It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: galaga
originally posted by: xuenchen
I wonder if the employment rate went up there?
I wonder if those people moved away?
I wonder if they turned to doing illegal things to make up for the loss?
Or were those people doing illegal stuff already?
]]
originally posted by: xuenchen
Maine has a 4.7% unemployment rate.
It has been dropping for a couple of years.....
Maine BLS tables
originally posted by: Stormdancer777
a reply to: 3n19m470
Let me ask you why would anyone drop out of the program just because they have to work a few hours?
You think people would rather steal or sell drugs?
originally posted by: Milomo
It's unbelievable there are people who are against this. There's so much work that needs to be done. Picking up trash on the side of the roads, picking weeds, whatever. It absolutely disgusts me that people would advocate giving my money to someone for doing nothing instead of working a few hours a week to get that stuff done.
There is such a divide between the attitudes of those for and against this it's insane. Liberals will literally try and make any excuse possible to keep from working. Conservatives man up and find a way.
There's literally tens of thousands of people hired every single day. If you aren't one of them you are likely inferior in some way to those who are. There's not done vast network keeping liberals down and out.
originally posted by: Asktheanimals
I reckon doing 24 hours a month for about $ 200 worth of food is probably a little better than minimum wage anyway. Considering the alternative of going hungry while laying about it doesn't sound like it's too unfair.
This could go as a national trend which is a good thing.
As others have mentioned corporate welfare needs to end even more badly as the cost far outweighs any social programs.
originally posted by: mOjOm
20 hours a week or 80 hours a month and the average money paid to a single person is about $150 a month in food stamps. That comes out at just under $2 an hour and this is supposed to be progress??? Give me a break.
originally posted by: Mugly
a reply to: trollz
they do it in my state as well but not for everyone. i dont know the criteria.
my brother in law is a giant turd and he gets food assistance.
he is perfectly able to work he just wont.
he is supposed to do like 20 hours of work as well but he fakes it all the time.
he has his father sign a paper saying he cuts his grass and cleans his yard and #. of course he doesnt do anything of the sort but thats how easy it is to scam it
originally posted by: xuenchen
originally posted by: fshrrex
a reply to: xuenchen
With all due respect...This quote was not in the OP Source article. If It was it would have been a better conversation.
That's why some research is always a smart thing to do.
Especially when something sounds lopsided.
The MSM has many people totally freaked out.
Another point.....
Maine has around 1.3 million population.
Only a few thousand get food stamps.
The low percentage compared to the national level is something to look at.
And, Maine voted for Obama in 2012.
There are a lot of Democrats in Maine.
Their problems may not be entirely the fault of Republicans.
This is a huge victory for the Republicans of Maine and of course the sore loser Democrats are trying to tarnish the reformation’s success. Democrats are urging for special measures to ease back on some of the new requirements because they are too strict. However, their response is ill-fated because even if the requirements loosen up, once someone is removed from Maine’s food stamp program, it will be another three years before they can receive benefits again from the program.
originally posted by: FyreByrd
originally posted by: Asktheanimals
I reckon doing 24 hours a month for about $ 200 worth of food is probably a little better than minimum wage anyway. Considering the alternative of going hungry while laying about it doesn't sound like it's too unfair.
This could go as a national trend which is a good thing.
As others have mentioned corporate welfare needs to end even more badly as the cost far outweighs any social programs.
You are not taking into account the 'cost' to the volunteer for 'volunteering' childcare, trasportation and other associated costs - are the agencies going to feed them?
This is just - no not just - this is a way to external costs for both government and business and, as is 'fair', they will get what they pay for - substandard work. It's a means of forcing people off the rolls and into the streets.
Since October, healthy adults without children have been required to work at least 20 hours a week, volunteer or participate in a work-training program to continue receiving benefits in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program after three months. It's the result of the administration's decision to no longer seek a waiver for the federal requirement, which it had used since 2008.