It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The first manned moon flyby of 7K-L1, aimed to beat the Apollo 8, was planned for 08.12.1968, but was cancelled due to the high risk because of the unreliable rocket and spacecraft, despite the fact that the crew petitioned to the Politbureau of the Communist Party asking to fly to the Moon without delay in order to beat the USA. When this spaceship was launched in the unmanned cofiguration on 20.01.1969, the Proton rocket exploded, although the descent capsule has been safely ejected.
ru.wikipedia.org...
originally posted by: SayonaraJupiter
At this point in the thread I would like to ask is anyone out there still clinging to the idea that the Soviets required an N-1 rocket to perform a manned lunar orbit mission prior to January 1, 1970?? Anyone??????? Anyone????????????????????? Phage??????
originally posted by: Rob48
Nobody is disputing that the Russians COULD have launched a manned mission to LUNAR ORBIT without the N-1.
Nothing available to provide the translunar injection boost. Proton gets you to orbit. Then what? You need another kick in the pants. A booster you can dock with and be able to burn on command.
The thing about the lunar missions is that a commitment has to be made early on in the development process; orbital rendezvous or a single vehicle. You can't change horses in midstream. The Soviets, like the US, committed to a single launch. The Saturn V worked, the N1 didn't.
"Former NASA director James E. Webb said it was quote the most important demonstration of total space ca-pability up to now by any na-tion. unquote" Published in "The Day", a newspaper out of New London, Connecticut, Thursday, November 14, 1968 from a report filed by "JODRELL BANK, England (AP)
However, SJ is a bit hung up on the multiple vehicle approach (send up different stuff one at a time with lighter launch vehicles, dock them all together, and use that to go orbit the moon), which to give SJ credit: it is a valid approach, and had been discussed as he showed much earlier on.
originally posted by: SayonaraJupiter
a reply to: eriktheawful
However, SJ is a bit hung up on the multiple vehicle approach (send up different stuff one at a time with lighter launch vehicles, dock them all together, and use that to go orbit the moon), which to give SJ credit: it is a valid approach, and had been discussed as he showed much earlier on.
I like the multiple vehicle idea because it was Wernher von Braun's original moon plan, which he described in several Walt Disney videos in the mid-1950's. When I am looking at the contemporary sources from the Sept.-Dec. 1968 news clips, there are two very prominent western media sources who indicated that Zond 5 meant that a Soviet lunar orbit mission was "imminent".
Sir Bernard Lovell of the Jodrell Bank facility also promoted space platform idea in the Schenectady Gazette - Wednesday, July 17, 1963.
originally posted by: SayonaraJupiter
a reply to: Saint Exupery
Thank you for posting the nice space timeline. But if your purpose was to emphasize Soviet space failures during that timeframe then you must also endure the very long list of USA space failures during that time frame.
Lunar Orbiter story Aug 12 1966 "If Orbiter attains its planned moon orbit, it will be the first successful lunar orbit for American spacecraft - after seven failures."
originally posted by: Saint Exupery
1968 November 10 – Zond 6 Failure
Failed Zond circumlunar mission. On the way back from the Moon, the capsule depressurized, then (2 days later) crashed due to parachute failure.
Now things get interesting...
Instead of taking this long-view,JFK, LBJ & your hero, Nixon treated the Moon Landing as a propaganda stunt.
Instead of taking this long-view,JFK, LBJ & your hero, Nixon treated the Moon Landing as a propaganda stunt.
originally posted by: SayonaraJupiter
Moon landings are a propaganda stunt. Thank you.
originally posted by: Saint Exupery
1968 November 10 – Zond 6 Failure
Failed Zond circumlunar mission. On the way back from the Moon, the capsule depressurized, then (2 days later) crashed due to parachute failure.
Now things get interesting...
originally posted by: SayonaraJupiter
Things do get interesting.
Zond A Rehearsal? Sep 23 1968
"The moon is closer to earth now. More precisely, it is closer to Soviet scientists," said Soviet scientis S. Yesenov on tv. "Soviet announcements hinted a ship like Zond 5 might carry the first cosmonaut in the attempt to orbit the moon and return." "Western scientists said Zond 5 was big enough to carry a man."
originally posted by: SayonaraJupiter
Facts & Interpretations Part 3
Soviet cosmonaut Valery Bykovsky made statements in Budapest "Russia was likely to send a number of rockets around the moon and bring them back to earth before sending men to the moon, and he added that the first passen-gers on these early test flights could be dogs."
Bykovsky was correct because the Russians did send a number of rockets around the moon and bring them back. But the Russians never send men to the moon, or dogs. So he was wrong on that.
originally posted by: SayonaraJupiter
My question to the space experts in this thread is :
When did Sir Bernard Lovell change his opinion on the vexing problem of radiation damage?
Link to source
news.google.com...