It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: TsukiLunar
a reply to: pavil
I don't know. Did the liberal police burst down your door? No? Well then I guess your argument is hyperbole and therefore fallacious. NEXT!
originally posted by: TsukiLunar
Did the liberal police burst down your door?
originally posted by: reldra
originally posted by: infolurker
originally posted by: reldra
originally posted by: infolurker
LOL, this video is short but good. A reporter goes for the PC prize of the day and Trump shuts him down.
You mean politically correct? (Are you aware I don't care what whiners are offended, shut up.. ) I'll use Anchor Baby.
This is why Trump is becoming popular. He is not apologizing to the PC idiots or bowing to their usual whining.
It is offensive. It is not about being politically correct or not. I am really getting tired of the reverse rhetoric. Offensive and mean is suddenly being open and honest?
It is only considered "offensive" since 2011 when some immigration group got "Offended"
They can take a hike...
And take their "Offended Feelings" with them.
www.nytimes.com...
Definition:
It was defined as: “A child born to a noncitizen mother in a country that grants automatic citizenship to children born on its soil, especially such a child born to parents seeking to secure eventual citizenship for themselves and often other members of their family.”
Now they whined, now they "redifined it" as a Slur.
it troubled Mary Giovagnoli, the director of the Immigration Policy Center, a pro-immigration research group in Washington.
The once-obscure term has been used frequently in the recent debate over whether to change the Constitution to deny automatic American citizenship to children born in this country to illegal immigrant parents.
Last Friday morning, Ms. Giovagnoli posted an angry item on the center’s blog, saying the dictionary “masks the poisonous and derogatory nature of the term, a term which demeans both parent and child.” Her item soared into the blogosphere. By Friday afternoon, Mr. Kleinedler had called Ms. Giovagnoli.
His editors huddled over the weekend, and on Monday a new definition of “anchor baby” was posted on the dictionary’s Web site. It started with “offensive,” in italics: “Used as a disparaging term for a child born to a noncitizen mother in a country that grants automatic citizenship to children born on its soil, especially when the child’s birthplace is thought to have been chosen in order to improve the mother’s or other relatives’ chances of securing eventual citizenship.”
Yes, someone found it to be offensive. Then the actual dictionary agreed it was. Then conservatives started using it a LOT in a derogatory fashion.
originally posted by: Kangaruex4Ewe
a reply to: reldra
Ok. Can I call a hoe a hoe? Calling a spade a spade is a saying that has been around long before I was born. If others choose to use the term incorrectly that is not my fault. Calling a spade a spade is a saying that came about specifically because people were not calling things what they were...
I have never used it to replace the n-word and I'm not going to start acting like that's what the phrase means. If that's the way others take it, it certainly is not my problem.
Calling a spade a spade is calling it what it is... Not the n-word. If we keep going we are going to have to start using sign language because every word we use is going to become offensive to someone.
originally posted by: TsukiLunar
a reply to: IAMTAT
Amazing... non-pc people sure are concerned about being pc(whatever in the world that is).
originally posted by: ketsuko
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: TsukiLunar
Exactly.
It appears that what we have here is a group of people that are praising him for using a term or phrase in reference to a race issue, because they are uneducated on the origins and usage of the term itself.
That's like calling someone the n-word and then praising them for it because their not being "PC", yet they don't know the derogatory nature of the term.
So illegal immigration is a race issue? People from all over the world and all ethnicities come here illegally and all of them can take advantage of the anchor baby loophole.
You think only white people have a problem with illegal immigration? I think you need to think again.
originally posted by: woodwardjnr
Someone needs to ask him where he found the drowned rat on his baldy head, why he's so ashamed of being bald or folically challenged
originally posted by: Kangaruex4Ewe
a reply to: Hefficide
I live in the South and all my days on this earth (nearing 40 years) I have NEVER heard anyone call a black person a spade. Not ever. I'm certainly not saying that you haven't heard it, obviously you have at some point but I have never heard it used that way. I have heard the n-word plenty, along with all the other ignorant crap people call black people but I have never heard spade used as a racial slur.
originally posted by: Teikiatsu
originally posted by: woodwardjnr
Someone needs to ask him where he found the drowned rat on his baldy head, why he's so ashamed of being bald or folically challenged
I think his answers (and he would give them) would be entertaining.
originally posted by: pavil
originally posted by: TsukiLunar
a reply to: pavil
I don't know. Did the liberal police burst down your door? No? Well then I guess your argument is hyperbole and therefore fallacious. NEXT!
Ha! You complain about someone for their words, then you call them a name, yet you can't see the irony of that? Very nice.
originally posted by: Sremmos80
a reply to: ketsuko
You can say it all you want.
People are just going to call you an a hole for doing so.
Which then people cry about complaining that is the PC police.
They champion they have the right to say it but forget people have the right to be against it.
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: kellyjay
It's not just Mexicans. The Vietnamese find it offensive too.
originally posted by: ketsuko
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: TsukiLunar
Exactly.
It appears that what we have here is a group of people that are praising him for using a term or phrase in reference to a race issue, because they are uneducated on the origins and usage of the term itself.
That's like calling someone the n-word and then praising them for it because their not being "PC", yet they don't know the derogatory nature of the term.
So illegal immigration is a race issue? People from all over the world and all ethnicities come here illegally and all of them can take advantage of the anchor baby loophole.
You think only white people have a problem with illegal immigration? I think you need to think again.
The term itself is rooted in a racial origin and Trump himself has equated illegal immigration to Mexicans in his own speeches and comments.
I'm not turning this in to race out of my own will. Trump has already done that himself.
originally posted by: reldra
originally posted by: Kangaruex4Ewe
Anchor babies are what they are. The only reason anyone is offended by that term is because it shows people are aware of what is going on concerning "anchor babies". It is fact that people do come here when they are ready to give birth for that very reason. A fact. So why is it offensive?
I don't think it is any more offensive than baby boomer, Generation X, etc. God help us all if the baby boomers start getting offended by that term. That's a lot of offendedness to happen all at once. It might actually tear a hole in the space time continuum.
Changing the term doesn't change the fact. I think lots of folks hope that is what will happen though. That's why they are so rabid that other folks say it "the correct way". Trump isn't buying into the PC speak.
A spade is a spade... Oops?!
It is termed as offensive in the dictionary. There are people who have come to the US just to give birth, but how many? Is it a large number? A small number? Conservatives use that term in a derogatory way on purpose. A Fact.
Oops? I am surprised at that spade comment. Glad you aren't moderating this thread.
originally posted by: TsukiLunar
originally posted by: pavil
originally posted by: TsukiLunar
a reply to: pavil
I don't know. Did the liberal police burst down your door? No? Well then I guess your argument is hyperbole and therefore fallacious. NEXT!
Ha! You complain about someone for their words, then you call them a name, yet you can't see the irony of that? Very nice.
I am not complaining about people calling eachother names. What I am complaining about is stupid argument that people should not be offended when you say offensive things. I never said don't say offensive things, what I said was that if you can't understand why the things you are saying often offend people then maybe you should stop speaking. Language is complicated I know, but this concept is very simple and I have explained it very well . When you say things you know that offend people,and they get offended, you are not th e good guy and a champion free speech.
originally posted by: masqua
So, we're not talking about Trump's antics any longer?
OK
I'll wait until everyone decides to explore every bigoted word out there. Don't forget to include 'bastard'.
*munches popcorn*