posted on Jul, 8 2014 @ 12:33 PM
originally posted by: DarknStormy
You can assume he was wrong all you like,
I assume nothing. I state the FACT that he's been proven wrong. All of the Abrahamic religions have been.
but your examples are taken in a literal context and that does not prove anything.
Uh ... hello ... yes it does.
Archeology cannot prove things like the above wrong.
Archeology absolutely does prove things like exodus wrong.
Science would likely prove the above right.
Science and archeology work hand in hand in disproving nonsense .. nonsense like that silly 'Exodus Pharoah washes up 3,000 years later' story that
you bought into. Archeology proved that all the Pharoahs of that time period were accounted for and that none of them drown. Archeology proved that
mummy wasn't a pharoah. Science proved that a mummy couldn't last in the ocean 3,000 years. Science proved all the mummies in the museum from that
time period had none that drown. So science and archeology proved your muslim 'feel good' story wrong. You bought into it without checking the
facts. Dangerous .. and not too smart.
This goes Much deeper than trying to simply discredit Mohammad, you have to prove everything in Islam wrong, not bits and pieces of
That's funny. When a murdering thief claims that God gave him visions, and those visions end up being wrong, then he's wrong and obviously God
didn't give him visions. And when a religion/political movement springs up from those fake visions, then that religion is also wrong. And no, just
because Muhammad might have guessed something correct, that absolutely does NOT validate the entire religion. Not even close. If that's the case
then all of Christianity is validated because they got a few things correct. Ditto the Buddhists. Ditto the Hindus. See? It doesn't work that
So everyone is wrong because you and your scientific community say so?
All the Abrahamic religions are wrong because they are irrefutably proven wrong.
It's just that simple.