It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
“They hate us for our freedoms!”
Originally posted by butcherguy
reply to post by Covertblack
Logos are important.
That is how we identify things. The term 'military police' actually means something. It refers to departments in the branches of the military when we are speaking of the US. That vehicle was labeled military police. It may have been a National Guard vehicle, which would not be surprising, as it is said that they were activated. I just am not convinced that this vehicle is DHS.
So they did it anyway? What sense does that make?
Originally posted by captaintyinknots
Perhaps because they knew it was an extreme measure, was a lot to ask of the people, and that there would be people out there itching to act in a foolish manner just to prove they dont have to listen?
Originally posted by butcherguy
The lockdown actually began an hour after police came out with Dzohkar's name. Why did they wait an hour if this lockdown was so effing necessary and important?
Just postulating...
Originally posted by butcherguy
So they did it anyway? What sense does that make?
Originally posted by captaintyinknots
Perhaps because they knew it was an extreme measure, was a lot to ask of the people, and that there would be people out there itching to act in a foolish manner just to prove they dont have to listen?
Originally posted by butcherguy
The lockdown actually began an hour after police came out with Dzohkar's name. Why did they wait an hour if this lockdown was so effing necessary and important?
Just postulating...
Aren't you the guy that doesn't want to hear 'what ifs'?
I read you first post in this thread. The first sentence of that post is a 'what if'.
No doubt about that. I read that they have the turret gun mounts removed and not a lot else done to them.
Originally posted by Covertblack
Originally posted by butcherguy
reply to post by Covertblack
Logos are important.
That is how we identify things. The term 'military police' actually means something. It refers to departments in the branches of the military when we are speaking of the US. That vehicle was labeled military police. It may have been a National Guard vehicle, which would not be surprising, as it is said that they were activated. I just am not convinced that this vehicle is DHS.
Honestly, some of the equipment DHS has is not far from what the military carries.
Friday's large and militarized manhunt in Boston and environs was without precedent in American history. -- Armored tanks and vehicles, automatic weapons, SWAT teams, attack helicopters, thermal-imaging cameras, sharpshooters, police and FBI agents shut down an entire urban area, the Boston Herald said.[1] -- The Secret Service and a Navy bomb squad stationed in Newport, Rhode Island, were also involved, NPR said.[2] -- In addition to the cost of the vast deployment of forces, an economist estimated that the economic cost of shutting down Boston for a day was about $333 million, according to Bloomberg Businessweek.[3] -- The Boston metropolitan area provides "2 percent of the $45 billion in overall U.S. daily economic activity," the New York Daily News reported.[4] -- The London Daily Mail posted a collection of dramatic photographs of the event.[5]....
1. 'UNPRECEDENTED' SHOW OF FORCE
By Gary J. Remal
Boston Herald
April 20, 2013
bostonherald.com...
BOSTON -- Armored tanks, automatic weapons, SWAT teams, and a thermal-imaging camera on a helicopter were part of the massive arsenal that helped hunt down a 19-year-old college student wanted for bombing the Boston Marathon and killing a Massachusetts Institute of Technology policeman.
If it was a last resort tactic, it makes perfect sense.
Originally posted by butcherguy
So they did it anyway? What sense does that make?
Aren't you the guy that doesn't want to hear 'what ifs'?
I read you first post in this thread. The first sentence of that post is a 'what if'.
Nope, no what if there. Let's go further:
Here's a question for those that have a huge issue with this pic:
Nope, still no what if....
What would you do if the shoe was on the other foot?
Still looking for it....
You are part of a tactical team tasked with catching someone who is willing to kill a lot of people. You are clearing a street. Suddenly, you see the curtain on a window pull back. You see a shadow of a figure through it. That figure raises something to eye level, pointed right at you.
Would you assume "oh, its just some guy taking a picture", or would you think "it is possible this is the suspect. I need to have him in my sights until I know it is safe". I mean really. Lets think for a second people.
Originally posted by butcherguy
reply to post by Covertblack
I would have put out APB and BOL for the seriously wounded brother. I would not have told the police to drive down residential streets pointing guns at innocent families. I would have cordoned the area off, meaning the use of roadblocks and checkpoints.
Originally posted by ivbnu
reply to post by captaintyinknots
I'm glad your not a fan. The problem is though this will promote MORE terrorism. The "terrorist" have won cause everyone jumps every time someone farts. Freaking out and over reacting makes us look like FOOLS not heros.
Reports have come out recently stating there is NO credible terrist threat against the us some calm down.
There are not terrorist everywhere waiting to get us. If there were what are they waiting for?
Originally posted by gladtobehere
Its too dangerous...
I apologize if this image has already been posted though even if it has, its probably worth a second look.
When I first saw it, I was at a loss for words.
Clearly, the photographer was using his camera, was that his crime, taking a pic?
Is the threat of lethal force appropriate for taking a picture?
There are a variety of suppositions and hypotheticals that we can discuss here but irregardless, IMHO "America" is heading down a very disturbing path...
edit on 27-4-2013 by gladtobehere because: (no reason given)
Are you deliberately distorting the sequence of events, or are you really that confused about what happened? They asked for help in identifying the suspects. Meaning they did not know who they were are where they were. The next contact they had was 7/11 cam photos and then the murder at MIT.
Originally posted by ivbnu
reply to post by captaintyinknots
I don't have a problem with helping police but this situation imo did not warret 9k men by any strech of the imagination.
The fbi should have shut thier mouth and gone to thier homes and picked them up BEFORE they released the photos. There is just NO excuse. They allowed this to happen they were in charge of the scene
National Guard is absolutely allowed on US streets.
Originally posted by butcherguy
reply to post by captaintyinknots
Here, I will make it big for you, it was the portion of the first sentence after the colon.
WHAT would you do IF THE SHOE WAS ON THE OTHER FOOT?
It IS a 'WHAT IF'!
Yeah, they are. That doesnt mean its illegal
Originally posted by Kram09
reply to post by captaintyinknots
National Guard is absolutely allowed on US streets.
And they're the military in all but name.