It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: grandmakdw
a reply to: JohnnyCanuck
a reply to: kaylaluv
a reply to: autopat51
People with children are exempt from the requirement
That nullifies your post, sorry.
originally posted by: Char-Lee
originally posted by: bobs_uruncle
originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
a reply to: bobs_uruncle
As a man who was unemployed and facing a tough situation in 2009, i can tell you that requiring a person to attend job training in return for SNAP seems very, very reasonable. And were such a measure available to me in 1999, I would have been extremely thankful for it. As it turns out I got lucky and found a corporation that was willing to give me a playground to learn job skills in. Not everyone gets that kind of gig.
This is the state using the states money to make the state a better place. Not make victims, but make more capable workers. Or, at the very least, give the community something back out of their tax dollars by requiring 24 hours a month of community service for people unwilling/unable to recieve job training.
Im kind of baffled how this is not a good thing.
Regardless, it is still extortion. I agree with job retraining and developing a work ethic that will sustain people. I don't agree with calling things what they are not. One cannot equate extortion with volunteering.
Cheers - Dave
It seems simple you CAN volunteer or not so it is voluntary.
People I know have high speed internet and get food 'stamps' card.
What they lack is a sense of self worth. The volunteering very often leads to real jobs and even careers it gives a person feed back from others and can change lives.
the judge assigned me to work in the public library for a few hours per week. it was really wonderful feeling needed there and paying my debt at the same time
originally posted by: Mugly
a reply to: theantediluvian
aaaaaaaaaaaaw
all the poor, able bodied people with no jobs.
poor poor them
lets keep making up more excuses like their transmissions going out and no work within miles
lame
originally posted by: xuenchen
the amount of SNAP recipients has dramatically dropped from 12,000 to approximately 2,500
guess they cleaned up that program !!!!!
originally posted by: TheConstruKctionofLight
a reply to: Char-Lee
the judge assigned me to work in the public library for a few hours per week. it was really wonderful feeling needed there and paying my debt at the same time
I agree with the sentiments of most of your post, however please explain in simple terms how assisting in a public library paid as, in monetarily paid, for the damage to the other car or person? What did the Library reimburse them in dollars's?
Or do you mean you repaid a debt to society in general? How did this help the other person involved in the accident. Were they able to claim on some "uninsured Government fund". I'd like to know you're reasoning. Thanks
originally posted by: grandmakdw
a reply to: JohnnyCanuck
a reply to: kaylaluv
a reply to: autopat51
People with children are exempt from the requirement
That nullifies your post, sorry.
originally posted by: grandmakdw
a reply to: JohnnyCanuck
a reply to: kaylaluv
a reply to: autopat51
People with children are exempt from the requirement
That nullifies your post, sorry.