It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
i'm with the Inuit on this one and who better to hear it from imo.
There is so much more to add to this,i am quite convinced this is the effects of Planet X..which,as it happens, i have also seen at sunrise.
An interesting piece of anecdotal evidence i read the other day (taken for what it's worth) in that, a Guy from Panama (just above the equator) reported that the water went down His plughole a different way for a period of time and He speculates that the Northern Hemisphere crossed into the South..quite a 'wobble' right there!
At present, the mean obliquity currently decreases by 0.0130° (46.8'') per century.
No. You presented a photograph of the Moon. A photograph which demonstrates absolutely nothing.
As for Planet X, i have presented plenty of actual evidence in the form of data and so on,
I challenge anyone to provide a better hypothesis!! there is not one as far as i'm aware.
Oh. Secret documents that you have access to. Ok.
conversely i had info on leaked documents saying otherwise and not to mention that volcanoes can indeed produce more co2 in a day than humans in a year
The Sun is where it should be. I can verify this.
The Sun is also far too high and low at zenith and IS indeed rising and setting in areas where it should not-again anyone can verify this.
No, it is related to the height of the apparent horizon.
This is clearly 'wobble' related..here it is again:
On the other hand, I am perfectly willing to continue with someone who spouts nonsense for as long as it takes.
I am quite up for a debate on this site,but saying that i am not prepared to endlessly debate with someone who doesn't want to see the truth for what ever reason.
Mostly internal camera reflections. If it is planet X, why does it play peek-a-boo? Why can't everyone see it, everywhere?
As for "a better hypothesis" i was alluding to the so called second sun sightings..if they are not PX then what else?
The hypothetical object at nearly 200 au could also be in near resonance (3:2) with the one at nearly 250 au (e.g. if one is at 202 au and the other at 265 au, it is almost exactly 3:2).