It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: OpinionatedB
a reply to: CharlieSpeirs
Yes you did, you said the man should not have published the cartoons knowing he might die for it.
Dying for a cartoon is today. Dying for choosing a religion other than Islam is tomorrow.
When do people stop being "stupid" for refusing to do what they want Charlie?
originally posted by: CharlieSpeirs
a reply to: queenofswords
They didn't kill for free speech reasoning...
They killed for what they perceived to be an offence to them...
I'm not mixing up cause and correlation at all.
The cause was the cartoon, the article provides us with that at least.
originally posted by: OpinionatedB
a reply to: CharlieSpeirs
So why are you not speaking against this man's murder?
Why are you ONLY making this point saying this dead man's blood is on his own hands?
originally posted by: CharlieSpeirs
a reply to: OpinionatedB
I can call him a moron for his ineptitude and still not condone what happened.
Because I can see the idiocy of what occurred and others refuse to comment on it is tough.
I'll call idiocy in any situation, if that offends people, oh well.
originally posted by: spy66
They have already ID the Three shootes. Jesse's christ they work fast in France.
We should send Our police force to France to get some tips on how they do it. They must have a very good capturing rate of common theifs and Bank robers over there.
What a bunch of crap this is turing out to be.
originally posted by: OpinionatedB
a reply to: CharlieSpeirs
Yes you did, you said the man should not have published the cartoons knowing he might die for it.
Dying for a cartoon is today. Dying for choosing a religion other than Islam is tomorrow.
When do people stop being "stupid" for refusing to do what they want Charlie?