It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
yes, and like I said, a "damage control" article is in no way concrete evidence shown in an actual bible...
originally posted by: TerryDon79
originally posted by: hidingthistime
no, you did not show me one example, from an actual bible, stop twisting words and filling my threds with your irrelevant empty garbage that buries all the good information.
originally posted by: TerryDon79
I already did, pages ago. You just didn't accept it.
originally posted by: hidingthistime
then show me an example that is relevent to this thread,
originally posted by: TerryDon79
originally posted by: hidingthistime
if you are so sure then go get a hard copy and take a picture with your phone! Not that hard. We both know very well I am not denying there are different bible translations and I agree 100% about the JWs being a fraud, but I can guaranee you isaiah 11:6 was not changed in thier bible as you were insinuating.
originally posted by: TerryDon79
originally posted by: hidingthistime
YOU said with quite the tone of determination that you believed this was the fault of the JWs changing their bibles.... more back peddling
originally posted by: TerryDon79
I can't because it doesn't exist. It's a misunderstanding that's been pointed out to you numerous times. Just because you deny it's true, doesn't it make false.
originally posted by: hidingthistime
oh, taste of your own medicine? Answer a question with a question, again afraid to accept the challenge and change the subject because part of you is sooooooo terrified you may be wrong? Show me in a bible if you are so sure.
originally posted by: TerryDon79
originally posted by: hidingthistime
show me evidence of it saying lion in isaiah 11:6 in one single translation EVER then! show me IN the bible, not some long cover up damagae control bs article made to sooth the sheep either.
originally posted by: TerryDon79
originally posted by: hidingthistime
yes, good find, but it also said that at isaiah 11:6, and the jehovahs witnesses used to use them as paralelles to the harmony they saw between the old and new testament.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: hidingthistime
People have known about (and written about) the so-called "lion and the lamb" discrepancy for some time.
Typically, when someone is thinking of the “lion and the lamb,” Isaiah 11:6 is in mind due to it often being misquoted, “And the wolf will dwell with the lamb, and the leopard will lie down with the young goat, and the calf and the young lion and the fatling together.”
The true “Lion and the Lamb” passage is Revelation 5:5–6. The Lion and the Lamb both refer to Jesus Christ. He is both the conquering Lion of the tribe of Judah and the Lamb who was slain. The Lion and the Lamb are descriptions of two aspects of the nature of Christ. As the Lion of Judah, He fulfills the prophecy of Genesis 49:9 and is the Messiah who would come from the tribe of Judah. As the Lamb of God, He is the perfect and ultimate sacrifice for sin.
Link
Look what y'all have made me do ... quoting the Bible. Jeez.
Just google isaiah 11:6 and you will see a large majority of the images are a lion and lamb with the quote, now why would that be?
Jehovahs witnesses a well know for editing bibles to suit their own needs.
A regular KJV is different to a Jehovah's Witness KJV.
So you only want the evidence you want?
Confirmation bias much?
How is that back peddling? JWs change their bibles. It's VERY well known. I can't show you in a bible because it doesn't exist in main stream bibles.
Next time, try this. Think before you type.
Why would I go out of my way to do that? There's proof of it all over the internet. There's plenty of websites that show all the things added, removed and edited in JWs bibles.
Am I the only person posting? I'm sure there's atleast 4.
or are you again just burying my good information under pages and pages of you 4 distract and redirerct tactics?
I did link to a site that explained pretty well why it is interpreted the way it is.
wow, you are stuck in broken record player mode pretty hard eh, on the one thing I agree on... what kind of tactic is that?
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: hidingthistime
it just shows history on google earth
Not satellite imagery from 1935.
originally posted by: hidingthistime
I agree with that, google earth is misleading there.
originally posted by: TerryDon79
Weren't around in 1935
originally posted by: hidingthistime
the satellite images.
originally posted by: TerryDon79
originally posted by: hidingthistime
If there was no ice cap shown even back in 1935, then how did the icecaps supposedly melt?
1935? I didn't know Google Earth predates the Internet.
Considering we were talking about Google Earth it's quite a logical step to assume you were taking about the same. Either way, no satellite images existed in 1935.
Not google earth.. come on! Stop with the twisting words. You are a word salad expert.... brutal.
originally posted by: hidingthistime
yes, and like I said, a "damage control" article is in no way concrete evidence shown in an actual bible...
originally posted by: TerryDon79
originally posted by: hidingthistime
no, you did not show me one example, from an actual bible, stop twisting words and filling my threds with your irrelevant empty garbage that buries all the good information.
originally posted by: TerryDon79
I already did, pages ago. You just didn't accept it.
originally posted by: hidingthistime
then show me an example that is relevent to this thread,
originally posted by: TerryDon79
originally posted by: hidingthistime
if you are so sure then go get a hard copy and take a picture with your phone! Not that hard. We both know very well I am not denying there are different bible translations and I agree 100% about the JWs being a fraud, but I can guaranee you isaiah 11:6 was not changed in thier bible as you were insinuating.
originally posted by: TerryDon79
originally posted by: hidingthistime
YOU said with quite the tone of determination that you believed this was the fault of the JWs changing their bibles.... more back peddling
originally posted by: TerryDon79
I can't because it doesn't exist. It's a misunderstanding that's been pointed out to you numerous times. Just because you deny it's true, doesn't it make false.
originally posted by: hidingthistime
oh, taste of your own medicine? Answer a question with a question, again afraid to accept the challenge and change the subject because part of you is sooooooo terrified you may be wrong? Show me in a bible if you are so sure.
originally posted by: TerryDon79
originally posted by: hidingthistime
show me evidence of it saying lion in isaiah 11:6 in one single translation EVER then! show me IN the bible, not some long cover up damagae control bs article made to sooth the sheep either.
originally posted by: TerryDon79
originally posted by: hidingthistime
yes, good find, but it also said that at isaiah 11:6, and the jehovahs witnesses used to use them as paralelles to the harmony they saw between the old and new testament.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: hidingthistime
People have known about (and written about) the so-called "lion and the lamb" discrepancy for some time.
Typically, when someone is thinking of the “lion and the lamb,” Isaiah 11:6 is in mind due to it often being misquoted, “And the wolf will dwell with the lamb, and the leopard will lie down with the young goat, and the calf and the young lion and the fatling together.”
The true “Lion and the Lamb” passage is Revelation 5:5–6. The Lion and the Lamb both refer to Jesus Christ. He is both the conquering Lion of the tribe of Judah and the Lamb who was slain. The Lion and the Lamb are descriptions of two aspects of the nature of Christ. As the Lion of Judah, He fulfills the prophecy of Genesis 49:9 and is the Messiah who would come from the tribe of Judah. As the Lamb of God, He is the perfect and ultimate sacrifice for sin.
Link
Look what y'all have made me do ... quoting the Bible. Jeez.
Just google isaiah 11:6 and you will see a large majority of the images are a lion and lamb with the quote, now why would that be?
Jehovahs witnesses a well know for editing bibles to suit their own needs.
A regular KJV is different to a Jehovah's Witness KJV.
So you only want the evidence you want?
Confirmation bias much?
How is that back peddling? JWs change their bibles. It's VERY well known. I can't show you in a bible because it doesn't exist in main stream bibles.
Next time, try this. Think before you type.
Why would I go out of my way to do that? There's proof of it all over the internet. There's plenty of websites that show all the things added, removed and edited in JWs bibles.
Am I the only person posting? I'm sure there's atleast 4.
or are you again just burying my good information under pages and pages of you 4 distract and redirerct tactics?
I did link to a site that explained pretty well why it is interpreted the way it is.
originally posted by: hidingthistime
wow, you are stuck in broken record player mode pretty hard eh, on the one thing I agree on... what kind of tactic is that?
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: hidingthistime
it just shows history on google earth
Not satellite imagery from 1935.
because in the video he shows on the slider bar going back on google earth in the timeline as far back as 1935. It is really annoying how you two keep fighting over videos you refuse to even watch... then when people watch them and see for themselves how good this guys knows geography, you guys look pretty foolish. He even measures things etc. He is not just willy nilly...
originally posted by: Phage
originally posted by: hidingthistime
wow, you are stuck in broken record player mode pretty hard eh, on the one thing I agree on... what kind of tactic is that?
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: hidingthistime
it just shows history on google earth
Not satellite imagery from 1935.
I'm trying to understand why you are talking about Google Earth satellite pictures and 1935.
originally posted by: hidingthistime
Bahahaha ohhhhh, so now you two, who have constantly mocked and belittled me are trying to "HELP?"
Bahahahhhahaha....... yeah, ok! Lmao
I understand that. Do you understand what that means? It means that somewhere in the area being viewed there is an image from 1935. Do you understand that if you zoom into the Arctic Ocean instead of most of the northern hemisphere, that earliest date becomes 1999 and that there are images (satellite images) of a few islands? Do you understand that any image from 1935 would be an aerial photograph and not a satellite image and there are none of the Arctic Ocean?
because in the video he shows on the slider bar going back on google earth in the timeline as far back as 1935. I
you know what, you guys are really off topic, plain and simple.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: hidingthistime
I understand that. Do you understand what that means? It means that somewhere in the area being viewed there is an image from 1935. Do you understand that if you zoom into the Arctic Ocean instead of most of the northern hemisphere, that earliest date becomes 1999 and that there are images (satellite images) of a few islands? Do you understand that any image from 1935 would be an aerial photograph and not a satellite image and there are none of the Arctic Ocean?
because in the video he shows on the slider bar going back on google earth in the timeline as far back as 1935. I
You really should try verifying what that guy says for yourself. Or, failing that, don't dismiss what some are telling you.
originally posted by: TerryDon79
a reply to: hidingthistime
The Arctic ice is still there.
Google "arctic from space" and you'll see loads of images. I'm on my phone so can't upload pictures.
originally posted by: hidingthistime
originally posted by: TerryDon79
a reply to: hidingthistime
The Arctic ice is still there.
Google "arctic from space" and you'll see loads of images. I'm on my phone so can't upload pictures.
But NOT on google earth! Like I said before, it is the same as isaiah 11:6 showing all the pictures of the lion and lamb, but you REFUSE to look at that angle of things. Hardcore denial!
Where did the polar ice caps go in our history?