It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
amazing
Well this gets to, in my opinion, the whole point of the thread. Skeptics, come up with a plausible or possible solution and then stick to that as a hard truth instead of saying they don't know. Again, I'm not saying that we shouldn't be skeptical of everything but skepticism takes a bad turn when it says...all abduction cases are sleep paralysis, all lights in the sky are planes and let's not forget swamp gas. That's taking the lazy way out and that is NOT denying ignorance but spreading it.
tsingtao
aliens but no God.
ok!
when u meet them, ask them about a creator?
draknoir2
Wrong forum, Elijah.
Quantum teleportation is already working on this
Whereas the result may sound like a way to send faster-than-light messages, it isn't, really, because you can't know the state of the entangled photon pair before it's measured; so there's no way to control it and make the photon at the other end take on certain states and use it like a Morse code telegraph.
Is that how you're going to brush this off, as all fantasy? Who said it was covered up for thousands of years? The Sumerians and Egyptians wrote and drew about the alien presence.
There is quite a deal of information about the shadowy secret gov. and it's affiliations with ET 's plus the secrecy behind it which has taken place since the 1940s.
You obviously want to remain oblivious to pertinent information that should be taken into consideration in favor of waiting on press conference level admission of the alien presence. Well keep on waiting.
Given all the scientific searches carried out thus far (SETI and its variants) along with the fermi paradox, I think it's realistically plausible that we are indeed alone in the galaxy as far as intelligent life is concerned even if intelligent life is prevalent throughout the observable universe.
"Very soon we will become undetectable," he said. In short, in space no one will hear us at all.
What is true for humans would probably also be true for aliens, who may already have moved to much more efficient methods of TV and radio broadcasting. Trying to find ET from their favourite shows was going to be harder than we thought, Drake said.
www.theguardian.com...
You're putting your own spin and misinterpreting these ancient drawings to fit into what you want to believe. More than likely though, you're believing what you're being told by "experts" like with the TV show Ancient Aliens. Shows that rely on selling advertising and not one of searching for facts. If they search for real facts, there's nothing there. There's nothing there means the show loses viewers in turn losing money. Finding aliens in everything is much more exciting and sellable than having nothing. People like you get caught up in this excitement and fantasy lore and unfortunately keep these shows alive.
If the Sumerians and Egyptians worked with aliens one-on-one, where are the artifacts? Any artifact found, given, or taken from one of these interactions would be coveted and treated godlike. If these weren't included in a pharaohs tomb or given the same level of respect, it would have been passed down for generations. According to you, this isn't a one time occurrence within one culture, it happened multiple times with many different cultures. Yet, still no physical evidence? What you'll do here is again excuse the reason we have no alien artifacts by citing some other unproven fact. It's an endless circle of excuses. It's only way to keep this phenomenon alive. If this was happening for a fact, there would be no need for excuses.
Yes, even more secrets and more conspiracies of something. Aliens have only dealt with the governments of the world, or if they deal with the common citizen, the governments/military will sweep in and remove any and all traces of evidence. This has happened every time all over the world in the 65+ year popularity boom of this phenomenon, correct? That sounds completely logical to you?
No, I just have a clear understanding of the meaning and impact a race of alien beings visiting Earth would have. I refuse to accept less than and anecdotal evidence and make it into a commonplace, trivial event. That's exactly what you do by buying into this sensationalized garbage online and on TV. It becomes tabloid-like and should be treated that way. I demand physical evidence for a claimed physical event that has been going many times and for thousands (according to you) of years
amazing
game over man
reply to post by conundrummer
Well not to go case by case account of the AA theory, but I have gone to Peru and visited many ancient sites. I flew over the Nasca lines and every local called him the astronaut man. It is also the most difficult drawing because it is the only one nor on a flat surface but on a mountain side.
Now my problem with science is someone coming up with a logical explanation, confirming that to be the truth, when the answer is truly unknown. Nasca is an example.
Well this gets to, in my opinion, the whole point of the thread. Skeptics, come up with a plausible or possible solution and then stick to that as a hard truth instead of saying they don't know. Again, I'm not saying that we shouldn't be skeptical of everything but skepticism takes a bad turn when it says...all abduction cases are sleep paralysis, all lights in the sky are planes and let's not forget swamp gas. That's taking the lazy way out and that is NOT denying ignorance but spreading it.
uncommitted
When you say "taking the lazy way out" - you are right - for both parties.
uncommitted
amazing
game over man
reply to post by conundrummer
Well not to go case by case account of the AA theory, but I have gone to Peru and visited many ancient sites. I flew over the Nasca lines and every local called him the astronaut man. It is also the most difficult drawing because it is the only one nor on a flat surface but on a mountain side.
Now my problem with science is someone coming up with a logical explanation, confirming that to be the truth, when the answer is truly unknown. Nasca is an example.
Well this gets to, in my opinion, the whole point of the thread. Skeptics, come up with a plausible or possible solution and then stick to that as a hard truth instead of saying they don't know. Again, I'm not saying that we shouldn't be skeptical of everything but skepticism takes a bad turn when it says...all abduction cases are sleep paralysis, all lights in the sky are planes and let's not forget swamp gas. That's taking the lazy way out and that is NOT denying ignorance but spreading it.
You do know the term swamp gas has in reality only ever been used, by an official for a supposed sighting that happened near a swamp and even then the person didn't say anything other than it was a possible cause? If you want to stick to a cliche that's fine, it's actually a little tired though and really shows up people who think they are being clever without actually having any real knowledge of the subject...
en.wikipedia.org...
When you say "taking the lazy way out" - you are right - for both parties. It's as lazy to say that twinkling light in the sky on a youtube video is an ET craft when some very quick analysis shows it's Venus.
Please describe my logical fallacy. My point is that Skeptics can be as arrogant, and almost religiously fervent in 'their' beliefs as the True Believer. Skeptics want to believe something so badly that they will deny evidence and data if it is opposed to their stance. That sentence could easily be applied to any True Believer as well and NOT all Skeptics are like that. Many are not. Many on these forums in particular are though.
draknoir2
amazing
draknoir2
amazing
Well this gets to, in my opinion, the whole point of the thread. Skeptics, come up with a plausible or possible solution and then stick to that as a hard truth instead of saying they don't know. Again, I'm not saying that we shouldn't be skeptical of everything but skepticism takes a bad turn when it says...all abduction cases are sleep paralysis, all lights in the sky are planes and let's not forget swamp gas. That's taking the lazy way out and that is NOT denying ignorance but spreading it.
Unless you are directly responding to someone actually making those statements these are nothing but straw man arguments.
And what is wrong with a skeptic saying they do not know?
There is no straw man argument here. I'm not making stuff up and you know as well as I do that skeptics stick to dogma as much as believers and that both deny the facts and don't look at the data. There is nothing wrong with a skeptic saying they don't know. The problem is when skeptics or believers say that they do know....when both should be saying they don't know. Not railing against skeptics but railing against the brand of skeptics that assume they know the truth and act as if their opinions are anything more than opinions. You see what I'm saying and I'm not making stuff up so ...then the question is why would you bring up a derogatory term like "straw man" to invalidate my points? Questions or statements?
"Straw man" is not a derogatory term. It's describes a logical fallacy whereby an argument is made against a fabricated or hypothetical position [the straw man or effigy] rather than an actual argument made by someone involved in the debate.
amazing
The Universe is what...13.8 billion years old....
They've discovered a galaxy that they think formed only 500 million years after the big bang...The oldest known star in our galaxy is 13.6 billion years old. There are billions of galaxies in the known universe all of differing ages.
That means that there are very likely ..millions if not billions of solar systems that formed billions of years earlier than our own solar system, meaning that there is a very good high probability that there are life forms in the universe that are billions of years more evolved than we are. That is a possibility that you need to consider based on statistics, probabilities, math and science.
amazing
uncommitted
amazing
game over man
reply to post by conundrummer
Well not to go case by case account of the AA theory, but I have gone to Peru and visited many ancient sites. I flew over the Nasca lines and every local called him the astronaut man. It is also the most difficult drawing because it is the only one nor on a flat surface but on a mountain side.
Now my problem with science is someone coming up with a logical explanation, confirming that to be the truth, when the answer is truly unknown. Nasca is an example.
Well this gets to, in my opinion, the whole point of the thread. Skeptics, come up with a plausible or possible solution and then stick to that as a hard truth instead of saying they don't know. Again, I'm not saying that we shouldn't be skeptical of everything but skepticism takes a bad turn when it says...all abduction cases are sleep paralysis, all lights in the sky are planes and let's not forget swamp gas. That's taking the lazy way out and that is NOT denying ignorance but spreading it.
You do know the term swamp gas has in reality only ever been used, by an official for a supposed sighting that happened near a swamp and even then the person didn't say anything other than it was a possible cause? If you want to stick to a cliche that's fine, it's actually a little tired though and really shows up people who think they are being clever without actually having any real knowledge of the subject...
en.wikipedia.org...
When you say "taking the lazy way out" - you are right - for both parties. It's as lazy to say that twinkling light in the sky on a youtube video is an ET craft when some very quick analysis shows it's Venus.
Agreed, but you keep missing my point. The point is, that Self-proclaimed skeptics, not all, but most on these forums, take the lazy way out as often as the true believers. they'll find one plausible solution and stick to that as hard truth, saying things like. "It was most likely" when the true statement would be. "One likely reason for this was.." Skeptics don't get a free pass here, when they pretend they know all the answers.