It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
squarehead666
When are you lot going to wake up and realise that poking the Russian Bear with a pointy stick is a bloody stupid idea?
What was the US vessel doing in the Black Sea? Making a point!
What was the Russian fighter doing? Making a point right back!
If the US wants a full scale apocalyptic war with, possibly the toughest, most determined people on the planet, they are going the right way.....Russia is not Iraq, Afghanistan or Libya.
In WWII the Soviet Union absorbed over 20 million casualties compared to the 400-450 thousand suffered by America or Britain.....So don't ever imagine these people will roll over in fear of the mighty west!
So what's it to be? A more reasonable attitude to the Russians (ie: stop trying to back them into a geopolitical corner).....Or back to the stone age for all of us?
As Vladimir Putin is very probably thinking right now....."It's your move punk!"edit on 14-4-2014 by squarehead666 because: s&p
TDawgRex
reply to post by Zaphod58
There was a pause for a bit from the Russian side as they didn't have the funding.
But there has been quite the uptick over the past decade.
Cold War 2.0
Vovin
TritonTaranis
Consider NATO is many many time larger than the Russian military with better tech the odds are slim to none putting asides thermo nuclear
NATO is an imperialist alliance with the goal of maintaining western global hegemony.
Russia is an imperialist superpower with the goal of regional hegemony.
NATO’s continuation and enlargement
Russian officials say that NATO should have been disbanded at the end of the Cold War, and that the accession of new Allies from Central and Eastern Europe undermines Russia’s security.
NATO was not disbanded after the Cold War because its members wanted to retain the bond that had guaranteed security and stability in the transatlantic area, as the London Declaration makes clear: “We need to keep standing together, to extend the long peace we have enjoyed these past four decades”. Upholding the values that have always guided it, NATO became more than a powerful military Alliance: it became a political forum for dialogue and cooperation.
NATO’s Open Door policy has been, and will always be, based on the free choice of European democracies. When Ukraine decided to pursue a “non-bloc policy,” NATO fully respected that choice. Russia’s long-time assertion that NATO tried to force Ukraine into its ranks was, and remains, completely false.
NATO has fulfilled the terms of Article 10 of the North Atlantic Treaty (available here) which states that Allies “may, by unanimous agreement, invite any other European State in a position to further the principles of this Treaty and to contribute to the security of the North Atlantic area to accede to this Treaty.”
On six occasions, between 1952 and 2009, European countries made the choice to apply for membership based on a democratic process and respect for the rule of law. NATO Allies made the unanimous choice to accept them.
NATO and EU enlargement has helped the nations of Central and Eastern Europe to tackle difficult reforms, which were required prior to accession. It has helped their citizens enjoy the benefits of democratic choice, the rule of law, and substantial economic growth. These efforts have moved Europe closer to being whole, free, and at peace than at any other time in history.
Russia also subscribed to this vision in the Founding Act. It committed to “creating in Europe a common space of security and stability, without dividing lines or spheres of influence,” and to “respect for sovereignty, independence and territorial integrity of all states and their inherent right to choose the means to ensure their own security.”
Contrary to those commitments, Russia now appears to be attempting to recreate a sphere of influence by seizing a part of Ukraine, maintaining large numbers of forces on its borders, and demanding, as Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov recently stated, that “Ukraine cannot be part of any bloc.”
elysiumfire
junglimogli:
Hey genius...
That's about the only thing you got right with your post, Mowgli...bear necessities and everything.
Well done.
Zaphod58
reply to post by LightningStrikesHere
The formal treaty isn't posted online. But overflights like this are a technical violation of the treaty.
eyeinoz
USA shouldnt be there,pull ur ship out,your not the world police,if i was putin i would give that ship hell till it pi55ed off,go back home for christ sake!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1AMERIKA lol
eyeinoz
USA shouldnt be there,pull ur ship out,your not the world police,if i was putin i would give that ship hell till it pi55ed off,go back home for christ sake!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1AMERIKA lol
rickynews
The Black Sea is in International Waters. U.S. Navy has as much right to be there as the Russian Navy.
hellobruce
rickynews
The Black Sea is in International Waters. U.S. Navy has as much right to be there as the Russian Navy.
And a Russian aircraft also has a right to be there... so why the fuss/