Luke, I am your father CHANGED, to NO, I am your father......

If there was no ice cap shown even back in 1935, then how did the icecaps supposedly melt?

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: hidingthistime

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: hidingthistime

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: hidingthistime

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: hidingthistime

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: hidingthistime

People have known about (and written about) the so-called "lion and the lamb" discrepancy for some time.

Typically, when someone is thinking of the “lion and the lamb,” Isaiah 11:6 is in mind due to it often being misquoted, “And the wolf will dwell with the lamb, and the leopard will lie down with the young goat, and the calf and the young lion and the fatling together.”

The true “Lion and the Lamb” passage is Revelation 5:5–6. The Lion and the Lamb both refer to Jesus Christ. He is both the conquering Lion of the tribe of Judah and the Lamb who was slain. The Lion and the Lamb are descriptions of two aspects of the nature of Christ. As the Lion of Judah, He fulfills the prophecy of Genesis 49:9 and is the Messiah who would come from the tribe of Judah. As the Lamb of God, He is the perfect and ultimate sacrifice for sin.

Link

Look what y'all have made me do ... quoting the Bible. Jeez.

yes, good find, but it also said that at isaiah 11:6, and the jehovahs witnesses used to use them as paralelles to the harmony they saw between the old and new testament.

Just google isaiah 11:6 and you will see a large majority of the images are a lion and lamb with the quote, now why would that be?

Jehovahs witnesses a well know for editing bibles to suit their own needs.

A regular KJV is different to a Jehovah's Witness KJV.

show me evidence of it saying lion in isaiah 11:6 in one single translation EVER then!

show me IN the bible, not some long cover up damagae control bs article made to sooth the sheep either.

So you only want the evidence you want?

Confirmation bias much?

oh, taste of your own medicine? Answer a question with a question, again afraid to accept the challenge and change the subject because part of you is sooooooo terrified you may be wrong? Show me in a bible if you are so sure.

I can't because it doesn't exist. It's a misunderstanding that's been pointed out to you numerous times. Just because you deny it's true, doesn't it make false.

YOU said with quite the tone of determination that you believed this was the fault of the JWs changing their bibles.... more back peddling

How is that back peddling? JWs change their bibles. It's VERY well known. I can't show you in a bible because it doesn't exist in main stream bibles.

Next time, try this. Think before you type.

if you are so sure then go get a hard copy and take a picture with your phone! Not that hard. We both know very well I am not denying there are different bible translations and I agree 100% about the JWs being a fraud, but I can guaranee you isaiah 11:6 was not changed in thier bible as you were insinuating.

originally posted by: hidingthistime
If there was no ice cap shown even back in 1935, then how did the icecaps supposedly melt?

1935? I didn't know Google Earth predates the Internet.

originally posted by: hidingthistime

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: hidingthistime

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: hidingthistime

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: hidingthistime

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: hidingthistime

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: hidingthistime

People have known about (and written about) the so-called "lion and the lamb" discrepancy for some time.

Typically, when someone is thinking of the “lion and the lamb,” Isaiah 11:6 is in mind due to it often being misquoted, “And the wolf will dwell with the lamb, and the leopard will lie down with the young goat, and the calf and the young lion and the fatling together.”

The true “Lion and the Lamb” passage is Revelation 5:5–6. The Lion and the Lamb both refer to Jesus Christ. He is both the conquering Lion of the tribe of Judah and the Lamb who was slain. The Lion and the Lamb are descriptions of two aspects of the nature of Christ. As the Lion of Judah, He fulfills the prophecy of Genesis 49:9 and is the Messiah who would come from the tribe of Judah. As the Lamb of God, He is the perfect and ultimate sacrifice for sin.

Link

Look what y'all have made me do ... quoting the Bible. Jeez.

yes, good find, but it also said that at isaiah 11:6, and the jehovahs witnesses used to use them as paralelles to the harmony they saw between the old and new testament.

Just google isaiah 11:6 and you will see a large majority of the images are a lion and lamb with the quote, now why would that be?

Jehovahs witnesses a well know for editing bibles to suit their own needs.

A regular KJV is different to a Jehovah's Witness KJV.

show me evidence of it saying lion in isaiah 11:6 in one single translation EVER then!

show me IN the bible, not some long cover up damagae control bs article made to sooth the sheep either.

So you only want the evidence you want?

Confirmation bias much?

oh, taste of your own medicine? Answer a question with a question, again afraid to accept the challenge and change the subject because part of you is sooooooo terrified you may be wrong? Show me in a bible if you are so sure.

I can't because it doesn't exist. It's a misunderstanding that's been pointed out to you numerous times. Just because you deny it's true, doesn't it make false.

YOU said with quite the tone of determination that you believed this was the fault of the JWs changing their bibles.... more back peddling

How is that back peddling? JWs change their bibles. It's VERY well known. I can't show you in a bible because it doesn't exist in main stream bibles.

Next time, try this. Think before you type.

if you are so sure then go get a hard copy and take a picture with your phone! Not that hard. We both know very well I am not denying there are different bible translations and I agree 100% about the JWs being a fraud, but I can guaranee you isaiah 11:6 was not changed in thier bible as you were insinuating.

Why would I go out of my way to do that? There's proof of it all over the internet. There's plenty of websites that show all the things added, removed and edited in JWs bibles.

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: hidingthistime
If there was no ice cap shown even back in 1935, then how did the icecaps supposedly melt?

1935? I didn't know Google Earth predates the Internet.

Not to mention satellite imagery. Our world is so behind the times.

originally posted by: Phage

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: hidingthistime
If there was no ice cap shown even back in 1935, then how did the icecaps supposedly melt?

1935? I didn't know Google Earth predates the Internet.

Not to mention satellite imagery. Our world is so behind the times.

And it even predates the first rocket-born camera image of the planet by about 11 years.

Go google!

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: hidingthistime

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: hidingthistime

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: hidingthistime

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: hidingthistime

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: hidingthistime

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: hidingthistime

People have known about (and written about) the so-called "lion and the lamb" discrepancy for some time.

Typically, when someone is thinking of the “lion and the lamb,” Isaiah 11:6 is in mind due to it often being misquoted, “And the wolf will dwell with the lamb, and the leopard will lie down with the young goat, and the calf and the young lion and the fatling together.”

The true “Lion and the Lamb” passage is Revelation 5:5–6. The Lion and the Lamb both refer to Jesus Christ. He is both the conquering Lion of the tribe of Judah and the Lamb who was slain. The Lion and the Lamb are descriptions of two aspects of the nature of Christ. As the Lion of Judah, He fulfills the prophecy of Genesis 49:9 and is the Messiah who would come from the tribe of Judah. As the Lamb of God, He is the perfect and ultimate sacrifice for sin.

Link

Look what y'all have made me do ... quoting the Bible. Jeez.

yes, good find, but it also said that at isaiah 11:6, and the jehovahs witnesses used to use them as paralelles to the harmony they saw between the old and new testament.

Just google isaiah 11:6 and you will see a large majority of the images are a lion and lamb with the quote, now why would that be?

Jehovahs witnesses a well know for editing bibles to suit their own needs.

A regular KJV is different to a Jehovah's Witness KJV.

show me evidence of it saying lion in isaiah 11:6 in one single translation EVER then!

show me IN the bible, not some long cover up damagae control bs article made to sooth the sheep either.

So you only want the evidence you want?

Confirmation bias much?

oh, taste of your own medicine? Answer a question with a question, again afraid to accept the challenge and change the subject because part of you is sooooooo terrified you may be wrong? Show me in a bible if you are so sure.

I can't because it doesn't exist. It's a misunderstanding that's been pointed out to you numerous times. Just because you deny it's true, doesn't it make false.

YOU said with quite the tone of determination that you believed this was the fault of the JWs changing their bibles.... more back peddling

How is that back peddling? JWs change their bibles. It's VERY well known. I can't show you in a bible because it doesn't exist in main stream bibles.

Next time, try this. Think before you type.

if you are so sure then go get a hard copy and take a picture with your phone! Not that hard. We both know very well I am not denying there are different bible translations and I agree 100% about the JWs being a fraud, but I can guaranee you isaiah 11:6 was not changed in thier bible as you were insinuating.

Why would I go out of my way to do that? There's proof of it all over the internet. There's plenty of websites that show all the things added, removed and edited in JWs bibles.

then show me an example that is relevent to this thread, or are you again just burying my good information under pages and pages of your distract and redirerct tactics?

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: hidingthistime
If there was no ice cap shown even back in 1935, then how did the icecaps supposedly melt?

1935? I didn't know Google Earth predates the Internet.

the satellite images. Not google earth.. come on! Stop with the twisting words. You are a word salad expert.... brutal.

originally posted by: hidingthistime

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: hidingthistime

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: hidingthistime

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: hidingthistime

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: hidingthistime

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: hidingthistime

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: hidingthistime

People have known about (and written about) the so-called "lion and the lamb" discrepancy for some time.

Typically, when someone is thinking of the “lion and the lamb,” Isaiah 11:6 is in mind due to it often being misquoted, “And the wolf will dwell with the lamb, and the leopard will lie down with the young goat, and the calf and the young lion and the fatling together.”

The true “Lion and the Lamb” passage is Revelation 5:5–6. The Lion and the Lamb both refer to Jesus Christ. He is both the conquering Lion of the tribe of Judah and the Lamb who was slain. The Lion and the Lamb are descriptions of two aspects of the nature of Christ. As the Lion of Judah, He fulfills the prophecy of Genesis 49:9 and is the Messiah who would come from the tribe of Judah. As the Lamb of God, He is the perfect and ultimate sacrifice for sin.

Link

Look what y'all have made me do ... quoting the Bible. Jeez.

yes, good find, but it also said that at isaiah 11:6, and the jehovahs witnesses used to use them as paralelles to the harmony they saw between the old and new testament.

Just google isaiah 11:6 and you will see a large majority of the images are a lion and lamb with the quote, now why would that be?

Jehovahs witnesses a well know for editing bibles to suit their own needs.

A regular KJV is different to a Jehovah's Witness KJV.

show me evidence of it saying lion in isaiah 11:6 in one single translation EVER then!

show me IN the bible, not some long cover up damagae control bs article made to sooth the sheep either.

So you only want the evidence you want?

Confirmation bias much?

oh, taste of your own medicine? Answer a question with a question, again afraid to accept the challenge and change the subject because part of you is sooooooo terrified you may be wrong? Show me in a bible if you are so sure.

I can't because it doesn't exist. It's a misunderstanding that's been pointed out to you numerous times. Just because you deny it's true, doesn't it make false.

YOU said with quite the tone of determination that you believed this was the fault of the JWs changing their bibles.... more back peddling

How is that back peddling? JWs change their bibles. It's VERY well known. I can't show you in a bible because it doesn't exist in main stream bibles.

Next time, try this. Think before you type.

if you are so sure then go get a hard copy and take a picture with your phone! Not that hard. We both know very well I am not denying there are different bible translations and I agree 100% about the JWs being a fraud, but I can guaranee you isaiah 11:6 was not changed in thier bible as you were insinuating.

Why would I go out of my way to do that? There's proof of it all over the internet. There's plenty of websites that show all the things added, removed and edited in JWs bibles.

then show me an example that is relevent to this thread,

I already did, pages ago. You just didn't accept it.

or are you again just burying my good information under pages and pages of you 4 distract and redirerct tactics?

Am I the only person posting? I'm sure there's atleast 4.

originally posted by: Phage

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: hidingthistime
If there was no ice cap shown even back in 1935, then how did the icecaps supposedly melt?

1935? I didn't know Google Earth predates the Internet.

Not to mention satellite imagery. Our world is so behind the times.

stop the mocking, you guys arent that dense, you know very well I meant the satelite imagry history on google earth.

originally posted by: hidingthistime

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: hidingthistime
If there was no ice cap shown even back in 1935, then how did the icecaps supposedly melt?

1935? I didn't know Google Earth predates the Internet.

the satellite images.

Weren't around in 1935

Not google earth.. come on! Stop with the twisting words. You are a word salad expert.... brutal.

Considering we were talking about Google Earth it's quite a logical step to assume you were taking about the same. Either way, no satellite images existed in 1935.

a reply to: hidingthistime

stop the mocking, you guys arent that dense, you know very well I meant the satelite imagry history on google earth.

How can there be satellite imagery on Google Earth from 1935, how can there be satellite imagery anywhere when there were no satellites in 1935?

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: hidingthistime

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: hidingthistime

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: hidingthistime

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: hidingthistime

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: hidingthistime

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: hidingthistime

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: hidingthistime

People have known about (and written about) the so-called "lion and the lamb" discrepancy for some time.

Typically, when someone is thinking of the “lion and the lamb,” Isaiah 11:6 is in mind due to it often being misquoted, “And the wolf will dwell with the lamb, and the leopard will lie down with the young goat, and the calf and the young lion and the fatling together.”

The true “Lion and the Lamb” passage is Revelation 5:5–6. The Lion and the Lamb both refer to Jesus Christ. He is both the conquering Lion of the tribe of Judah and the Lamb who was slain. The Lion and the Lamb are descriptions of two aspects of the nature of Christ. As the Lion of Judah, He fulfills the prophecy of Genesis 49:9 and is the Messiah who would come from the tribe of Judah. As the Lamb of God, He is the perfect and ultimate sacrifice for sin.

Link

Look what y'all have made me do ... quoting the Bible. Jeez.

yes, good find, but it also said that at isaiah 11:6, and the jehovahs witnesses used to use them as paralelles to the harmony they saw between the old and new testament.

Just google isaiah 11:6 and you will see a large majority of the images are a lion and lamb with the quote, now why would that be?

Jehovahs witnesses a well know for editing bibles to suit their own needs.

A regular KJV is different to a Jehovah's Witness KJV.

show me evidence of it saying lion in isaiah 11:6 in one single translation EVER then!

show me IN the bible, not some long cover up damagae control bs article made to sooth the sheep either.

So you only want the evidence you want?

Confirmation bias much?

oh, taste of your own medicine? Answer a question with a question, again afraid to accept the challenge and change the subject because part of you is sooooooo terrified you may be wrong? Show me in a bible if you are so sure.

I can't because it doesn't exist. It's a misunderstanding that's been pointed out to you numerous times. Just because you deny it's true, doesn't it make false.

YOU said with quite the tone of determination that you believed this was the fault of the JWs changing their bibles.... more back peddling

How is that back peddling? JWs change their bibles. It's VERY well known. I can't show you in a bible because it doesn't exist in main stream bibles.

Next time, try this. Think before you type.

if you are so sure then go get a hard copy and take a picture with your phone! Not that hard. We both know very well I am not denying there are different bible translations and I agree 100% about the JWs being a fraud, but I can guaranee you isaiah 11:6 was not changed in thier bible as you were insinuating.

Why would I go out of my way to do that? There's proof of it all over the internet. There's plenty of websites that show all the things added, removed and edited in JWs bibles.

then show me an example that is relevent to this thread,

I already did, pages ago. You just didn't accept it.

or are you again just burying my good information under pages and pages of you 4 distract and redirerct tactics?

Am I the only person posting? I'm sure there's atleast 4.

no, you did not show me one example, from an actual bible, stop twisting words and filling my threds with your irrelevant empty garbage that buries all the good information.

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: hidingthistime

stop the mocking, you guys arent that dense, you know very well I meant the satelite imagry history on google earth.

How can there be satellite imagery on Google Earth from 1935 when there were no satellites in 1935?

got me there, it just shows history on google earth.... that would be google earths bad...

originally posted by: hidingthistime

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: hidingthistime

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: hidingthistime

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: hidingthistime

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: hidingthistime

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: hidingthistime

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: hidingthistime

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: hidingthistime

People have known about (and written about) the so-called "lion and the lamb" discrepancy for some time.

Typically, when someone is thinking of the “lion and the lamb,” Isaiah 11:6 is in mind due to it often being misquoted, “And the wolf will dwell with the lamb, and the leopard will lie down with the young goat, and the calf and the young lion and the fatling together.”

The true “Lion and the Lamb” passage is Revelation 5:5–6. The Lion and the Lamb both refer to Jesus Christ. He is both the conquering Lion of the tribe of Judah and the Lamb who was slain. The Lion and the Lamb are descriptions of two aspects of the nature of Christ. As the Lion of Judah, He fulfills the prophecy of Genesis 49:9 and is the Messiah who would come from the tribe of Judah. As the Lamb of God, He is the perfect and ultimate sacrifice for sin.

Link

Look what y'all have made me do ... quoting the Bible. Jeez.

yes, good find, but it also said that at isaiah 11:6, and the jehovahs witnesses used to use them as paralelles to the harmony they saw between the old and new testament.

Just google isaiah 11:6 and you will see a large majority of the images are a lion and lamb with the quote, now why would that be?

Jehovahs witnesses a well know for editing bibles to suit their own needs.

A regular KJV is different to a Jehovah's Witness KJV.

show me evidence of it saying lion in isaiah 11:6 in one single translation EVER then!

show me IN the bible, not some long cover up damagae control bs article made to sooth the sheep either.

So you only want the evidence you want?

Confirmation bias much?

oh, taste of your own medicine? Answer a question with a question, again afraid to accept the challenge and change the subject because part of you is sooooooo terrified you may be wrong? Show me in a bible if you are so sure.

I can't because it doesn't exist. It's a misunderstanding that's been pointed out to you numerous times. Just because you deny it's true, doesn't it make false.

YOU said with quite the tone of determination that you believed this was the fault of the JWs changing their bibles.... more back peddling

How is that back peddling? JWs change their bibles. It's VERY well known. I can't show you in a bible because it doesn't exist in main stream bibles.

Next time, try this. Think before you type.

if you are so sure then go get a hard copy and take a picture with your phone! Not that hard. We both know very well I am not denying there are different bible translations and I agree 100% about the JWs being a fraud, but I can guaranee you isaiah 11:6 was not changed in thier bible as you were insinuating.

Why would I go out of my way to do that? There's proof of it all over the internet. There's plenty of websites that show all the things added, removed and edited in JWs bibles.

then show me an example that is relevent to this thread,

I already did, pages ago. You just didn't accept it.

or are you again just burying my good information under pages and pages of you 4 distract and redirerct tactics?

Am I the only person posting? I'm sure there's atleast 4.

no, you did not show me one example, from an actual bible, stop twisting words and filling my threds with your irrelevant empty garbage that buries all the good information.

I did link to a site that explained pretty well why it is interpreted the way it is.

a reply to: hidingthistime
Like information about missing satellite images from 1935?

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: hidingthistime

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: hidingthistime
If there was no ice cap shown even back in 1935, then how did the icecaps supposedly melt?

1935? I didn't know Google Earth predates the Internet.

the satellite images.

Weren't around in 1935

Not google earth.. come on! Stop with the twisting words. You are a word salad expert.... brutal.

Considering we were talking about Google Earth it's quite a logical step to assume you were taking about the same. Either way, no satellite images existed in 1935.

I agree with that, google earth is misleading there.