It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
seagull
reply to post by interupt42
It's hard to use a drone missile if you don't know where the rebels are. They're not going to be in plain sight. Camouflage does work. I don't pretend to be an expert, 'cause I'm not... But spoofing drones with a little thought has to be possible.
xuenchen
mugger
While it is good news that these citizens can finally exercise their 2nd amendment rights, the article is a bit misleading.
The first concealed carry permits were issued in late February, so the decrease in crime can’t yet be attributed to more people carrying guns. I'm sure in time, we will have a better record of how this pans out.
www.theblaze.com...
It was the mass fear and panic by the petty criminals.
They're dumb, but they knew what was going to happen, and they were also scared some people might take things into their own hands ahead of time.
I know this. I live here.
And a very good friend of mine is a Chicago Cop.
The police saw a difference right away.
And of course, many criminals didn't actually know when the CCW law was going into effect.
Rumors were all around that it was immediate.
Like I said, the petty criminals aren't that smart. They don't pay attention to laws anyway.
interupt42
seagull
reply to post by interupt42
It's hard to use a drone missile if you don't know where the rebels are. They're not going to be in plain sight. Camouflage does work. I don't pretend to be an expert, 'cause I'm not... But spoofing drones with a little thought has to be possible.
The drone was just an example. If the bat crazy level reached Defcon 1 and wanted us gone their technology is so superior and heavy that they don't even have to be accurate. They have the capability to destroy cities one at a time all from remote locations.
Sending in troops is more for political and civilian causalities but in the SHTF scenario and the gloves come off you are not going to be seeing what is coming at you.
Our civilian weapons might have been a deterrent or nuance at one time (Possibly prior to WW1) but definitely not in the past few decades.
Like I said I'm for gun ownership but IMO its just silly to hear "take back our gov't" as a legit argument to keep our guns.
1. If our gov't doesn't hesitate to overtake countries with superior technology and millataries why would they have any fear of our guns?
2. What effect is a gun going to have against nuclear, biological chemical warfare, or remote controlled killing machines that are miles and miles away?
The gap in technological advances between civilian and millatary weapons are far to great to be overcome by experience.
Idiosonic
reply to post by xavi1000
Same here in Australia. Seems only 1st world countries with a "right" to carry guns have a problem with them
voidla
reply to post by Grimpachi
Really weird you'd choose corrupt countries with bad governments, civil wars and poverty.
Kidding. It's not weird at all.
Here's the numbers for countries in Europe. Places with gun bans for the general population. (Farmers/hunters/special police excluded Of course they all require serious background check. But you're probably against regulation as well..)
Some countries listed below have gun laws open for the general population.
Europe -
Belarus 4.9 (0.1 specifically for guns www.gunpolicy.org/firearms/region/belarus0
Bulgaria 2.0
Czech Republic 1.7
Hungary 1.3
Poland 1.1
Republic of Moldova 1.0
Romania 2.0
Russian Federation 10.2 (Allows guns to 18+)
Slovakia 1.5
Ukraine 5.2
Denmark 0.9
Estonia 2.5
Finland 2.2
Greenland 19.2 (Wow! Except we see these numbers are out of 100,000 and Greenland has only 56,000 people. 11 deaths in '09 gives us 19.2.)
Iceland 0.3
Ireland 1.2
Latvia 3.1
Lithuania 6.6
Norway 0.6
UK & NI 1.2 (0.23 for guns specifically www.gunpolicy.org/firearms/region/united-kingdom)
Albania 4.4 (Guns aren't being regulated properly )
Bosnia & Herzegovina 1.5
Croatia 1.4
Greece 1.5
Italy 0.9
Malta 1.0
Montenegro 3.5
Portugal 1.2
Serbia 1.2
Slovenia 0.7
Spain 0.8
Macedonia 1.9
Austria 0.6
Belgium 1.7
France 1.1
Germany 0.8
Liechtenstein 2.8
Luxembourg 2.5
Monaco 0.0 (as of 2009)
Netherlands 1.1
Switzerland 0.7 - LOOK! SWITZERLAND! IT'S ON THE LIST! At 0.7! With strict gun regulation! Did you even read the report you're source is sourcing from? Or did you just copy paste?
Australia 1.0
New Zealand 0.9
China 1.0
Taiwan 3.2
Japan 0.4
I've used the source you did. I just didn't ignore the stable countries.
These numbers relate to "Intentional homicide, count and rate per 100,00 population (1995 - 2011).
I'm sure if you give me time I can find exact gun rates for the UK.
www.unodc.org... - Actual source. Not a Blogger.edit on 5-4-2014 by voidla because: (no reason given)edit on 5-4-2014 by voidla because: (no reason given)edit on 5-4-2014 by voidla because: (no reason given)edit on 5-4-2014 by voidla because: (no reason given)
Bob Sholtz
i truly yearn for the day that guns and weapons will not be necessary for safety...that being said, those concealed guns are saving lives.
even more lives could be saved if ads were placed showing how much crime has been deterred since the new concealed carry laws.
NavyDoc
xuenchen
mugger
While it is good news that these citizens can finally exercise their 2nd amendment rights, the article is a bit misleading.
The first concealed carry permits were issued in late February, so the decrease in crime can’t yet be attributed to more people carrying guns. I'm sure in time, we will have a better record of how this pans out.
www.theblaze.com...
It was the mass fear and panic by the petty criminals.
They're dumb, but they knew what was going to happen, and they were also scared some people might take things into their own hands ahead of time.
I know this. I live here.
And a very good friend of mine is a Chicago Cop.
The police saw a difference right away.
And of course, many criminals didn't actually know when the CCW law was going into effect.
Rumors were all around that it was immediate.
Like I said, the petty criminals aren't that smart. They don't pay attention to laws anyway.
That's really the whole point of the deterrent effect of CCW. Criminals do not know who or when their potential victim might be armed. Even though the law wasn't really in effect, the THOUGHT they might see more CCW and this was a possible deterrent.
NavyDoc
That's really the whole point of the deterrent effect of CCW. Criminals do not know who or when their potential victim might be armed. Even though the law wasn't really in effect, the THOUGHT they might see more CCW and this was a possible deterrent.
demongoat
NavyDoc
That's really the whole point of the deterrent effect of CCW. Criminals do not know who or when their potential victim might be armed. Even though the law wasn't really in effect, the THOUGHT they might see more CCW and this was a possible deterrent.
there is really no proof of that, crime in general has been dropping since 1992, and this has nothing to do with guns.
i believe crime has gone down due to the public's ability to assist law enforcement in capturing criminals through the internet and tv. more people are aware they can get their 15 minutes of fame by turning someone in for committing a crime.
no, this has to do with the growing risks to committing crime with all the camera phones and other systems around making it a challenge to break the law.
Xtrozero
BTW when Russia steamrolls Europe like Germany did, I would bet they wished they had guns.... Oh I forgot, that could never happen today...my bad.
Civilian Possession
Estimates of the number of guns in private hands range from 2.2 to 6.3 million. These suggest a median rate of 6.6 firearms per 100 people, although the higher figure would yield a rate of 13 per 100. In 2005, Ukraine ranked 84th in the world for the number of civilian firearms per capita.
"The majority of the gunfire seemed to be coming from police lines," said BBC's Gabriel Gatehouse. "But not all of it." Gatehouse said he saw one of the shooters "wearing one of the protesters' green helmets," and shooting from an open window in Hotel Ukraine.
xavi1000
reply to post by Xtrozero
I dont mean to argue, member above stated that US or he need to educate rest of the World about guns.I'm in Europe (part of the rest of the World) and we dont need guns and we are doing fine.edit on 4-4-2014 by xavi1000 because: (no reason given)
interupt42
What use are your weapons going to be or who are you going to shoot at when you are being attacked from above via drones, satellite guided missiles, biological agents, or even nuclear bombs?
I'm for gun ownership but I realize Rambo and Red Dawn where just movies. Our weapons today are to protect a civilian from other civilian criminals.
Phage
reply to post by LadyGreenEyes
The shootings being down ought to send a very large hint to the anti0gun crowd
But, the decrease occurred before anybody had a permit. Is the hint that something else was responsible?
DodgyDawg
The fact as stated before is that nobody wanted to fire on the Russians and therefore your point that an armed society would help stop an invasion is invalid.
A deterent before the law was passed? Before there was any chance of legally carrying a concealed weapon?
The press about the CCW's would have a deterrent effect if not just in the imagination of the criminals.