It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: grandmakdw
So you are saying that for people to respect all Black people, they must first earn the respect?
originally posted by: BuzzyWigs
a reply to: grandmakdw
I am saying that a person - ANY person - is not "entitled" to respect. Their actions earn them respect. Respect is given by people - by individuals - not by law.
Understanding and tolerance and acceptance are not "respect."
She will notice you, and condescend to address you, but before she will respect you, you have to demonstrate to her that you are worthy.
And I am saying it is wrong, evil, hateful
to condemn a group as large as Christians
and tell them until all of them do
whatever it is you think they should do,
they don't deserve respect.
originally posted by: Seamrog
originally posted by: grandmakdw
So you are saying that for people to respect all Black people, they must first earn the respect?
No, she is not.
She is saying that everyone must earn HER respect.
She will notice you, and condescend to address you, but before she will respect you, you have to demonstrate to her that you are worthy.
originally posted by: BuzzyWigs
a reply to: grandmakdw
And I am saying it is wrong, evil, hateful
to condemn a group as large as Christians
and tell them until all of them do
whatever it is you think they should do,
they don't deserve respect.
Grams, do you respect me?
originally posted by: grandmakdw
originally posted by: BuzzyWigs
a reply to: grandmakdw
I am saying that a person - ANY person - is not "entitled" to respect. Their actions earn them respect. Respect is given by people - by individuals - not by law.
Understanding and tolerance and acceptance are not "respect."
And I am saying it is wrong, evil, hateful
to condemn a group as large as Christians
and tell them until all of them do
whatever it is you think they should do,
they don't deserve respect.
You are then saying it is ok to tolerate and understand Black or LGBT people but we don't have to respect them until they as an individual do something worthy of respect? (that is the equivalent of what you are saying about Christians; I personally think that stance is the highest form of condescension)
That is the equivalent of saying, well we will tolerate (how generous of you);
we will understand (how condescending) Christians until each one as an
individual does something to deserve respect, we refuse to respect them,
that each individual must prove their worth, while all the others do not deserve respect.
And I am saying it is wrong, evil, hateful
to condemn a group as large as Christians
and tell them until all of them do
whatever it is you think they should do,
they don't deserve respect.
originally posted by: TzarChasm
originally posted by: grandmakdw
originally posted by: BuzzyWigs
a reply to: grandmakdw
I am saying that a person - ANY person - is not "entitled" to respect. Their actions earn them respect. Respect is given by people - by individuals - not by law.
Understanding and tolerance and acceptance are not "respect."
And I am saying it is wrong, evil, hateful
to condemn a group as large as Christians
and tell them until all of them do
whatever it is you think they should do,
they don't deserve respect.
You are then saying it is ok to tolerate and understand Black or LGBT people but we don't have to respect them until they as an individual do something worthy of respect? (that is the equivalent of what you are saying about Christians; I personally think that stance is the highest form of condescension)
That is the equivalent of saying, well we will tolerate (how generous of you);
we will understand (how condescending) Christians until each one as an
individual does something to deserve respect, we refuse to respect them,
that each individual must prove their worth, while all the others do not deserve respect.
would you make the same argument on behalf of muslims?
originally posted by: grandmakdw
That is the equivalent of saying, well we will tolerate (how generous of you);
we will understand (how condescending) Christians until each one as an
individual does something to deserve respect, we refuse to respect them,
that each individual must prove their worth, while all the others do not deserve respect.
originally posted by: BuzzyWigs
a reply to: grandmakdw
And I am saying it is wrong, evil, hateful
to condemn a group as large as Christians
and tell them until all of them do
whatever it is you think they should do,
they don't deserve respect.
Who did I 'condemn'?
I don't condemn anyone! I don't think hell exists. I can (and have a right to) decide for myself if an individual of any persuasion, station, socio-economic, racial, or religious status deserves my personal "respect."
she would die of apoplexy.
And I am saying it is wrong, evil, hateful
to condemn a group as large as Christians
and tell them until all of them do
whatever it is you think they should do,
they don't deserve respect.
originally posted by: grandmakdw
originally posted by: Indigo5
a reply to: grandmakdw
Not sure what all that was about..You claimed it was impossible for the 10 Commandments to be displayed in a non-secular context.
I direct you to Mel Brooks at the top of the page...was that comedy or church?
Comedy, art, Architecture, History...et al. I can appreciate a great religious themed painting without pondering Christianity and can appreciate great architecture with religious themed sculptures without needing to contemplate Jesus's dying for our sins etc.
Yes, context matters.
No, I was saying that if the Supreme Court declared the 10 Commandments to be religious and to be removed from a courthouse because it is religious. Then all courthouses and places of government, should remove the 10 Commandments from their buildings and facades and carvings, in order to be just, fair and equal.
originally posted by: grandmakdw
originally posted by: BuzzyWigs
a reply to: grandmakdw
I am saying that a person - ANY person - is not "entitled" to respect. Their actions earn them respect. Respect is given by people - by individuals - not by law.
Understanding and tolerance and acceptance are not "respect."
And I am saying it is wrong, evil, hateful
to condemn a group as large as Christians
and tell them until all of them do
whatever it is you think they should do,
they don't deserve respect.