It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Historic Breaking News: Canada, Vatican & Crown GUILTY of Genocide

page: 19
55
<< 16  17  18    20  21  22 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 15 2014 @ 07:53 PM
link   
reply to post by adjensen
 


I don't find your sources to be credible.

This thread is NOT about Annett, it's about the subsequent fallout of his work. If you watched the documentary, you would understand the Christian philosophy around his invented court.

This thread is about the mistreatment and genocide of the Native American People, (First Nation) not about your wild waving and distractions from the issues of the abuse that was purposely perpetrated by the Church with the sanction of the Crown and the Canadian government.

If you were a true Christian, (Yeah that's right!) and not just a shill for the Catholic Church, you wouldn't spend so much time and energy defending them and deflecting from their abuses, arguing the numbers and assassinating the character of those whom you oppose. Good Christians don't try to cover up the abuses their churches commit. We know them by their fruits.




posted on Apr, 15 2014 @ 08:09 PM
link   
reply to post by windword
 



I don't find your sources to be credible.

Fine. Present your evidence that 50,000 Canadian children were murdered.

I am listening to your precious documentary now, and all I've seen thus far is eyewitness testimony to mistreatment of individuals, which no one has ever said did not happen. I've heard no actual evidence of mass murders.

At twenty minutes, there is a blatant falsehood, when Annett claims that he was "fired without cause."

Here's what the United Church of Canada had to say about his departure:


Mr. Annett claims that he was fired by the United Church for raising the residential school issue (his film, book, website). In fact, Mr. Annett resigned his position as minister of St. Andrew's United Church in Alberni, British Columbia, in writing when faced with questions about his competence for ministry. Mr. Annett's de-listing as a United Church minister was the result of two Formal Hearings conducted according to the rules of evidence of the Province of British Columbia. The report of the Formal Hearing is found on the British Columbia Conference website . For more than a decade, Mr. Annett has repeatedly made disparaging public statements which verge on defamation about a number of the United Church officials and members who were involved in the process that led to his name being placed on the church's discontinued service list. (Source)

That says that he wasn't fired, but rather that he resigned, and then was de-listed as a minister when he refused to participate in the proceedings on his competence as a minister, which is in accordance with the transcripts of those hearings, which I posted earlier.

It is also in accordance with Annett's own claim, from his "Chronology of attacks on Kevin Annett" page:


January 8, 1995: Kevin offers his resignation to the St. Andrew's church Board, via Fred Bishop, out of concern for his childrens' safety and because of his need to apply soon for another church posting. Kevin asks Board to allow him to work until June 30, 1995. Bishop accepts resignation "with deep regret" and asks board to accept Kevin's request to work until June 30. Board agrees. (Source)

He wasn't "fired without cause", he quit. The "firing" was the UCC declaration that he was unfit to be a minister, which he clearly was.



posted on Apr, 15 2014 @ 08:16 PM
link   
Oh, and I'll add that, while it may be due to the quality of the YouTube video that Murgatroid posted, but anyone who watches this thing and thinks that it's deserving of any award doesn't know much about filmmaking. The sound levels are horribly mixed, and the overall feel is that of a university student film.

I can understand the outrage that some people who have, because they're not familiar with this subject, but as a film, it's pretty poorly done. Even compared to a History Channel documentary, it's pretty amateur.

Windword, I'm gonna be sending you a bill for two hours of my time when this is over, lol.


edit on 15-4-2014 by adjensen because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 15 2014 @ 08:17 PM
link   
reply to post by adjensen
 


Your source (Greg Renouf) has JUST as much credibility as the "Seems Legit" body builder I posted earlier...

Why should anyone be surprised by that?

CSIS OPERATIVE GREG RENOUF

This Man Is Dangerous: Greg Renouf


The undersigned members of Occupy Vancouver would like to condemn and express our outrage at the actions of an individual who has been representing himself as an official voice of our movement, all the while committing persistent acts of bullying and harassment. Bullying and harassment are forms of active violence that should not be tolerated within our movement. As stated in our basis of unity: “We are also committed to safeguarding our collective well-being – including safety from interpersonal violence.”

Greg Renouf has repeatedly been asked by a wide range of individuals (including respected community activists, lawyers, and journalists) to stop his abusive campaign of harassment against Harsha Walia, a long-time organizer and activist. Yet Renouf presents his personal attacks and persistent harassment of her as “questioning”, and our attempts to explain to him that his behaviour is abusive and bordering on stalking have been ignored. Renouf continues to make unreasonable public demands of her (and only her), writes dozens of daily slanderous and inaccurate posts about her, has attempted to “report” her and others to the Vancouver Police Department and RCMP, viciously attacks anyone who tries to hold him accountable, and is creating an unnecessary climate of division and fear-mongering.

Anti-Harassment Statement by Members of OccupyVancouver

URGENT BULLETIN: CBC NEWS IS NOW USING CSIS OPERATIVE GREG RENOUF AS ITS "OCCUPY SPOKESPERSON" IN A CBC TV DOCUMENTARY ON THE OCCUPY MOVEMENT IN CANADA.

Renouf was banned because of the same thing Renouf is doing to Rev. Kevin Annett and personnel and supporters of the ITCCS
exopolitics.blogs.com...

Mas sive misinformation and smears aimed at Kevin Annett are flooding the internet since last month, designed to confuse, divide and disarm our supporters and funders. These new attacks are instigated by a known distruptor-operative using the name "Greg Renouf". This individual, who has been named publicly as being an informant for Canada's CSIS, has acted on information - such as Kevin's planned radio appearances - that can only have been gained through access to Kevin's personal emails and files using surveillance methods employed by the state.

Coinciding with this heightened bad jacketing by "Renouf" was a sophisticated entrapment aimed at Kevin in the form of an apparent lawsuit in Canada's Federal Court. This suit was begun by a man of unconfirmed identity named Jason Bowman who delayed and obstructed the proper filing of the same lawsuit. We suspect that this entrapment had a dual purpose: to discredit Kevin and the ITCCS, who were named as co-plaintiffs, by mishandling and bringing disrepute to the lawsuit, and to embroil Kevin in a legal process controlled by the Crown that would have allowed the latter to legally gag and control him on the eve of his important tour of Europe in September.

www.salem-news.com...




edit on ApruTue, 15 Apr 2014 20:24:18 -05008pm30Tue, 15 Apr 2014 20:24:18 -050020142415 by Murgatroid because: I felt like it..



posted on Apr, 15 2014 @ 08:22 PM
link   
reply to post by adjensen
 





He wasn't "fired without cause", he quit. The "firing" was the UCC declaration that he was unfit to be a minister, which he clearly was.


Yeah sure...I've heard that line before.........

Who ya gonna believe? The Church? Ha Ha! I don't think so. I don't see how anyone could trust the Catholic Church / United Church to tell the truth.

Tell me Adjenson, when did the Vatican have their "come to Jesus moment" and realized that genocide was NOT a Christian right?



posted on Apr, 15 2014 @ 08:25 PM
link   
reply to post by windword
 


Where is your evidence that the Canadian government killed 50,000 children in the Indian Residential Schools?



posted on Apr, 15 2014 @ 08:26 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Apr, 15 2014 @ 08:27 PM
link   
reply to post by Murgatroid
 


Did you see my post earlier about where Annett gets his 50,000 children murdered number from? Do you have a lucid response to that? Take off your tinfoil hat, Murgatroid, and tell me what your evidence is that 50,000 First Nations children were murdered by the Canadian government.



posted on Apr, 15 2014 @ 08:33 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Apr, 15 2014 @ 10:41 PM
link   

windword
reply to post by adjensen
 





It has been proven that Annett dug up animal bones at the direction of a psychic, and then lied about it, saying that the bones were "from a mass grave" that Ground Penetrating Radar had discovered.

You asked what was false in his documentary, and I said his claim that 50,000 children were killed was, and provided evidence for that, and yet I'm the one who's wrong, because I won't take the word, with no evidence, of a lunatic. He's actually gone so far as to say that 50,000 to 100,000 were killed -- 2/3 of the children in those schools were killed, and yet there are no mass graves, no testimony that "66% of my classmates were murdered", nothing whatsoever.



Obviously you haven't watched the documentary. Annett makes no claim of 50,000 children killed, the Indians do. There is no digging up bones or claims of mass graves.


www.salem-news.com...

And yet here he stands....

Forget the documentary....made from the stolen testimonies of victims who testified at the only real tribunal into these abuses... IHRAAM

Kevin is an infiltrator and disruptor of Native causes...and now of Catholic Abuse Survivor's causes... He's a psy-ops keeping you bedazzled so that NO REAL JUSTICE WILL EVER BE HAD AGAINST THE EVIL OLIGARCHY...he's like a shiny object...telling you that YOU have no power...put your faith in the White Reverend and his Holy Tribunal...











posted on Apr, 15 2014 @ 11:01 PM
link   

adjensen
reply to post by windword
 



There's clearly a smear campaign making outrageous claims against Annett.

It's funny that those behind your imagined "smear campaign" are people who Annett still claims to represent, and, while they have proof of his lying and fabrication of evidence, the response in support of him is blind devotion, such as you display, or moronic claims of Freemason and Illuminati conspiracy that a third grader would laugh at.

I believe that Lydia White Calf is featured in your precious documentary.


Lydia White Calf is the wife of a residential school survivor who put a lot of her time and energy into supporting Kevin Annett. She has given him 10′s of thousands of dollars to fund his personal expenses, travel expenses and the printing of his self-published books. Over time, Lydia realized that Kevin was not behaving in a way she would expect of a ‘reverend’ who said he was working on the survivor’s behalf. When she spoke out, he labelled her as a ‘black ops’ operative- does that sound familiar? (Source)

There ya go. "Smear campaign" by one of the people in your video, and as I understand it, she's not the only one.


Again, if you can't discuss the content of the documentary, you and I have nothing more to discuss.

The subject of this thread is not Kevin Annett's documentary.

It is the supposed trial of the Canadian government and the credibility of the source of that "Historic Breaking News", Kevin Annett. Unless you have evidence that a legitimate court held a legitimate trial, and an impartial judge or jury found Stephen Harper, Queen Elizabeth and Pope Francis guilty of crimes against humanity, you're as baseless as Annett and his foolish show trials.


Few people know what really happened during that Tribunal in 1998...the Circle of Justice fell apart because of Annett. These were real activists doing the work themselves, using their own scholars and researchers to make real headway. Then Kevin stole their testimony...tried to submit a PhD thesis using it...and write his books and make Unrepentant from it... Few Native people who have come in contact with Annett have come out unscathed.

His 'evidence' that brought down Ratzinger included a video taped interview with Dr. Jennifer Wade of Amnesty International lauding the angelic Rev. Annett. The tribunal happened in 2012. The interview happened in 2008. Yet in a letter to his radio producer he called her a liar.... Now how do you use a liar's testimony to convict a criminal??

From: hiddenfromhistory@yahoo.ca
To: RedTownRadio@aol.com
Sent: 3/13/2010 9:29:13 P.M. Central Standard Time
Subj: Re: Fwd: rescheduling show

Thanks Nell. Jennifer is lying again. I knew Lori when I was still with Pam, but Pam was leaving me for the Maritimes anyway, after family pressure made her want to go home, and she actually thanked me for giving her the excuse to leave me.

But there's more to it. Pam's dad is a United Church minister who was always wary about me, and he exploded after Pam asked him about the sterilization doctor, George Darby, whom her dad knew. Then he started urging Pam to leave me because frankly he was scared of what might come out about his links to Darby. Pam admitted al this to me and I told Jennifer.

Jennifer knows all this so for her to make it look like I;m just an adulterer shows how once again she's just trying to malign me, and is misleading you (and others) about me and my situation.

Thanks for cancelling the interview with her. More soon!
Kev



Read and Hear the truth of Genocide in Canada, past and present, at this website: www.hiddenfromhistory.org , and watch Kevin's award-winning documentary film UNREPENTANT on the same website.

UNREPENTANT: Kevin Annett and Canada's Genocide
- Winner, Best Foreign Documentary Film, Los Angeles Independent Film Festival, March 2007, Best Director of a Foreign Documentary, New York Independent Film Festival, October 2006
- Winner, Best Canadian Film, Creation Aboriginal Film Festival, Edmonton, 2009


“Kevin is more deserving of the Nobel Peace Prize than many who have received it in the past.”
- Dr. Noam Chomsky
Institute Professor Emeritus
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

"As a long time front line worker with the Elders' Council at the Downtown Eastside Women's Centre, I stand behind what Kevin Annett is trying to do for our people. The genocide that continues today and which stemmed from the residential schools needs to be exposed. Kevin Annett helps break the silence, and brings the voice of our people all over the world."
Carol Muree Martin - Spirit Tree Woman
Nisgaa Nation

"I gave Kevin Annett his Indian name, Eagle Strong Voice, in 2004 when I adopted him into our Anishinabe Nation. He carries that name proudly because he is doing the job he was sent to do, to tell his people of their wrongs. He speaks strongly and with truth. He speaks for our stolen and murdered children. I ask everyone to listen to him and welcome him."
Chief Louis Daniels - Whispers Wind
Elder, Turtle Clan, Anishinabe Nation
Winnipeg, Manitoba


And this from Chomsky....

From: chomsky@MIT.EDU
To: kbearchief@msn.com
Subject: RE: Kevin Annett, Canada
Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2012 21:07:38 -0400

Sorry to hear about all of this.

I actually know next to nothing about Annett. As for the quote you cite, which I’ve seen a number of times, it could be real, though I don’t remember it. It would have almost certainly been an ironic comment about the Nobel Prize. Virtually anyone you pick at random is more deserving than Henry Kissinger and other first class war criminals. Reminds me of when Obama won the prize. Before I’d heard about it, I was called by a Norwegian newspaper for a statement. The only thing I could think of was something similar: by the standards of the prize, not too bad I suppose.

Noam Chomsky


Just sayin....



posted on Apr, 15 2014 @ 11:08 PM
link   
reply to post by Murgatroid
 


Jason Bowman was not some unconfirmed identity... I spoke with Bill Squires of Brantford (Mohawk Workers) who has had Bowman hanging around there for many years... Bowman and Annett worked together and Annett spoke of Bowmans de jure submission at QCB...It was mentioned by Annett on Kevin's own radio shows several times...

www.google.ca... .69i57.12667j0j4&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8

The same Occupy socialists that Kevin was hanging around with in Toronto when he was waiving around dead childrens bones are the same people smearing Greg Renouf on that 'Dangerous' blog... the same people who were arrested at G20 for smashing cop cars and store windows... (yeah, real credible sources...)



posted on Apr, 16 2014 @ 08:28 AM
link   
reply to post by mysaskcan
 





Kevin is an infiltrator and disruptor of Native causes...and now of Catholic Abuse Survivor's causes... He's a psy-ops keeping you bedazzled so that NO REAL JUSTICE WILL EVER BE HAD AGAINST THE EVIL OLIGARCHY...he's like a shiny object...telling you that YOU have no power...put your faith in the White Reverend and his Holy Tribunal...


I find it suspicious how much power Kevin Annett's detractors give him.

The Crown and the Canadians government, in collusion with the United Church and the Catholic Church violently kidnapped hundreds of thousands of children, threw them in unsanitary and inhuman environments where they were beaten, tortured and exposed to deadly disease, drugged, sterilized and murdered by nuns and priests. Now I ask you, "Can there be too many voices denouncing this injustice?"

Who wields the most influence, The Crown, the Vatican and the Canadian government or some loud mouth activist? Who's the easier target and who has the greater motivation and resources to destroy a person's life and reputation?

It seems to me that worst criticism of Kevin Annett is that he refused to keep what he learned quite and that he was too enthusiastic and too naive. In the meantime, those that stand accused are more than happy to add to the distraction and dismissal of the actual crimes against humanity that they committed, by assassinating a loud mouth's character.






edit on 16-4-2014 by windword because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 16 2014 @ 01:36 PM
link   
reply to post by mysaskcan
 



(yeah, real credible sources...)

Speaking of real credible sources...

How about the two below?
Seems legit to me...


STILL waiting for someone to explain WHY so many here are so naive to actually believe what the government and religion have been saying all along...

I WON'T hold my breath BTW.




posted on Apr, 16 2014 @ 01:42 PM
link   
reply to post by windword
 



The Crown and the Canadians government, in collusion with the United Church and the Catholic Church violently kidnapped hundreds of thousands of children

"Violently kidnapped hundreds of thousands"? Where is your evidence of that? Do you know anything about the Canadian Residential Schools?



posted on Apr, 16 2014 @ 01:49 PM
link   
reply to post by Murgatroid
 



STILL waiting for someone to explain WHY so many here are so naive to actually believe what the government and religion have been saying all along…

What is your evidence that the Canadian government is lying and that they murdered 50,000 children?

I've asked you directly twice, and all you respond with is your conspiratorial nonsense, so I take it that you have no answer to that question?

So one answer for why people might believe what the government says is because the alternative appears to be crackpots who just make things up and live in a world of delusion.



posted on Apr, 16 2014 @ 02:57 PM
link   

adjensen
What is your evidence that the Canadian government is lying and that they murdered 50,000 children? I've asked you directly twice, and all you respond with is your conspiratorial nonsense...

Your question has already been answered MANY times in the thread:

UNREPENTANT - CANADA'S GENOCIDE
WINNER: BEST INTERNATIONAL DOCUMENTARY - 2006 LOS ANGELES INDEPENDENT FILM FESTIVAL. **WINNER: BEST DIRECTOR for an INTERNATIONAL DOCUMENTARY - 2006 NEW YORK INTERNATIONAL FILM FESTIVAL.


People choose ignorance on purpose in order to feel comfortable.

No one can convince you of something you are in denial about.

The bottom line is that there is no proof that will satisfy you so you will continue to believe whatever it is that you believe.

I believe this quote says it all:


Originally posted by MagicWand67
But, I feel it would be a complete waste of my time. You are far from a "normal guy". You are a member of the military. Your training and education has indoctrinated and brainwashed you. You've been taught to follow orders, trust your superiors and defend the Government no matter what. Even if it's wrong or evil you, as a member of the military, are expected to blindly do your duty and not ask question or refuse an order.

If you don't see it. It doesn't mean it isn't there. If you want the proof you will need to seek the truth and find it for yourself. No one can convince you of something you are in denial about. You must learn the truth on your own. It seems clear to me that your agenda is not to seek the truth. Instead you seek to support your existing belief system and to deny what you do not want to be real. You are still just following orders like a good soldier. Whether you realize it or not.



posted on Apr, 16 2014 @ 03:07 PM
link   
reply to post by Murgatroid
 



Your question has already been answered MANY times in the thread:

Posting a link to a video that does not include any evidence of 50,000 deaths is not evidence.

If that's your only response, then you have no evidence. Annett made up the number, as I showed earlier, then put it in the mouths of the people in your video. They are not experts testifying, they are regular people relating anecdotal evidence of what they saw, which was already known prior to the video being made, and which does not support claims of 50,000 deaths.

The only documented evidence, that provided by the Canadian Truth and Reconciliation Commission, is that between 3,000 and 4,000 children died in the Residential Schools, the vast majority due to disease in the early 1900s.

If you wish to set aside your silly theories, do some actual research and present salient facts that prove that 50,000 children were murdered by the Canadian government, I will be happy to listen to you. Barring that, you have nothing to add to the debate.



posted on Apr, 16 2014 @ 03:19 PM
link   
reply to post by adjensen
 





The only documented evidence, that provided by the Canadian Truth and Reconciliation Commission, is that between 3,000 and 4,000 children died in the Residential Schools, the vast majority due to disease in the early 1900s.


There you go again, denial and dismissal!

I don't believe this commission any more than I believe the Warren Report or the 911 Commission Report. Why would anyone trust the people responsible for these crimes to tell the truth? I especially don't trust you to post non biased information, as you have shown that protecting the reputation of the "Church" is more important to you than people lives.

The Catholic Church continues to hide behind denial culpability and still hasn't adequately apologized for their role in the purposeful genocide of Native Americans.



posted on Apr, 16 2014 @ 03:54 PM
link   
reply to post by windword
 


Why do you think I care whether you believe them or not? You've made it clear that you prefer wild claims with no evidence to contrary parties with documented evidence. That's called willful ignorance, but you're welcome to it.

As for the Catholic Church, you either didn't watch Annett's documentary or you didn't pay much attention to it -- his primary axe to grind in that film is the United Church of Canada, the church he was booted out of. The Catholic Church isn't ignored, of course, but it's not the focus. His more recent fixation on "Baby eating Popes" seems to be the result of his attempt to gain followers in Europe as his support in Canada has dwindled.

That said, while I defend the church against idiocy like the ITCCS, I have never said that there are no nuns and priests who are guilty of abuse, or bishops and church hierarchy guilty of covering it up. There is no doubt in my mind that there are Catholics who are guilty of abusing or even killing children in the Indian Residential Schools, but nowhere near the exaggerated frequency that Annett and you would have me believe.

That's the difference between myself and most of the other people in the thread -- I prefer the truth over fantasy, even when it's not something I'm proud to be a part of.



new topics

top topics



 
55
<< 16  17  18    20  21  22 >>

log in

join