply to: seeker1963
We didn't want compulsory ID cards and so we don't have them despite our government wanting us to have them.
I'm just pointing out the hypocrisy from some members here who bleat freedom but only when it suits them.
Wouldn't ID cards and police asking for them break the right to move freely thing in the constitution?.
originally posted by: boymonkey74
a reply to: neo96
What If one does not drive?.
Can you answer my question or not? Do you want compusory ID cards and the police able to stop and ask for these when ever?.
originally posted by: neo96
originally posted by: boymonkey74
a reply to: neo96
What If one does not drive?.
Can you answer my question or not? Do you want compusory ID cards and the police able to stop and ask for these when ever?.
Doesn't matter if one drives or not, I have seen cops ask passengers for ID, and people walking on the streets.