It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: TorqueyThePig
a reply to: Shamrock6
I don't know, did the shop owner try any de-escalation techniques first?
Why did he shoot the bad guy five times? Isn't that excessive?
Couldn't he have just shot the gun out of the guys hand, or maybe in his knee?
Geez, how dare he defend his life and his livelihood...
How could he actually know if the robbers were going to hurt him?
originally posted by: WHWIV
The reason the argument is silly is because that shop owner is not a person who went to an academy and given training in how to deal with these types of scenarios. Presumably a police officer has. Really though the shop owner almost died and probably should have just cooperated. What's your life worth? Not any amount of money, I can tell you that.
It's "case in point" just FYI.
I can drop an entire database kept by a media outlet that shows the overwhelming number of shootings by police are against armed people.
The problem is that when it's bad, it's bad. And people post it when it's bad, and other people aren't able to understand that those incidents are in the vast minority because they never hear about all the righteous shootings or all the times nobody gets OC sprayed or Tased or arrested. So, since they never hear about those things, they never happen. Since they do hear about the comparative few times something goes wrong, well that must be how it always happens!
Yes the cases you mention are tragic indeed.
juz beez a low iQ pooleece offica.
That said, your handful of cases do not erase the hundreds of thousands of cases in which the criminal had a real gun and indeed shot someone.
I don't know, did the shop owner try any de-escalation techniques first?
Why did he shoot the bad guy five times? Isn't that excessive?
Couldn't he have just shot the gun out of the guys hand, or maybe in his knee?
Geez, how dare he defend his life and his livelihood...
How could he actually know if the robbers were going to hurt him?
Taking that into consideration, if you point what looks like a real gun at me, I will shoot you.
But hey what do I know?
originally posted by: Involutionist
What a childish petty attempt at projecting your bias and ignoring the many extreme cases in the past where police in the States shoot people who are unarmed for no logical reason other than ineptitude, fear, ego and poor training.
Trust me, you have not, nor will you ever manipulate my emotions.
Which has what to do with when there is a reason and people still complain?
originally posted by: beyondtruth
a reply to: TorqueyThePig
I have a feeling this is sarcasm or at least I hope it is... I also pray you are never put in this situation because if so I don't think you have a chance in hell in making it out in one piece
I'm not one of "those" people that runs around trying to score cheap feelings of intellectual superiority thanks to grammar and spelling. Next time, if there is a next time, I'll send you a message about it. It wasn't a cheap shot at all, though I do see how it came across that way. You have my apology for it.
At the same time, though, I don't like seeing posts that make it sound as if cops are running around shooting blindly all day, every day. Because the overwhelming majority of law enforcement isn't shooting anybody on any given day. No other first world country has the same set of problems that U.S. law enforcement has to deal with. There are poor decisions being made, and those decisions have life altering or life ending consequences sometimes. But a lot of right decisions are made that nobody ever hears about. Every day.
No other first world country has the same set of problems that U.S. law enforcement has to deal with.
There are poor decisions being made, and those decisions have life altering or life ending consequences sometimes. But a lot of right decisions are made that nobody ever hears about. Every day.