Feel the Bern-ie Sanders

This is VERY telling...



This version is larger so you can read it...

i.imgur.com...


Do a little research on their recent campaign contributions and it looks the same. Hillary's top donors are all huge corporations and 1%ers. Bernie's contributions are coming from small groups and individuals.

a reply to: Answer Groups that represent actual people are giving to and are for Sanders. How refreshing.
Excellent post!!!

a reply to: ugmold

S&F, got a good chuckle!

Bernie is totally awesome!

originally posted by: LDragonFire

originally posted by: beezzer
a reply to: ugmold

Bernie alone can't do it.

I like him, but it's just more of the "one side is better than the other side".

"Oh Yes He Can!!!!!!" oh I couldn't resist!

Why not just say, "Hope and Change"?

originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: beezzer

I think Alan Grayson would be his perfect running mate.

How would that appeal to republicans?

Or do you WANT more division in the country?

originally posted by: beezzer

originally posted by: LDragonFire

originally posted by: beezzer
a reply to: ugmold

Bernie alone can't do it.

I like him, but it's just more of the "one side is better than the other side".

"Oh Yes He Can!!!!!!" oh I couldn't resist!

Why not just say, "Hope and Change"?

What does it matter????

a reply to: Answer

Gotta say, I agree.

double post

originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: beezzer

I think Alan Grayson would be his perfect running mate.

I had no idea who Alan Grayson was. Now I do. It is a good choice. I like the bills he sponsored. They actually make sense. Alan Grayson

TY for pointing him out

a reply to: Answer

Look at the difference in coin.

That's really just sickening. In very real terms, he stands not a chance in hell. I hope I'm wrong, but...

originally posted by: beezzer

originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: beezzer

I think Alan Grayson would be his perfect running mate.

How would that appeal to republicans?

Or do you WANT more division in the country?

I am not very interested in appealing to Republicans. I am not interested in division, either. But are you looking for a mixed ticket?

a reply to: reldra

A mixed ticket might be the key to solving, not all, but some of the divisiveness that's being foisted off on us.

I like the idea. The parties don't, which of course, only makes it more appealing to me.

Why are we supporting any candidate that only appeals to one half of the country?

Why is it, that any candidate is only concerned with winning just 51% of the vote?

I'm coming at this as a partisan son-of-a-bitch who was so wrapped up into winning, that I missed it.

Where are the candidates that appeal to 90% of the population?

Are we that divided as a nation that we can never agree anymore?

I know, Obama said, "Get over it, we won."

Well, are you or any of us going to "get over it"? Coming from the past 7 years of Obama, I'd say, no. Just more division..

More separation.

No unity.

No peace.

originally posted by: seagull
a reply to: reldra

A mixed ticket might be the key to solving, not all, but some of the divisiveness that's being foisted off on us.

I like the idea. The parties don't, which of course, only makes it more appealing to me.

It might be.

originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: burdman30ott6

However in three swing states so far... he's neck and neck with Clinton. He continues to draw bigger and bigger crowds, the largest of any candidate. Keep in mind too there hasn't been any debates yet. Sadly the DNC is limiting the debates to a really low number, two I think. Bernie supports have petitioned for more.

Quinnipiac

What I find more interesting is whose leading in those swing states

I'm down with Bernie. Been hoping he'd run for years.

originally posted by: reldra

originally posted by: beezzer

originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: beezzer

I think Alan Grayson would be his perfect running mate.

How would that appeal to republicans?

Or do you WANT more division in the country?

I am not very interested in appealing to Republicans. I am not interested in division, either. But are you looking for a mixed ticket?

Yes.

I know you aren't interested in 50% of the country. I understand that you don't care about them.

I get it that you think they are wrong.

I feel the same way about your ideology and you.

But how has that served us?

Are we better for it?

a reply to: beezzer

Trump seems to appeal to Republican voters... that's why they can't win the Presidency to begin with.

originally posted by: beezzer
Why are we supporting any candidate that only appeals to one half of the country?

Why is it, that any candidate is only concerned with winning just 51% of the vote?

I'm coming at this as a partisan son-of-a-bitch who was so wrapped up into winning, that I missed it.

Where are the candidates that appeal to 90% of the population?

Are we that divided as a nation that we can never agree anymore?

I know, Obama said, "Get over it, we won."

Well, are you or any of us going to "get over it"? Coming from the past 7 years of Obama, I'd say, no. Just more division..

More separation.

No unity.

No peace.

It would be very difficult to have a mixed ticket. I see your point. But I will not accept people who are against equal rights, want to peek into my bedroom, and start multiple wars we can't pay for. There are a few more issues, but I will not move on those.

originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: beezzer

Trump seems to appeal to Republican voters... that's why they can't win the Presidency to begin with.

Does he appeal to liberal voters?