It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: OpinionatedB
a reply to: ~Lucidity
...perhaps if you realized exactly what these mean to the children of our nation, you would understand more.
originally posted by: xuenchen
It's just one more means of control.
The ultra-Progressives can't stand any individualism to exist anywhere.
Everything must be approved from a national central committee.
originally posted by: RedmoonMWC
originally posted by: xuenchen
It's just one more means of control.
The ultra-Progressives can't stand any individualism to exist anywhere.
Everything must be approved from a national central committee.
You are correct, it is about control, control of the people, control of the children and control of the purse strings.
By eliminating this income stream they make the schools more dependent upon the government grant money.
It is not a federal concern how the local school board raises extra money for the things they need to do their job of educating our children and grandchildren. If this came from a local school board I wouldn't have much to say about it other than that I disagree, but from the federal government which has no business mandating ANYTHING locally it is totally unacceptable.
"Schools have relied on these types of sales as revenue streams for sports, cheering clubs, marching bands," said David Sevier, deputy executive director of the Tennessee Board of Education. "We get the obesity issue, but we don't want to jerk this out from under the kids."
originally posted by: incoserv
originally posted by: pheonix358
... What will be next. What can be next after banning cupcakes.
At this point, it doesn't matter what's next. It's over.
originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
You just gotta loophole it.
I haven't read the law, and am spitballing here....but wouldn't a parents association be able to conduct a bake sale outside the auspices of federal jurisdiction? What if a group of parents gathered around to have a bake sale...is that violating the law?
I keep saying: don't beg for freedom...just be free. Even if you have to be crafty about doing it.
originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
You just gotta loophole it.
I haven't read the law, and am spitballing here....but wouldn't a parents association be able to conduct a bake sale outside the auspices of federal jurisdiction? What if a group of parents gathered around to have a bake sale...is that violating the law?
I keep saying: don't beg for freedom...just be free. Even if you have to be crafty about doing it.
originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
a reply to: beezzer
if you would like to start eliminating stupid laws, please start with almost any other one than this one. While i like bake sales....this is pretty low on the priority list.
It allowed for "infrequent" fundraisers, and states were allowed to decide how many bake sales they would have that didn't meet nutrition standards.
...
Each state can mandate the number of daytime fundraisers held each year that buck the nutrition requirements. But so far, 32 states have opted to stay strictly in the healthy zone, according to a draft report from the School Nutrition Association, which said the final number could change before the school year begins.
...
The Obama administration said it has provided states flexibility with the rules, which cover schools that participate in the federal school meals programs. "We defer to the states to make decisions that made sense to them," said Sam Kass, executive director of Let's Move!
...
Said Tennessee's Mr. Sevier: "It's not like we're going to have a brigade of black helicopters coming in to check."