It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
more than likely they killed more of their relatives that they were cooped up with during the cold weather.
The law did not exist prior to July 2013.
there perhaps was confusion in the criminal
subculture as to when the law was coming into effect.
spirited75
where is your proof that "crime has gone down due to public ability to assist....internet and tv"
"there is really no proof of that..."
a majority of the studies that come out from professional
survey and pollsters conclude that crime has come down
since 1992 due to increased possession of firearms by law abiding citizens.
can you put that in your pipe and smoke it???
Antigod
NavyDoc
xuenchen
mugger
While it is good news that these citizens can finally exercise their 2nd amendment rights, the article is a bit misleading.
The first concealed carry permits were issued in late February, so the decrease in crime can’t yet be attributed to more people carrying guns. I'm sure in time, we will have a better record of how this pans out.
www.theblaze.com...
It was the mass fear and panic by the petty criminals.
They're dumb, but they knew what was going to happen, and they were also scared some people might take things into their own hands ahead of time.
I know this. I live here.
And a very good friend of mine is a Chicago Cop.
The police saw a difference right away.
And of course, many criminals didn't actually know when the CCW law was going into effect.
Rumors were all around that it was immediate.
Like I said, the petty criminals aren't that smart. They don't pay attention to laws anyway.
That's really the whole point of the deterrent effect of CCW. Criminals do not know who or when their potential victim might be armed. Even though the law wasn't really in effect, the THOUGHT they might see more CCW and this was a possible deterrent.
A lot of countries that have guns, don't allow hand guns. The UK is a prime example.
Handguns are great for crime, long guns (like rifles and shotguns) are hard to hide down the back of your pants when you want to rob a liquor store. Switzerland's guns are mainly rifles. I suspect when you find countries with guns but not so much gun crime it will be because they have mainly rifles and shotguns.
demongoat
NavyDoc
That's really the whole point of the deterrent effect of CCW. Criminals do not know who or when their potential victim might be armed. Even though the law wasn't really in effect, the THOUGHT they might see more CCW and this was a possible deterrent.
there is really no proof of that, crime in general has been dropping since 1992, and this has nothing to do with guns.
i believe crime has gone down due to the public's ability to assist law enforcement in capturing criminals through the internet and tv. more people are aware they can get their 15 minutes of fame by turning someone in for committing a crime.
no, this has to do with the growing risks to committing crime with all the camera phones and other systems around making it a challenge to break the law.
Phage
reply to post by spirited75
more than likely they killed more of their relatives that they were cooped up with during the cold weather.
Could be, weather could also be the reason for the lower murder count in January. People aren't going outside and killing people.
But what could account for the differences before the law passed?
edit on 4/8/2014 by Phage because: (no reason given)
Chicago officials touting the city’s crime statistics don’t have anything on Northwest Indiana.
The Northwest Indiana Times reports the area recorded zero homicides in January– a month that averages about five.
Local leaders aren’t crediting any special police tactics only the cold and snowy weather.
LaPorte County Coroner John Sullivan said they have not recorded any homicides in 2014; “When it’s 15 below no one is out,” he said, “not the good guys or the bad guys.”
Porter County Sheriff’s Department Sgt. Larry LaFlower said crime in January was down 50 percent from January 2013 in all major crime categories.
Gary’s chief quoted in the Northwest Indiana Times as saying Mother Nature did what 246 police officers could not do– and that’s slow down crime.
Read more: wgntv.com...
NavyDoc
demongoat
NavyDoc
That's really the whole point of the deterrent effect of CCW. Criminals do not know who or when their potential victim might be armed. Even though the law wasn't really in effect, the THOUGHT they might see more CCW and this was a possible deterrent.
there is really no proof of that, crime in general has been dropping since 1992, and this has nothing to do with guns.
i believe crime has gone down due to the public's ability to assist law enforcement in capturing criminals through the internet and tv. more people are aware they can get their 15 minutes of fame by turning someone in for committing a crime.
no, this has to do with the growing risks to committing crime with all the camera phones and other systems around making it a challenge to break the law.
I disagree. Why worry about getting caught on camera if you are unlikely to receive much of a punishment? Our judicial system is really a joke for the most part.
NavyDoc
Antigod
NavyDoc
xuenchen
mugger
While it is good news that these citizens can finally exercise their 2nd amendment rights, the article is a bit misleading.
The first concealed carry permits were issued in late February, so the decrease in crime can’t yet be attributed to more people carrying guns. I'm sure in time, we will have a better record of how this pans out.
www.theblaze.com...
It was the mass fear and panic by the petty criminals.
They're dumb, but they knew what was going to happen, and they were also scared some people might take things into their own hands ahead of time.
I know this. I live here.
And a very good friend of mine is a Chicago Cop.
The police saw a difference right away.
And of course, many criminals didn't actually know when the CCW law was going into effect.
Rumors were all around that it was immediate.
Like I said, the petty criminals aren't that smart. They don't pay attention to laws anyway.
That's really the whole point of the deterrent effect of CCW. Criminals do not know who or when their potential victim might be armed. Even though the law wasn't really in effect, the THOUGHT they might see more CCW and this was a possible deterrent.
A lot of countries that have guns, don't allow hand guns. The UK is a prime example.
Handguns are great for crime, long guns (like rifles and shotguns) are hard to hide down the back of your pants when you want to rob a liquor store. Switzerland's guns are mainly rifles. I suspect when you find countries with guns but not so much gun crime it will be because they have mainly rifles and shotguns.
You the Swiss can buy handguns and even full auto and keep them in their homes as can the Czechs--who can even CCW like in the US with a permit. I think that you find that in Europe, rate of crime has more to do with societal factors--homogenous populations, low poverty rates, higher education, etc. than who can legally own what gun type.
Antigod
NavyDoc
Antigod
NavyDoc
xuenchen
mugger
While it is good news that these citizens can finally exercise their 2nd amendment rights, the article is a bit misleading.
The first concealed carry permits were issued in late February, so the decrease in crime can’t yet be attributed to more people carrying guns. I'm sure in time, we will have a better record of how this pans out.
www.theblaze.com...
It was the mass fear and panic by the petty criminals.
They're dumb, but they knew what was going to happen, and they were also scared some people might take things into their own hands ahead of time.
I know this. I live here.
And a very good friend of mine is a Chicago Cop.
The police saw a difference right away.
And of course, many criminals didn't actually know when the CCW law was going into effect.
Rumors were all around that it was immediate.
Like I said, the petty criminals aren't that smart. They don't pay attention to laws anyway.
That's really the whole point of the deterrent effect of CCW. Criminals do not know who or when their potential victim might be armed. Even though the law wasn't really in effect, the THOUGHT they might see more CCW and this was a possible deterrent.
A lot of countries that have guns, don't allow hand guns. The UK is a prime example.
Handguns are great for crime, long guns (like rifles and shotguns) are hard to hide down the back of your pants when you want to rob a liquor store. Switzerland's guns are mainly rifles. I suspect when you find countries with guns but not so much gun crime it will be because they have mainly rifles and shotguns.
You the Swiss can buy handguns and even full auto and keep them in their homes as can the Czechs--who can even CCW like in the US with a permit. I think that you find that in Europe, rate of crime has more to do with societal factors--homogenous populations, low poverty rates, higher education, etc. than who can legally own what gun type.
The Swiss aren't allowed to have ammunition at home.
Still, there are more domestic homicides and suicides with a firearm in Switzerland than pretty much anywhere else in Europe except Finland. So much for guns not causing deaths.
The Czechs have exams and stringent criminal record checks, and secure storage. Still, czech firearms deaths are massively higher on a pc basis than the UK (1.76 vs 0.25). That's seven times higher.
Hmm, the Czechs are a mainly white group, so this is probably a baseline for white only gun deaths with fairly open access to guns. In the UK, as in America, most of our gun deaths are 'ethnic'. I wonder what the gun homicide rate is for black Americans vs white or Asian.
Most types of ammunition are available for commercial sale, including full metal jacket bullet calibres for military-issue weapons; hollow point rounds are only permitted for hunters. Ammunition sales are registered only at the point of sale by recording the buyer's name in a bound book.
Antigod
NavyDoc
demongoat
NavyDoc
That's really the whole point of the deterrent effect of CCW. Criminals do not know who or when their potential victim might be armed. Even though the law wasn't really in effect, the THOUGHT they might see more CCW and this was a possible deterrent.
there is really no proof of that, crime in general has been dropping since 1992, and this has nothing to do with guns.
i believe crime has gone down due to the public's ability to assist law enforcement in capturing criminals through the internet and tv. more people are aware they can get their 15 minutes of fame by turning someone in for committing a crime.
no, this has to do with the growing risks to committing crime with all the camera phones and other systems around making it a challenge to break the law.
I disagree. Why worry about getting caught on camera if you are unlikely to receive much of a punishment? Our judicial system is really a joke for the most part.
www.britsoccrim.org/volume7/007.pdf www.britsoccrim.org/volume7/007.pdf
You want the first paragraph and the diagram showing convictions by age group. Young men commit most crime. The crime rate has fallen because the average age of the population has gone up, and young men make up a smaller percentage, The rate of offending in the youth group, at least in the UK, is the same as it's always been, with MORE violence now than in the past few decades, slightly less economic..
He didn't actually say that. He said nothing about gun owners being the cause of increased crime.
I love the cognitive dissonance with anti self defense people. If crime is up, it must be cause of gun ownership unless there already are gun bans in place in which case it must because of something else.
Phage
reply to post by NavyDoc
He didn't actually say that. He said nothing about gun owners being the cause of increased crime.
I love the cognitive dissonance with anti self defense people. If crime is up, it must be cause of gun ownership unless there already are gun bans in place in which case it must because of something else.
Phage
reply to post by NavyDoc
I disagree. Nothing was said about increasing crime.
The implication is that a decrease in crime is not necessarily related to gun ownership. The statistics for Chicago support this position. Both homicides and hand gun related crime declined before the law was passed. Before anyone could legally carry a concealed weapon.
www.abovetopsecret.com...
edit on 4/8/2014 by Phage because: (no reason given)