It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: jjkenobi
Does anyone hear actually think she's less intelligent or less qualified for a government office than Nancy bat crazy Pelosi?
Sounds like everyone here drank the media's kool-aid assault on her.
originally posted by: yuppa
..... She could a won the nomination for president by wearing sexy clothes and other things.....
originally posted by: jjkenobi
Does anyone hear actually think she's less intelligent or less qualified for a government office than Nancy bat crazy Pelosi?
originally posted by: Iscool
a reply to: olaru12When I started listening to Sarah Palin I saw the her positions were pretty much in agreement with my positions...It would be nice if those who oppose Sarah could post what political positions they are in opposition to, instead of just bad mouthing her...
originally posted by: beezzer
I like her.
You see, when Hillary Clinton or Warren runs, we will be able to be just as critical of them as the leftists were of Palin. Palins' critics set the bar, so to speak.
originally posted by: beezzer
a reply to: Indigo5
But you do agree that criticism should be allowed regardless of the political affiliation, correct?
originally posted by: beezzer
I like her.
You see, when Hillary Clinton or Warren runs, we will be able to be just as critical of them as the leftists were of Palin.
originally posted by: beezzer
Palins' critics set the bar, so to speak.
originally posted by: beezzer
a reply to: Indigo5
So I take it that calling Warren or Clinton both idiots who don't have the brain power to run a pissants motorcycle around a cheerrio would be taken unkindly?
lolz
They are both evil, stupid, disgusting women who should just shut the hell up.
(just trying it out, you understand. . . . )