It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Historic Breaking News: Canada, Vatican & Crown GUILTY of Genocide

page: 18
55
<< 15  16  17    19  20  21 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 15 2014 @ 12:08 PM
link   
reply to post by adjensen
 


Some "First Nations people" are clearly not what they claim to be.

Reminds me of some "religions" which are ALSO clearly not what they claim to be.

The easiest way to bring down a house is to discredit it from within.

APTN was FORMERLY called "Television Northern Canada"...

I think the logo clearly gives away the hidden agenda behind the 'Aboriginal Peoples' facade:



The all-seeing eye is the elite's favorite symbol. It represents the eye of Lucifer seeing all and is usually atop a pyramid, the symbol for a top-down command and control system of compartmentalization. answers.yahoo.com...

Primary defendants WELBY, BERGOGLIO and PACHON all conspired to set into motion a campaign to conceal or destroy this evidence, obstruct justice, and publicly discredit the ITCCS and Kevin Annett after this evidence was made public in October, 2011. This misinformation campaign continues primarily by means of government-controlled media in Canada, including the misnamed “Aboriginal Peoples’ Television Network” (APTN), and by directly silencing Mohawk elders and eyewitnesses in Brantford.

iclcj.com...

It is definitely satanic. It is an occult symbol, that is why you see it clearly on the American dollar bill, supposedly the Great America Seal. America was established by secret societies of various orders, mostly Masonic.

The eye in the top of the triangle is commonly referred to as “the all seeing eye of God’s wisdom,” and the light which streams out from the triangle, supposedly, represents the light of God’s wisdom. However, the god they are referring to is “Lucifer”. This eye is also known to many as the “Third eye,” which is seen on the forehead of many pagan Hindu women. To the Hindu it represents the pagan sign of “Cain”. This “eye” is also symbolic for the god of “Baal”, (the god of “Jupiter”), the “solar eye”.

Sometimes this third eye is called the “Eye of God’s Wisdom”, a Masonic symbol, or represents “big brother is watching”. The “eye” sometimes represents “The Great Architect of the Universe”, “The Grand Geometrician of the Universe”, “God”, or “Yod”. The triangle it is enclosed in is a mystery symbol for wisdom, strength and beauty, (the trinity) sometimes also called the “house of Rothchild”. This eye in the capstone of the pyramid is familiar to all Masons, Illuminati and Rosicrucians, for they use it in their lodges as a great secret symbol. The well known Pope of Masonry, Albert Pike openly admitted that the Mason’s god was Lucifer.

Source(s):
messianicgentiles.blogspot.com...
yahswatchman.webs.com...
sg.answers.yahoo.com...





edit on Apr000000Tue, 15 Apr 2014 12:27:46 -050012pm30Tue, 15 Apr 2014 12:27:46 -050020142715 by Murgatroid because: I felt like it..




posted on Apr, 15 2014 @ 12:10 PM
link   
reply to post by adjensen
 


I fast forwared the video to the part where they started talking about Annett.

Did you watch the documentary, Unrepentant, yet?

Until you address that, your opinion of Annett is worthless.

And yes, there are Indians who are part of the perpetual problems, still plaguing the Native Americans today. If you don't think that there is corruption among the Indian nations, just take a look at the casino culture!



posted on Apr, 15 2014 @ 12:24 PM
link   
reply to post by windword
 



And yes, there are Indians who are part of the perpetual problems, still plaguing the Native Americans today.

I have seen racism such as this many times in the past, when I lived in North Dakota -- "enlightened" white people, racked with liberal guilt, who see themselves as protectors of Native peoples, whom they deem unable to see how they are being abused. I've seen it to the point where Native Americans were actually denied the right to vote on certain issues, because their "liberal protectors" said that they were incapable of making decisions for themselves.

And that didn't happen a hundred years ago, it was within the last decade.

The documentary shows that the bones that Annett was trotting around Occupy Toronto were identified as animal bones by an archaeologist, and that the area where he dug them up, at the direction of a psychic that he'd brought to the site to show him where to dig, was a drainage ditch coming off from a butcher shop. This isn't some "naive Indians with an axe to grind insulting their saviour", this is clear evidence that your hero is a liar and a lunatic.

But you keep up your crusade.



posted on Apr, 15 2014 @ 12:29 PM
link   
reply to post by adjensen
 


Annett doesn't trot out any bones in the movie. Are you saying that there are no missing / unmarked graves?

Again, if you don't watch the documentary, your opinion of it is worthless.




edit on 15-4-2014 by windword because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 15 2014 @ 02:33 PM
link   
reply to post by windword
 



Again, if you don't watch the documentary, your opinion of it is worthless.

Then I guess that your opinion of the First Nations peoples' investigation Annett is, similarly, worthless.

It has been proven that Annett dug up animal bones at the direction of a psychic, and then lied about it, saying that the bones were "from a mass grave" that Ground Penetrating Radar had discovered.

You asked what was false in his documentary, and I said his claim that 50,000 children were killed was, and provided evidence for that, and yet I'm the one who's wrong, because I won't take the word, with no evidence, of a lunatic. He's actually gone so far as to say that 50,000 to 100,000 were killed -- 2/3 of the children in those schools were killed, and yet there are no mass graves, no testimony that "66% of my classmates were murdered", nothing whatsoever.

But you believe him, because you'd rather believe a white liberal agitator with no evidence, rather than First Nations people with evidence.



posted on Apr, 15 2014 @ 02:58 PM
link   
reply to post by adjensen
 





It has been proven that Annett dug up animal bones at the direction of a psychic, and then lied about it, saying that the bones were "from a mass grave" that Ground Penetrating Radar had discovered.

You asked what was false in his documentary, and I said his claim that 50,000 children were killed was, and provided evidence for that, and yet I'm the one who's wrong, because I won't take the word, with no evidence, of a lunatic. He's actually gone so far as to say that 50,000 to 100,000 were killed -- 2/3 of the children in those schools were killed, and yet there are no mass graves, no testimony that "66% of my classmates were murdered", nothing whatsoever.



Obviously you haven't watched the documentary. Annett makes no claim of 50,000 children killed, the Indians do. There is no digging up bones or claims of mass graves. Watch the documentary!

I don't know why you continue to make this about Annett and the numbers. It seems to me that you're just rampantly defending the Church, denying their culpability and discrediting their accuser. They do stand accused!

If you refuse to watch the documentary, your opinion is worthless. I don't care about your smear campaign against Annett. The damage done by the Church can't be repaired. And certainly won't be repaired by assassinating Kevin Annett's character.



posted on Apr, 15 2014 @ 03:07 PM
link   
reply to post by windword
 



Annett makes no claim of 50,000 children killed, the Indians do.

Annett was saying that long before any film was made -- so you're pretty much admitting that he put words into those peoples' mouths.


“At least 50,000 aboriginal children died in the residential schools between 1896 and 1973, according to the government’s own documented mortality rates …” – First press release of Kevin Annett announcing the publication of his book “Hidden from History: The Canadian Holocaust” on February 1, 2000 (Source)

Again, white guy with no evidence? Or First Nations people with evidence?

Do you have any legitimate reason for going with the white guy?



posted on Apr, 15 2014 @ 03:18 PM
link   
reply to post by adjensen
 


All I know of Annett I learned in the video documentary. I saw the smear campaign against him, accusing him of being COINTELPRO, threatening and using mind control and coersion tactics, exactly the same thing that the church and the government did to Annett. I don't believe them for a minute. They have more to loose than Annett ever lost.

I watched the documentary and that's where my opinion was formed. I have nothing for or against Kevin Annett other than I respect the work that he's done. How many rabbit holes he went down to get where he got, I don't know.

If you refuse to watch the documentary, there's no use discussing anything else with you, because my opinion was formed through the information provided in the documentary. You can't discuss that.... So...........



posted on Apr, 15 2014 @ 03:44 PM
link   
reply to post by windword
 



I saw the smear campaign against him, accusing him of being COINTELPRO, threatening and using mind control and coersion tactics

When on earth did I ever claim that? Cite the post, please.

What I've said is that Annett is a documented liar and grandstanding conman who takes advantage of people for his own gain. The title of this thread is not "Kevin Annett's Documentary", it is 'Historic Breaking News blah blah blah", and evidence to the end that no one was found guilty by anyone with any legitimate authority is extremely relevant to the topic, as is the credibility of Annett, the sole source of testimony that anyone was convicted of anything.

Kevin Annett claims that 50,000 to 100,000 children were murdered in Indian Residential Schools, but has provided no evidence whatsoever for this (by not bothering to watch the APTN video, you missed what his basis for that number is, which the investigator proved was invalid,) and yet you not only hide your face from any contrary evidence, but you praise him for what he's done for First Nations people, though if you actually listened to them, they're pretty much all saying that he betrayed them for his own celebrity.

You've consistently shown that you are not interested in the truth, you are not interested in the evidence provided by the First Nations people, and you are not interested in any bad mouthing of your hero, Kevin Annett, regardless of who is critical of him, and why.



posted on Apr, 15 2014 @ 03:53 PM
link   
reply to post by adjensen
 


Your mouth isn't the only one behind the bullhorn of slander. There's clearly a smear campaign making outrageous claims against Annett. I'm not going to provide you with links though.

I refuse to take part in the assassination of Kevin Annetts character or in the dismissal the crimes that the church and the government have been accused of. Again, if you can't discuss the content of the documentary, you and I have nothing more to discuss.



posted on Apr, 15 2014 @ 04:17 PM
link   
reply to post by adjensen
 



adjensen
You've consistently shown that you are not interested in the truth...

adjensen
I don't watch videos that are posted here. Never have, never will...

Seems just about as legit as these two guys:




adjensen
Kevin Annett claims that 50,000 to 100,000 children were murdered in Indian Residential Schools, but has provided no evidence whatsoever ...

Woops there it is...


UNREPENTANT - CANADA'S GENOCIDE
WINNER: BEST INTERNATIONAL DOCUMENTARY - 2006 LOS ANGELES INDEPENDENT FILM FESTIVAL. **WINNER: BEST DIRECTOR for an INTERNATIONAL DOCUMENTARY - 2006 NEW YORK INTERNATIONAL FILM FESTIVAL.


EDIT: No offense intended but I'll be danged if this isn't one of THE best arguments for religion being used as a mind control weapon that I have EVER seen...



edit on Apr000000Tue, 15 Apr 2014 16:41:09 -05004pm30Tue, 15 Apr 2014 16:41:09 -050020144115 by Murgatroid because: I felt like it..



posted on Apr, 15 2014 @ 05:06 PM
link   

hellobruce

windword
With the film recently garnering a Best Director Award at the 2006 New York Independent Film and Video Festival, and winning the award for Best International Documentary at the 2006 Los Angeles Independent Film Festival,


Again, how about showing us the results from the film festival website - as it looks like it did not win according to the LA film festival website from the link already posted here....


Very interesting. IMDB shows a different winner in that category as well.

www.imdb.com...



posted on Apr, 15 2014 @ 05:32 PM
link   
reply to post by windword
 



There's clearly a smear campaign making outrageous claims against Annett.

It's funny that those behind your imagined "smear campaign" are people who Annett still claims to represent, and, while they have proof of his lying and fabrication of evidence, the response in support of him is blind devotion, such as you display, or moronic claims of Freemason and Illuminati conspiracy that a third grader would laugh at.

I believe that Lydia White Calf is featured in your precious documentary.


Lydia White Calf is the wife of a residential school survivor who put a lot of her time and energy into supporting Kevin Annett. She has given him 10′s of thousands of dollars to fund his personal expenses, travel expenses and the printing of his self-published books. Over time, Lydia realized that Kevin was not behaving in a way she would expect of a ‘reverend’ who said he was working on the survivor’s behalf. When she spoke out, he labelled her as a ‘black ops’ operative- does that sound familiar? (Source)

There ya go. "Smear campaign" by one of the people in your video, and as I understand it, she's not the only one.


Again, if you can't discuss the content of the documentary, you and I have nothing more to discuss.

The subject of this thread is not Kevin Annett's documentary.

It is the supposed trial of the Canadian government and the credibility of the source of that "Historic Breaking News", Kevin Annett. Unless you have evidence that a legitimate court held a legitimate trial, and an impartial judge or jury found Stephen Harper, Queen Elizabeth and Pope Francis guilty of crimes against humanity, you're as baseless as Annett and his foolish show trials.



posted on Apr, 15 2014 @ 05:42 PM
link   
reply to post by Murgatroid
 



Woops there it is...

I'm going to assume, probably incorrectly, that you're not as clueless as the content that you typically post.

That video is not "evidence" of 50,000 Canadian children murdered. Annett has not produced any evidence to support anywhere near that number.

Here is where he came up with that number -- he took Bryce's study from the early 1900s, used the percentage death rate at ONE school for ONE year, and extrapolated it to 100 schools over 100 years. Now, is that reasonable? Of course not -- there were never 100 Indian Residential Schools in the first place, and 100 years would mean that thousands were still dying each year into the 1970s (actually, it would have been tens of thousands each year, because almost all of the schools were closed at that point.)

So, in 1975, for example, where is the evidence of an Indian Residential School that had tens of thousands of students, all of whom died?

That is the "evidence" that you think you're pointing out.

But you didn't know that, because you didn't bother to look at what Annett was saying and what his basis was. You were content to take someone's lies, and pass them off as the truth, because you think it somehow furthers your cause.



posted on Apr, 15 2014 @ 05:55 PM
link   
reply to post by Harvin
 


Very interesting. IMDB shows a different winner in that category as well.

Well, here's one mystery solved -- it didn't win the award at a legitimate festival, it won it at the New York International Independent Film and Video Festival, which is a "pay to enter" film festival (read: vanity awards -- there are probably dozens, if not hundreds, of "winners").


(Louie Lawless) was nominated for an Academy Award for Best Documentary Feature in 1973 for his work on Manson and he won the Best Director award for a documentary at the 2006 New York International Independent Film and Video Festival for his film Unrepentant. (Source)

Never mind that an award for "Best Director" is independent of the film's content -- it didn't win "Best Picture" or "Best Documentary". I guess that Lawless could only afford the $300 for his own kudos, lol.


edit on 15-4-2014 by adjensen because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 15 2014 @ 06:30 PM
link   
reply to post by adjensen
 


First of all Lydia White Calf didn't write that snippet, and nothing from your source invalidates Lydia White Calf's testimony in the documentary, which you refuse to watch.

Nothing you have posted has invalidated the information contain in the documentary, Unrepentant. Kevin Annett brought these horrors out of the dark, hidden corners of the church, and their government collusion, and revealed an ongoing agenda for public scrutiny. If you were any kind of a Christian at all, you would realize that government courts can't right the wrongs committed by obviously unchristian people pretending to be Christ's representatives on Earth, and wouldn't be looking at their rulings as righteous.



posted on Apr, 15 2014 @ 06:34 PM
link   
reply to post by adjensen
 





Well, here's one mystery solved -- it didn't win the award at a legitimate festival, it won it at the New York International Independent Film and Video Festival,


So, now do you admit that claiming the award isn't a lie? What is a "legitimate" film festival? I used to sit on the board of a film festival committee in Hawaii. I'll bet you never heard of it/them either.

Your attempt at character assassination to protect you kiddy fiddling priests is getting old!



posted on Apr, 15 2014 @ 06:55 PM
link   
reply to post by windword
 


First of all Lydia White Calf didn't write that snippet, and nothing from your source invalidates Lydia White Calf's testimony in the documentary, which you refuse to watch.

You continue to labour under the misunderstanding that this thread is about your precious documentary, when it is actually about the claims made in the OP and the credibility of Kevin Annett, who is the source of those claims. Lydia White Calf's denouncing of Annett, and his subsequent denouncement of her as a "black ops agent" speaks to that credibility -- if Annett didn't know that she was an unreliable witness when he included her testimony, why would you have faith in anyone else that he puts forth as a witness?

Here's another one of Annett's "Black Ops Operators", sure looks pretty scary, doesn't she?


Kevin Annett brought these horrors out of the dark, hidden corners of the church, and their government collusion, and revealed an ongoing agenda for public scrutiny.

Get real.

You're apparently unfamiliar with Dr. Peter Bryce, whom I have cited throughout this thread, and who published The Story of a National Crime: Being a Record of the Health Conditions of the Indians of Canada from 1904 to 1921 in 1922, which caused a national scandal and resulted in better conditions in the Residential Schools.

You're also apparently unfamiliar with the 1998 Statement of Reconciliation, which led to the establishment of the Aboriginal Healing Foundation.

You're also apparently unfamiliar with the 2003 establishment of the Alternative Dispute Resolution process, part of the Indian Residential Schools Settlement Agreement, which resulted in a final settlement of $1.9 billion dollars to former students, 98% of eligible students having received payment.

All of that preceded your precious documentary.


If you were any kind of a Christian at all

lol, you've stooped that low? What would you know about what a Christian should do?

Hint: it's involved with discernment of truth, not the propagation of BS from documented conmen.



posted on Apr, 15 2014 @ 07:05 PM
link   
reply to post by windword
 



So, now do you admit that claiming the award isn't a lie?

When did I say it was a lie? I've seen evidence that it won the New York award -- it's on Lawless' wikipedia page. I haven't seen any evidence that it won the Los Angeles award, because it's not listed on their web site, but that might be due to confusion in various festivals, as was the case in the New York case.


What is a "legitimate" film festival?



A publicist with recent experience at last Fall's event, however, felt sorry for the filmmakers who went to the NYIIFVF, without knowing what a "real festival" is like. "(NYIIFVF is) taking a lot of money from people who really don't have any," the publicist said. "It's a shame."

Jojoe Spaid, fresh from last month's January NYIIFVF, recently contacted indieWIRE with some concerns about the festival. Spaid, like Lyman, received a last minute call from Zoblotsky. "I was shocked by the hard sell," says Spaid. "Adam gave me a spiel about how I was a late entry, but I could still get the film in if I could pay him over the telephone. I did a really scary thing. I gave him my checking account number."

"Unfortunately, this festival serves a niche; it's a bottom feeder's festival," continues Spaid. "You need to know what you're getting into. And Adam and Stuart are not going to tell you. It's like a campaign of disinformation until you show up." However, Spaid explains, "If you can't get it screened anywhere else, okay -- 300 bucks and a lot of disorganization, and you have to be in charge of your film in riding Stuart and Adam, because they're probably going to shaft you when you're not looking." (Source)

Does that sound legit to you?

Oh, wait, never mind, of course it does.



posted on Apr, 15 2014 @ 07:48 PM
link   
reply to post by Harvin
 


Harvin
Very interesting. IMDB shows a different winner in that category as well.

How does that saying go about birds and feathers?

IMDB is now owned by Jeff Bezos of Amazon who is doing huge business with the CIA.

Bezos in bed with CIA




top topics



 
55
<< 15  16  17    19  20  21 >>

log in

join