It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

GOP lawmaker calls on Sarah Palin to lead new party to replace Republicans

page: 3
10
<< 1  2    4  5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 6 2014 @ 05:15 PM
link   
a reply to: Gryphon66

Apologies.

Sarah Palin is a dumb ####

And Warren and Clinton are saviours to the world.



Thanks!




posted on Aug, 6 2014 @ 05:16 PM
link   

originally posted by: beezzer
You see, when Hillary Clinton or Warren runs, we will be able to be just as critical of them as the leftists were of Palin.


You can be as critical of Clinton or Warren (or Obama or Pelosi or "progressives") as you want, and Sarah Palin had nothing to do with it. Criticism is always "allowed"...

The victim position is hardly flattering.

Hey, you'll love this!




posted on Aug, 6 2014 @ 05:18 PM
link   
Sarah's verbal diahrea is always entertaining in that cartoony-sterotypical-right-wing kinda way..
Has anyone watched her sarahpalinchannel? I bet it makes Fox News look moderate.

She is a gift to SNL and Late Night.



posted on Aug, 6 2014 @ 05:25 PM
link   

originally posted by: rupertg
Sarah's verbal diahrea is always entertaining in that cartoony-sterotypical-right-wing kinda way..
Has anyone watched her sarahpalinchannel? I bet it makes Fox News look moderate.

She is a gift to SNL and Late Night.



These two "Sarah Surrealism's" as I like to call them are classic.

www.youtube.com...


www.youtube.com...



posted on Aug, 6 2014 @ 05:29 PM
link   
a reply to: rupertg

I actually enjoyed that outdoor show she had for a while (Sarah Palin's Alaska). She really should stick with what she knows.

Commentary of the Sarah Palin Channel


If you're willing to spend more money than you currently drop on Netflix, you can now get the Sarah Palin Channel online, which promises to "discuss the great issues of the day and work towards solutions."


She CHARGES for the online channel! LOL Good Grief!



posted on Aug, 6 2014 @ 05:37 PM
link   

originally posted by: beezzer
a reply to: Indigo5

So I take it that calling Warren or Clinton both idiots who don't have the brain power to run a pissants motorcycle around a cheerrio would be taken unkindly?



Unkindly?...Politics is not know for "kindness"....I reserve kindliness in judgment for those that aren't so confident and ambitious (or Palin's case Godzilla size arrogance) that they feel they deserve to run the country.

Warren and Clinton, objectively may be many things, good or bad as you choose affiliation and politics, but as far as "brain power" they are both in a different league than Sarah Palin...as are both you and I and most posters on this forum for that matter..

Palin is different than most political candidates in that she demonstrated a Godzilla sized arrogance along with an indifference to actual "thinking" and is easily OFFENDED by anyone that expects her to actually know what SHE HERSELF is talking about.

...I mean it's painful to watch...She invites criticism with her over-inflated love of her own opinions and the indignation she adopts when anyone asks her to explain her own opinions.


edit on 6-8-2014 by Indigo5 because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 6 2014 @ 05:38 PM
link   
I guess she would lead it half way to the elections then run off with what stuff she can get.



posted on Aug, 6 2014 @ 05:47 PM
link   

originally posted by: marg6043
a reply to: Benevolent Heretic

You can tell that everything she supports is about global agendas and religious rights fundamentalism. She has not brain her agendas are not her own but of those that are pushing and supporting her as a politician.



There hasn't been a candidate with his/her own mind or philosophy since before the civil war.

If she has the right support behind her that would be a win win.

She wont have the right support behind her though. She was dressed like a casino dealer at her first appearance as a Vice-Presidential Candidate.

Sarah Palin has a classy presence, but agrees to too much deference or has suffered brainwashing to be a restoring american leader.

Warren and Hillary are just plain divine government nightmares.



posted on Aug, 6 2014 @ 06:01 PM
link   
Hillary and Warren are collectivist monkeys. Never had an independent thought in their lives. At best they confuse good intentions with reality, like their voters. At worst they think they should tell you to do everything. They are BORG.

At least Sarah Palin respects individuality and limited government, at some level.

Republicans will disappear or coopt all opposition to one world government.

I wouldn't be surprised if Sarah Palin doesn't want to be a Republican.



posted on Aug, 6 2014 @ 06:14 PM
link   

originally posted by: beezzer
You see, when Hillary Clinton or Warren runs, we will be able to be just as critical of them as the leftists were of Palin. Palins' critics set the bar, so to speak. So thank you Sarah Palin.
Because Palin is so very obviously their intellectual equal.
H L Menken said "No one ever went broke underestimating the intelligence of the American public." Palin could get elected...but either way, the campaign would be a hoot!



posted on Aug, 6 2014 @ 06:42 PM
link   
I'm no Sarah Palin fan (she was big reason that was the only Presidential Election I didn't vote in), but you guys are without a doubt being unfair to the woman. Go to a PTA meeting you'll see 50 more like her, maybe worse. She could be my neighbor, and I could probably tolerate her in my house for dinner one night, only one though. I'd have her over before Obama, Bush, Cheney, Hillary Clinton, Biden, Harry Reid, or Feinstein.



posted on Aug, 6 2014 @ 06:50 PM
link   
What a awful idea, but I'm not surprised. Every time a third party appears to have a chance at power, they trot out the Christians. A history lesson will show you how Ross Perot's party was over taken by the religious right, with pat Buchanan eventually taking over from Ross Perot and running the third party into extinction.

Fact is is that the TEA party has a legitimate shot at becoming a third party and displacing the GOP. But only if it is a fiscal conservative party, with strong support for the constitution and the Bill of Rights.

Every time I see the religious right starting to rebrand their movement as the Tea Party, I cringe. The reason I cringe is that these people are progressives and socialists bent on using the state to legislate cultural, social and economic norms according to their views. These people want to violate the Bill of Rights and are anti-American.

Next time you see a person who is from the religious right just remember that the religious right are not politically conservative. They can claim to be a religious conservative movement, but as soon as they try to use the government and the coercive power of the state to enforce their beliefs, they are engaged in social engineering and they are socialists.

Religious conservative, Yes. Politically conservative, definitely Not.

That plan to marry the Tea party with the religious socialists will spell the end of the Tea Party. But then again, that is probably the idea cooked up by the GOP establishment.



posted on Aug, 6 2014 @ 06:52 PM
link   
So just to be clear, people can insult Palin with impunity but no-one can say anything against progressive women like Clinton or Warren.

Good to see that double standards are being kept!




posted on Aug, 6 2014 @ 07:07 PM
link   

originally posted by: beezzer
So just to be clear, people can insult Palin with impunity but no-one can say anything against progressive women like Clinton or Warren.

Good to see that double standards are being kept!



What kind of BS are you selling here? There are plenty of threads mocking and dissing every liberal, progressive democrat in politics and some of them you participated in.

Here's one ragging on Hillary....


www.abovetopsecret.com...

Here's another

www.abovetopsecret.com...

what double standard? Are you drinkin?


In politics it's open season on everyone!
edit on 6-8-2014 by olaru12 because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 6 2014 @ 07:16 PM
link   

originally posted by: olaru12

what double standard? Are you drinkin?


Not today. But I can start!




In politics it's open season on everyone!


I appreciate the straight answer.




posted on Aug, 6 2014 @ 09:30 PM
link   

originally posted by: beezzer
So just to be clear, people can insult Palin with impunity but no-one can say anything against progressive women like Clinton or Warren.
Good to see that double standards are being kept!

Here's a history lesson from Palin. Can you find an equivalent statement from either Clinton or Warren? C'mon...



posted on Aug, 6 2014 @ 09:50 PM
link   

originally posted by: JohnnyCanuck

originally posted by: beezzer
So just to be clear, people can insult Palin with impunity but no-one can say anything against progressive women like Clinton or Warren.
Good to see that double standards are being kept!

Here's a history lesson from Palin. Can you find an equivalent statement from either Clinton or Warren? C'mon...


Here's some from Hillary




www.snopes.com...

edit on 6-8-2014 by Semicollegiate because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 7 2014 @ 07:30 AM
link   
a reply to: Semicollegiate

What a bunch of crap! You forgot to add this from your link:



This list of purported "Marxist" quotes by former first lady, senator, presidential candidate, and secretary of state Hillary Clinton is (like many collections of utterances from various political figures) difficult to rate as strictly "true" or "false": She did make the statements reported above, but they have all been stripped of any explanatory context, and some of them had portions elided, creating potentially misleading impressions about the nature of those statements. Below we verify the source and complete wording of each statement on this list and provide the context in which it was made. (All of these entries date from between 2004 and 2007, during which time Hillary Clinton represented the state of New York in the U.S. Senate.)
Read more at www.snopes.com...


Let's take the first one, for example. She was speaking to a group of wealthy democrats on repealing the Bush tax cuts to get the economy back on track: In context, it reads:



"Many of you are well enough off that ... the tax cuts may have helped you," Sen. Clinton said. "We're saying that for America to get back on track, we're probably going to cut that short and not give it to you. We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good."
Read more at www.snopes.com...


You really should read your entire source before posting something.

PS. This thread is about Sarah Palin, not Hillary Clinton.
edit on 8/7/2014 by Benevolent Heretic because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 7 2014 @ 07:32 AM
link   
a reply to: Semicollegiate
a) context is everything
b) you may not agree with what she is saying, but it appears to be presented in coherent sentences, and
c) if you actually read the snopes page that you are citing, it totally validates my comment 'a'

Sorry Dude...massive fail.



posted on Aug, 7 2014 @ 07:47 AM
link   

originally posted by: beezzer
a reply to: Gryphon66

Apologies.

Sarah Palin is a dumb ####

And Warren and Clinton are saviours to the world.



Thanks!


Every issue doesn't have to be so ridiculously EXTREME ... it really doesn't.

Blind adherence to ideological BS in this country as reached proportions of ludicrosity.



You're welcome.



new topics

top topics



 
10
<< 1  2    4  5 >>

log in

join