It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: 5StarOracle
a reply to: Annee
I am saying the source is biased and non factual...
originally posted by: 5StarOracle
a reply to: Aloysius the Gaul
the fact that it is not accepted as "proven"
originally posted by: 5StarOracle
a reply to: peter vlar
i said there was more being debated and I suppose much is supposed but I don't remember ever hearing it is a fact we evolved from monkeys or apes...
but it is fact there is no evidence that can prove so...
I had a source and the information is accepted as fact...
My bad for not providing a link I did not claim to have Been the one who had proven said facts...
originally posted by: 5StarOracle
a reply to: Aloysius the Gaul
So now it is fact that evolution is the root of all thing
and is indeed fact?
that's what proven would mean...
originally posted by: Aloysius the Gaul
and is indeed fact?
yes
when I try to talk about Darwinism with some people, their eyes glaze over and they start panicking and saying things like:
'Evolution HAS to be true because the only alternative is an old man up in the sky, with a white beard.'
How do you know that is the only alternative? Who told you this?
Darwin's theory: a steaming pile of dung
"Scientists who go about teaching that evolution is a fact of life are great con men, and the story they are telling may be the greatest hoax ever. In explaining evolution we do not have one iota of fact.’ [T.N. Tahmisian, physiologist for the Atomic Energy Commission].
Evolution is little more that a series of stories that loosely almost appear to fit some old evidence. These stories keep being adapted to try to fit new evidence, but now we know too much to believe any of those stories. Evolution isn't science. One evolutionist said: "... All the evolutionary stories I learned as a student... have now been debunked..." ~ Dr. Derek V. Ager
Evolution Has Long Been Debunked
"Darwin's so-called theory of evolution is based on absurdly irrational propositions, which did not come from scientific observations, but were artificially introduced from the outside, for political-ideological reasons."
Jonathan Tennenbaum
Ever since the time of Darwin, part of the major press has been given the task of disseminating Darwinist indoctrination. The Darwinists of the time were well aware that the theory of evolution would never be corroborated by any scientific evidence, but produced a Darwinist dictatorship as the result of systematic and organized activities and charged part of the major press with spreading the fraud. The press in question is still at work today. The only difference is that the Darwinist fraud they perpetrate has now been exposed.
Darwinist Propaganda Techniques
The theory of evolution can never recover from the obvious objection to it, that there are no credible (in other words ones that have not been proved to be fake or which require a huge dose of faith) transitional fossils in the fossil record when there should be billions of them. If evolution's continuous morphing were really going on, every fossil would show change underway throughout the creature, with parts in various stages of completion. The gradual morphing of one type of creature to another that evolution predicts is nowhere to be found.
There should have been millions of transitional creatures if evolution were true. In the "tree of life" that evolutionists have dreamed up, gaps in the fossil record are especially huge between single-cell creatures, complex invertebrates (such as snails, jellyfish, trilobites, clams, and sponges), and what evolutionists claim were the first vertebrates, fish. In fact, there are no fossil ancestors at all for complex invertebrates or fish. That alone is fatal to the theory of evolution. The fossil record shows that evolution never happened.
originally posted by: 5StarOracle
a reply to: Annee
I am saying the source is biased and non factual...
more important to include the fact he is an evolutionist...
originally posted by: Murgatroid
Not one single particle of scientifically provable evidence has been found in support of it.
originally posted by: 5StarOracle
a reply to: Annee
although things may evolve that does not mean that evolution is the answer for man or the origins of anything other then point out the fact that things progress...
I imagined at things are relate because only so many building blocks are used...
It makes as much sense as saying my cousin and I are the same because we are related...
originally posted by: Murgatroid
Not one single particle of scientifically provable evidence has been found in support of it.
originally posted by: 5StarOracle
a reply to: Aloysius the Gaul
The truth as you broke it down could only be no no yes
Evolution remains unproven,
evolution of man from ape or monkey has not been proven...
So therefore not fact...
originally posted by: Murgatroid
In fact, there are no fossil ancestors at all for complex invertebrates or fish. That alone is fatal to the theory of evolution. The fossil record shows that evolution never happened.