a reply to: Jukiodone
The TR-3Bs are real, and continue to be improved and updated. (You can read earlier posts in this thread for details.) They have gravity-cancelling
(not total anti-grav), and can fly atmospheric OR in space. They are housed all over the world, and the media-blackout about them is crumbling as
they continue to be seen and photographed everywhere.
I wouldn't worry about the Russians. According to FOIA docs in the Reading Room at DIA (Defense Intelligence Agency), the Russians got to the Moon
before we did, and our "Apollo astronauts confirmed what we'd already learned from the Russians about the Moon." And a few posts ago, I linked to a
Jane's Defense Weekly article about super-secret research in anti-gravity, and a Russian scientist who is now the go-to expert for the actual physics.
(Basically, the science has been worked out; getting anti-gravity into workable hardware is the stumbling block.)
So the Russians and us are probably neck-in-neck with Advanced Tech like anti-gravity. How much of this is retro-engineered Alien Tech, and/or
updated Nazi technology is open to speculation. (After WWII, we got the rocket scientists in Operation Paperclip. Russia seemed to have gone after
the Nazi engineers - who could make the science "work" - and raided the Nazi's advanced air-flight companies.)
HORTEN HO 229
The other super-power, China, seems to be relying on unconventional weaponry, like lasers and possibly scalar weapons. (And, since both Russia and
China had sky-spirals of identical "failed missile tests" a few years back, China may be pursuing vortex-technology instead of anti-gravity for
WHY CHINA IS USING LASERS TO TAKE DOWN DRONES
"China has developed and successfully tested technology to shoot down drones with lasers, according to state media. The mechanism can also take down
various other small aircraft within a two-kilometer radius within five seconds of locating its target, the China Academy of Engineering Physics, one
of the system's co-developers, claimed in a statement Sunday."
edit on 5-11-2014 by MKMoniker because: correction, typo, clarification